Re: [drlvm] things feel slow...

On Saturday 23 December 2006 04:09 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Gregory Shimansky wrote: > > I was not aware that drlvm didn't generate MethodEnter/Exit events for > > native methods when I wrote this email. Now after applying HARMONY-2828 > > which fills this gap I've rerun my test agent and the top

Re: [general]what do you think about this kind of exception order?

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your advice: ) Yes, it is impl detail, but this is one kind of problem. Thus I yelled here for getting an agreement to deal with similar problems. I do incline to follow RI in normal case if possible, but harmony's impl is better here. I wonder is it worth doing this trade-

Re: [general]what do you think about this kind of exception order?

The method name causes misunderstanding maybe. I'm talking about API behavior. Since may methods in harmony check the parameters then throw IllegalArgumentException before entering the critical block. But according testing for RI, I found it may throw another Exception before examing the arguments

Re: [general]what do you think about this kind of exception order?

On 12/23/06, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There are two methods, which throw exceptions in different order. public test1(int a, int b){ if(a>b){ throw AException(); } synchronized(obj){ if(blabla){ throw BException(); } } } public test2(int a, int

[general] airbag for harmony?

http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2006-09-12/deploying-the-airbag/ Wouldn't it be nice if we had the same system for harmony? -- Stefano.

Re: [drlvm] things feel slow...

Gregory Shimansky wrote: > I was not aware that drlvm didn't generate MethodEnter/Exit events for native > methods when I wrote this email. Now after applying HARMONY-2828 which fills > this gap I've rerun my test agent and the top10 for most called methods to > run hello world application has c

[classlib][logging] format of log messages

Hi, IMHO it is ok to use our own format for log messages produced by Logger.log() if the content is the same. BTW I like single-line style (currently used in Harmony) even more. So I think we can move this JIRA to non-bug-diff. What do others think? BTW I don't know any serious applications that

Re: [drlvm] things feel slow...

I was not aware that drlvm didn't generate MethodEnter/Exit events for native methods when I wrote this email. Now after applying HARMONY-2828 which fills this gap I've rerun my test agent and the top10 for most called methods to run hello world application has changed. The new top10 list looks

Re: svn commit: r487483 [1/4] - in /harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk: build/make/targets/ vm/interpreter/src/ vm/jitrino/src/jet/ vm/port/src/lil/em64t/pim/ vm/port/src/lil/ia32/pim/ vm/port/src/lil/ipf/p

On Monday 18 December 2006 18:37 Gregory Shimansky wrote: > Alexey Varlamov wrote: > > 2006/12/15, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Alexey, the newly added test shutdown.ThreadInterrupt stably hangs for > >> me on > >> windows 2003 server SP1 on P4 with HT. Can you verify this? The dead

Re: Issue with Yoko: org.omg.CORBA.INITIALIZE

Vasily, I've investigated the problem a bit and found that org.omg.CORBA.ORB.init(); call fails because there are no org.apache.yoko.orb.* classes at all in yoko.jar file. In Yoko they are located in core directory and compiled into a separated jar file (you may download it from http://people.apa

Re: Issue with Yoko: ClassLoader.classes

Absolutely, especially when Yoko is going to be used by Geronimo to remove it's dependency on the RI :) geir On Dec 22, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Mikhail Markov wrote: I think we should file it as JIRA in Yoko. Relying on private(!) field (even if this field exist only in Harmony :-)) looks inapp

Re: [general]what do you think about this kind of exception order?

I don't grok. You are talking about test behavior? or some API behavior? I'm guessing the latter. geir On Dec 22, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Tony Wu wrote: There are two methods, which throw exceptions in different order. public test1(int a, int b){ if(a>b){ throw AException(); }

Re: Issue with Yoko: ClassLoader.classes

I think we should file it as JIRA in Yoko. Relying on private(!) field (even if this field exist only in Harmony :-)) looks inapproprite to me. Regards, Mikhail On 12/22/06, Zakharov, Vasily M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, all, I was checking the output from HARMONY-2615

Issue with Yoko: org.omg.CORBA.INITIALIZE

Hi, all, Here's another Yoko issue I've found while checking the output from HARMONY-2615 stress test. The following three classes: org.omg.SendingContext.CodeBasePackage.URLHelper org.omg.SendingContext.CodeBasePackage.URLSeqHelper org.omg.Se

Issue with Yoko: ClassLoader.classes

Hi, all, I was checking the output from HARMONY-2615 stress test, and found a couple of issues with Yoko. org.apache.yoko.rmi.util.ClassLoaderLocal class contains the following line in its static initializer: classes_vector = ClassLoad

[general]what do you think about this kind of exception order?

There are two methods, which throw exceptions in different order. public test1(int a, int b){ if(a>b){ throw AException(); } synchronized(obj){ if(blabla){ throw BException(); } } } public test2(int a, int b){ synchronized(obj){ if(blabla){

RE: [drlvm][doc]Improve documentation autogenerated from DRLVM sources [was:RE: [drlvm][doc] doxygen documentation]

I've created one more patch to fix the rest bunch of headers with incorrect formatting. The patch includes the following files: - include/jit_import.h - vmcore/include/compile.h - vmcore/include/environment.h - vmcore/include/exceptions.h - vmcore/include/jit_runtime_support_common.h - vmcore

[Fwd: [announce-crypto] Bouncy Castle Crypto Provider Package version 1.35 now available]

FYI Original Message Subject: [announce-crypto] Bouncy Castle Crypto Provider Package version 1.35 now available Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:35:08 +1100 From: Jon Eaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: dev-crypto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], KVM Interest <[EM

Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-2803) stress.Mix hangs on RHEL4 update 4

On 12/22/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 21 December 2006 17:23 Elena Semukhina wrote: > On 12/21/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Evgueni Brevnov wrote: > > > On 12/21/06, Elena Semukhina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On 12/21/06, Evgueni Bre

Re: [drlvm] finalizer design questions

On 12/22/06, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Weldon, AFAIR without WBS it's an easy to write a test(we had such tests) that will work smoothly on SUN or BEA but fails on Harmony. Is "run any app RI is able to run" reason enough? Yes indeed this is reason enough for this stage of Har

Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-2803) stress.Mix hangs on RHEL4 update 4

On Thursday 21 December 2006 17:23 Elena Semukhina wrote: > On 12/21/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Evgueni Brevnov wrote: > > > On 12/21/06, Elena Semukhina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On 12/21/06, Evgueni Brevnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > Naveen, > > >> > > >

Re: [general] which version of gcc to use for distributables?

On Thursday 21 December 2006 14:17 Egor Pasko wrote: > On the 0x246 day of Apache Harmony Gregory Shimansky wrote: > > Egor Pasko wrote: > > > On the 0x245 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote: > > >> There's been some comment on the fact that I'm using GCC v4.x for the > > >> em64t buil

[testing] Eclipse Unit Tests run under Cruise Control

Hi all, That's just to let you know that I run Eclipse Unit Tests under Cruise Control on Linux (SLES 9)/ia32 and windows (xp)/ia32. During last 10 days Alexey Ignatenko and I worked on enabling EUT on Harmony and have increased EUT pass rate from ~60% up to 93-95% (not taking into account some i

Re: [general] JUnit consistency, practices

Agreed - they cause no harm and may also be useful for others. Regards, Oliver Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: My POV is that people don't have to create them, but if someone put one in because for whatever reason, they found it useful, leave it alone if it's not getting in the way geir Alexei Fe

Re: [general] aiming no regression

The issue 2845 was created to easily exclude tests by module base. Thanks, Vladimir On 12/22/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/21/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > 2006/12/20, Geir Magnusson Jr. < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > > >

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Classlib/linux.ia32 Build/Test

I've rolled back patches for HARMONY-1667, HARMONY-1799 and added to exclude list test org/apache/harmony/archive/tests/java/util/jar/JarExecTest.java Could you investigate? BTW, DRL VM halts silently - it only prints [junit] SIGSEGV in VM code. [junit] Stack trace: And overall test suite

Re: [drlvm] JNI problem?

Thanks, George! I've applied the patch Thanks, Mikhail 2006/12/21, George Timoshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: JIRA issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2834 Fix is provided. Great thanks to Alexander Astapchuk for his help during investigating. George.

Re: [drlvm] finalizer design questions

Weldon, AFAIR without WBS it's an easy to write a test(we had such tests) that will work smoothly on SUN or BEA but fails on Harmony. Is "run any app RI is able to run" reason enough? On 12/22/06, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The existing VM finalizer system has something called a

Re: Fwd: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Classlib/linux.ia32 Build/Test

Oliver Deakin wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> I think we should change the reply-to to the dev list... > > Agreed - it's easy to miss the reply messages in amongst all the build > fail/pass mails. Yep, sorry I just hit reply and expected the same behavior as the commit list. I had intended

Re: Fwd: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Classlib/linux.ia32 Build/Test

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I think we should change the reply-to to the dev list... Agreed - it's easy to miss the reply messages in amongst all the build fail/pass mails. Regards, Oliver Begin forwarded message: From: Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: December 21, 2006 4:41:05 PM

Re: [classlib] FindBugs results for luni (HARMONY-2811)

On 21/12/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2006/12/21, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > Ok, since nobody objects... > > Phew, you didn't give much time to look at it -- I got your 'please > look' and 'nobody objects' messages 18hrs apart. > > I'll look a