Yeah, true.
I guess we can change the link / name of the page.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Pascal Schumacher
wrote:
> Thanks. :)
>
> Google is usually pretty fast, if the website is popular enough (which I
> guess we are).
>
>
> Am 20.01.2016 um 09:54 schrieb Guillaume Laforge:
>>
>> I've ma
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Paul King wrote:
> I think it would be good to have some kind of minimal roadmap in the
> new documentation to replace the old page but I agree as others have
> said that there is no point in having unrealistic goals - so something
> quite small is what I think we
Okie dokie, thanks Pascal.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Pascal Schumacher
wrote:
> I went ahead and removed the assignee of all issue which didn't look like
> they were currently worked on.
>
>
> Am 16.01.2016 um 13:11 schrieb Pascal Schumacher:
>>
>> Am 16.01.2016 um 06:06 schrieb Guillaume
I went ahead and removed the assignee of all issue which didn't look
like they were currently worked on.
Am 16.01.2016 um 13:11 schrieb Pascal Schumacher:
Am 16.01.2016 um 06:06 schrieb Guillaume Laforge:
I've moved forward and removed all component leads, and set back the
default assignment t
Hi Paul,
not sure but I think the website could be a better place for the roadmap
than the documentation. What do you think?
Cheers,
Pascal
Am 20.01.2016 um 13:49 schrieb Paul King:
I think it would be good to have some kind of minimal roadmap in the
new documentation to replace the old page
Thanks. :)
Google is usually pretty fast, if the website is popular enough (which I
guess we are).
Am 20.01.2016 um 09:54 schrieb Guillaume Laforge:
I've made a few updates to the site, to remove the "weekly" part of the story.
The sole thing I've not changed is the URL of the page, I'm wond
GR8 idea Paul. Would you have any thoughts for the GPars roadmap, pls.? See
this: http://gparsdocs.de.a9sapp.eu/Roadmap.html - ideas welcome 😊
Sent from my iPad
> On 20 Jan 2016, at 13:49, Paul King wrote:
>
> I think it would be good to have some kind of minimal roadmap in the
> new document
I think it would be good to have some kind of minimal roadmap in the
new documentation to replace the old page but I agree as others have
said that there is no point in having unrealistic goals - so something
quite small is what I think we need. I'll try to come up with
something hopefully next wee
I've made a few updates to the site, to remove the "weekly" part of the story.
The sole thing I've not changed is the URL of the page, I'm wondering
about the Google Search indexing...
OTOH, Google Search will update the link at some point. What do you think?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Pasc
