Re: Harmony build - MSVS2008 - cl.exe failed

2009-04-23 Thread Deven You
Hi, I remember that VS 2008 can not work with harmony, back to VS 2003 will solve this. 2009/4/23 Manju Vijayakumar manju.b...@gmail.com Hi, Ok my build worked before with VS 2003 but for some reason I had to uninstall it and now I have VS 2008. I had particular issues and now I am down to

Re: [GSoC] About the community bonding period

2009-04-23 Thread Alexei Fedotov
Daniel, Just a hint (maybe too obvious for modern technologically advanced students :-). You can scan the signed document and e-mail a pdf. Thanks. 2009/4/23 Daniel Gong daniel.gong.fu...@gmail.com 2009/4/23 Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com Daniel Gong wrote: Hi, I have a question.

Re: Harmony build - MSVS2008 - cl.exe failed

2009-04-23 Thread Pavel Pervov
Well, yes, harmony cannot be built with VS9 OOB. But it may be the right time to enable it. I did it myself a while back but had no chance to commit changes. AFAIR you have to update APR, and minor changes in jit are required. You can open a jira and I'll attach what I have at hand there. WBR,

Re: Harmony build - MSVS2008 - cl.exe failed

2009-04-23 Thread Tim Ellison
Pavel Pervov wrote: Well, yes, harmony cannot be built with VS9 OOB. But it may be the right time to enable it. Yes! I did it myself a while back but had no chance to commit changes. AFAIR you have to update APR, and minor changes in jit are required. You can open a jira and I'll attach

Re: Harmony build - VS2008 prompt not working - vsvars32.bat error

2009-04-23 Thread Oliver Deakin
Alexei Fedotov wrote: want to know your thoughts Alexei Fedotov thinks, great job! Im thinking the same! Thanks for the info on your experiences Manju! Regards, Oliver On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Manju Vijayakumar manju.b...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, I had this weird problem

Re: [GSoC] About the community bonding period

2009-04-23 Thread Tim Ellison
Alexei Fedotov wrote: Daniel, Just a hint (maybe too obvious for modern technologically advanced students :-). You can scan the signed document and e-mail a pdf. Yep, snail mail, fax, or scanned PDF is fine for the ACQ which is a project questionnaire. My preference for a scanned document,

Re: [GSoC] About the community bonding period

2009-04-23 Thread Daniel Gong
Well, if I have to fax or mail ICLA, I would like to fax or mail ACQ as well. Maybe fax is a more convenient way. So I'm wondering when should I fax them? Before I fax, shall I contact some one so that the fax will be received soon after I fax them? Maybe Regis can tell me when I can fax them in

Re: [GSoC] About the community bonding period

2009-04-23 Thread Jim Yu
Hi Daniel, There is no restriction for the time to fax the ICLA. Just do it in daytime when you are convenient:-) 2009/4/23 Daniel Gong daniel.gong.fu...@gmail.com Well, if I have to fax or mail ICLA, I would like to fax or mail ACQ as well. Maybe fax is a more convenient way. So I'm wondering

Re: Harmony build - MSVS2008 - cl.exe failed

2009-04-23 Thread Manju Vijayakumar
Thanks guys. So do you suggest I revert to VS 2003 for the time being? Manju On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: Pavel Pervov wrote: Well, yes, harmony cannot be built with VS9 OOB. But it may be the right time to enable it. Yes! I did it myself a

Re: Harmony build - VS2008 prompt not working - vsvars32.bat error

2009-04-23 Thread Manju Vijayakumar
One more question, if we come across any issues, how do you guys do a quick search for related threads? I mean I just google search Harmony + error message + anything else Thanks, Manju 2009/4/23 Oliver Deakin oliver.dea...@googlemail.com Alexei Fedotov wrote: want to know your thoughts

Re: Android Javadocs

2009-04-23 Thread Jesse Wilson
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.comwrote: We Androids would love to contribute this documentation to Harmony. Alongside improving the Harmony doc at large, it brings our copy of the code closer in-sync with yours, which is a big win for us. Update: Javadoc

Re: Harmony build - VS2008 prompt not working - vsvars32.bat error

2009-04-23 Thread Sean Qiu
Markmail is a good choice. You can search previously discussion from our mailing list with it. http://harmony.markmail.org/ Best Regards Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu 2009/4/24 Manju Vijayakumar manju.b...@gmail.com One more question, if we come across any issues, how do you guys do a quick search for

Re: svn commit: r768115 - in /harmony/enhanced: common_resources/trunk/make/ jdktools/trunk/modules/jdktools/src/main/java/org/apache/harmony/tools/javac/ jdktools/trunk/modules/samsa/src/main/resou

2009-04-23 Thread Nathan Beyer
FYI - I upgrade the ECJ to the latest stable version, 3.4.2. You'll probably need to fetch dependencies again and copy the latest version to your Ant lib folder. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6170 -Nathan On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:35 PM, ndbe...@apache.org wrote: Author:

Re: svn commit: r768115 - in /harmony/enhanced: common_resources/trunk/make/ jdktools/trunk/modules/jdktools/src/main/java/org/apache/harmony/tools/javac/ jdktools/trunk/modules/samsa/src/main/resou

2009-04-23 Thread Regis
Nathan Beyer wrote: FYI - I upgrade the ECJ to the latest stable version, 3.4.2. You'll probably need to fetch dependencies again and copy the latest version to your Ant lib folder. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6170 -Nathan On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:35 PM, ndbe...@apache.org

Re: svn.apache.org - is the server down?

2009-04-23 Thread Regis
Manju Vijayakumar wrote: I am trying to connect to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/ and looks like the request is timing out to svn server? Anyone facing this problem now? (11:53 pm CDT) me too. You can try https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/ , it works for me

Re: svn.apache.org - is the server down?

2009-04-23 Thread Manju Vijayakumar
Oh! Tried the link and it still wont respond.. On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Regis xu.re...@gmail.com wrote: Manju Vijayakumar wrote: I am trying to connect to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/ and looks like the request is timing out to svn server? Anyone facing this