Nailed it -- thanks!
Nathan Beyer wrote:
One more try :)
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
I'm not able to recreate this on Win Vista. I'm going to tweak the
test anyway and commit the change. Let me know if you're still seeing
Thanks, Regis.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Regis xu.re...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin Zhou wrote:
Previously, it is proved by using benchmarks like Specjbb.
Since it's been a long time I don't really remember the accurate
statistics
of how much improvements it brings.
All right, I will
Kevin Zhou wrote:
Previously, it is proved by using benchmarks like Specjbb.
Since it's been a long time I don't really remember the accurate statistics
of how much improvements it brings.
All right, I will try to write some micro benchmarks :)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Regis Xu (JIRA)
Hi!
I'm a developer on the Android core libraries, many of which are derived
from Harmony. In October, Android Dan Bornstein
saidhttp://markmail.org/message/7o2w7asiftn7o3dl that
A Day Of Reckoning would someday come, where we reintegrate Android and
Harmony sources. I'm working on that effort.
Improved javadoc sounds good to me.
IANAL, but I believe that the javadoc follows the same contribution
rules as the source, so as long as the source changes can be
contributed, so can the javadoc changes.
-Nathan
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com wrote:
Hi!
Hello Jesse,
You brought brilliant news. I look forward for your contribution. The
official page on how to contribute is here [1]. Feel free to ask any
questions.
[1] http://harmony.apache.org/contribution_policy.html
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com
