[jira] [Updated] (GORA-414) Upgrade to Accumulo 1.6.4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Turner updated GORA-414: -- Summary: Upgrade to Accumulo 1.6.4 (was: Upgrade to Accumulo 1.7.X) > Upgrade to Accumulo 1.6.4 >

[jira] [Resolved] (GORA-414) Upgrade to Accumulo 1.6.4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Turner resolved GORA-414. --- Resolution: Fixed > Upgrade to Accumulo 1.6.4 > - > > Key:

[jira] [Created] (GORA-451) Upgrade to Accumulo 1.8.0

Keith Turner created GORA-451: - Summary: Upgrade to Accumulo 1.8.0 Key: GORA-451 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-451 Project: Apache Gora Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Commented] (GORA-414) Upgrade to Accumulo 1.7.X

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15007906#comment-15007906 ] Keith Turner commented on GORA-414: --- I have created two branches on GH. * [GORA-414 |

[jira] [Commented] (GORA-414) Upgrade to Accumulo 1.7.X

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15007918#comment-15007918 ] Keith Turner commented on GORA-414: --- Ok. Is there any interest in reviewing the change? If so I can do a

[jira] [Assigned] (GORA-414) Upgrade to Accumulo 1.7.X

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Turner reassigned GORA-414: - Assignee: Keith Turner > Upgrade to Accumulo 1.7.X > - > >

[jira] [Commented] (GORA-414) Upgrade to Accumulo 1.7.X

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14993949#comment-14993949 ] Keith Turner commented on GORA-414: --- The problem is that this Gora code is using some non public API

[jira] [Commented] (GORA-66) testDeleteByQueryFields seems incorrect

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13751527#comment-13751527 ] Keith Turner commented on GORA-66: -- Its not that Accumulo can not handle exclusive end keys.

[jira] [Commented] (GORA-66) testDeleteByQueryFields seems incorrect

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13751550#comment-13751550 ] Keith Turner commented on GORA-66: -- To expand on my previous comment about adding complexity

[jira] [Commented] (GORA-216) Verify storage and retrieval of Avro null-single- type Union data within Gora-Accumulo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13621590#comment-13621590 ] Keith Turner commented on GORA-216: --- As for sparse my understanding is that if a field is

[jira] [Commented] (GORA-216) Verify storage and retrieval of Avro null-single- type Union data within Gora-Accumulo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13616332#comment-13616332 ] Keith Turner commented on GORA-216: --- bq. You are right, the behavior changes. I will undo

[jira] [Commented] (GORA-216) Verify storage and retrieval of Avro null-single- type Union data within Gora-Accumulo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13613745#comment-13613745 ] Keith Turner commented on GORA-216: --- bq. return a Persistent instance whenever the row

[jira] [Commented] (GORA-216) Verify storage and retrieval of Avro null-single- type Union data within Gora-Accumulo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13612857#comment-13612857 ] Keith Turner commented on GORA-216: --- I created this patch against the gora-174 branch.