Re: Experimental Integration into Mahout

2013-03-12 Thread Gustavo Enrique Salazar Torres
+1 (examples could be used for tutorial purposes). On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Mirko Kämpf wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Sebastian Schelter > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 12.03.2013 20:33, Jake Mannix wrote: > > > +1 to this distinction > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 12,

Re: Experimental Integration into Mahout

2013-03-12 Thread Mirko Kämpf
+1 On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: > +1 > > On 12.03.2013 20:33, Jake Mannix wrote: > > +1 to this distinction > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Avery Ching wrote: > > > >> My thoughts were that examples would be like toy examples (not suitable > >> for p

Re: Experimental Integration into Mahout

2013-03-12 Thread Sebastian Schelter
+1 On 12.03.2013 20:33, Jake Mannix wrote: > +1 to this distinction > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Avery Ching wrote: > >> My thoughts were that examples would be like toy examples (not suitable >> for production) that might be used, say, for unittesting. Applications >> would be ful

Re: Experimental Integration into Mahout

2013-03-12 Thread Jake Mannix
+1 to this distinction On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Avery Ching wrote: > My thoughts were that examples would be like toy examples (not suitable > for production) that might be used, say, for unittesting. Applications > would be full-fledged ready to run applications that should have perh

Re: Experimental Integration into Mahout

2013-03-12 Thread Avery Ching
My thoughts were that examples would be like toy examples (not suitable for production) that might be used, say, for unittesting. Applications would be full-fledged ready to run applications that should have perhaps a supporting input format for actual data. On 3/12/13 12:19 PM, Claudio Marte

Re: Experimental Integration into Mahout

2013-03-12 Thread Claudio Martella
My thoughts are: what is the difference then between the applications and the examples package? On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Avery Ching wrote: > HI Nicolas, > > I'd be interested in seeing this algorithm implemented in Giraph. My > suggestion would be to put it directly in Giraph. We shou

Re: Experimental Integration into Mahout

2013-03-12 Thread Sebastian Schelter
The discussion is centered around potentially using Giraph as a BSP framework for implementing machine learning algorithms. But it's really only about the future (in terms of the next months/years). And it's totally open what the result will be. You already said that Giraph is a perfect fit, so I'

Re: Experimental Integration into Mahout

2013-03-12 Thread Avery Ching
HI Nicolas, I'd be interested in seeing this algorithm implemented in Giraph. My suggestion would be to put it directly in Giraph. We should create a new maven module called giraph-applications and then maybe something like org.apache.giraph.application.affinity package. You can see org.apa

Re: Experimental Integration into Mahout

2013-03-12 Thread Nicolas Lalevée
I am not sure what you think by integration, but I am implementing the affinity propagation algorithm proposed by Frey and Dueck [1]. And Giraph is a perfect fit for the implementation. And I was wondering, if I have the opportunity to contribute that implementation, where should I post it ? Gir

Experimental Integration into Mahout

2013-03-12 Thread Sebastian Schelter
Hi fellow Giraphers, on Mahout's dev@ mailinglist, there is a discussion about a potential (experimental) future integration of Giraph. Might be good to hear your opinion about that. Best, Sebastian