On 27/Oct/2009 01:24, Nathan Beyer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Charles Ditzel cldte...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Nathan. I still don't see a 64 bit Windows Harmony JVM
in the site Downloads section. [comments embedded]
On Oct 24, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
On Fri,
Jesse Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Oliver Deakin oliver.dea...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to just relax the constraints on
hysock_connect_with_timeout?
Sure, what would you suggest? I believe the reason the portlib
Jesse Wilson wrote:
Harmony Team,
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in our Java code
that frustrates me. Our Java code frequently inverts conditions from their
natural language form. From HttpURLConnectionImpl:
if (null == resHeader) {
I like literate threads from Jesse just because they recall
understanding and participation feelings. :-)
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
As I general rule (which is, of course, made to be broken as you sit in
front of the editor where it suddenly
On 26/Oct/2009 21:57, Jesse Wilson wrote:
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in our Java code
that frustrates me. Our Java code frequently inverts conditions from their
natural language form.
I'm sure we all have our own horror stories. The ones that make me
cringe are
There is a discussion on bui...@a.o about setting up a Windows build
machine as part of the ASF infrastructure.
Looks like there is a good possibility provided there are enough people
to help administer it for everyone.
Not sure what the criteria are (committer?) but I think it would be
useful
Surely will help whenever possible.
Thanks,
xiaofeng
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a discussion on bui...@a.o about setting up a Windows build
machine as part of the ASF infrastructure.
Looks like there is a good possibility provided there
On 27/Oct/2009 13:10, Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
Surely will help whenever possible.
Thanks, please let Gavin know over on the builds@ list. Once we get a
critical mass of people willing to tend the build machine then we can
get going.
Regards,
Tim
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Tim Ellison
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/Oct/2009 21:57, Jesse Wilson wrote:
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in our Java code
that frustrates me. Our Java code frequently inverts conditions from their
natural language form.
I'm
On 26/Oct/2009 20:33, Jesse Wilson (JIRA) wrote:
Logging performance improvements
Key: HARMONY-6362
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6362
Project: Harmony
Issue Type: Improvement
On 27/Oct/2009 13:35, Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/Oct/2009 21:57, Jesse Wilson wrote:
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in our Java code
that frustrates me. Our Java code frequently inverts conditions
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:21:14 +, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27/Oct/2009 13:35, Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 26/Oct/2009 21:57, Jesse Wilson wrote:
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in
Good question. We may face more and more similar cases in future as
multi-core is the trend. an ideal solution is to detect if there is
concurrent module in classpath then we load it and use the improved
implementation otherwise we go back to the original.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Tim
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
The improvement in performance is impressive. What is the contribution
made by the use of the CopyOnWriteArrayList?
CopyOnWriteArrayList is ideal for situations when the following are all
true:
- reads are frequent
-
Is this similiar to HARMONY-6269 ?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Kyle Cho (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[classlib][icu4j] simple date format in UTC seems to work differently than
IBM and Sun JDK
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
