Congratulations, Jesse! Welcome to the Harmony!
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On behalf of the PMC, I am delighted to welcome Jesse Wilson as our
newest committer on the Apache Harmony project.
Jesse has been sending in numerous patches to core areas
In message 55080442.1258095819685.javamail.j...@brutus, Ray Chen (JIRA)
writes:
Ray Chen updated HARMONY-6375:
--
Attachment: Harmony6375TestCase.java
It is a test case which can reproduce the problem
[classlib][nio]ServerSocketChannel hang when the main
Those clever guys at google wrote so code to help testing multithread
behaviour:
http://code.google.com/p/thread-weaver/
Anyone tried this? I wonder if we could use this to avoid arbitrary
sleeps that slow down our tests and potentially make them unstable?
Regards,
Mark.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Mark Hindess
mark.hind...@googlemail.comwrote:
Anyone tried this? I wonder if we could use this to avoid arbitrary
sleeps that slow down our tests and potentially make them unstable?
That's what Weaver is intended for! And it also lets you test concurrency
On 12/Nov/2009 19:20, Vijay Menon wrote:
Right, writes - even unsynchronized ones - to the same cache line are
problematic. Here's a good quick read on this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MESI_protocol. Recent Intel architectures
adapt this protocol. Here's the interesting bit:
A write
This commit breaks a couple of existing compatibility tests for
BufferedReader:
java.lang.NullPointerException: buffer is null
at java.io.BufferedReader.read(BufferedReader.java:282)
at
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
This commit breaks a couple of existing compatibility tests for
BufferedReader:
Yup, I saw this and I'm fixing it. I suspect it's just a bogus test. Sorry
about that!
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a look at the tests briefly, they are checking exception throwing
compatibility, something that we aim to maintain with the RI as rightly
or wrongly apps depend upon non-spec'd behavior.
Sorry about this guys.
Harmony team,
In the process of fixing a bug, I just checked in
SneakyThrowhttp://svn.apache.org/viewvc/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni/src/main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/util/SneakyThrow.java?revision=835972view=markup.
This is a weird API that probably won't see much use. But it
Harmony team,
I'm skeptical of the utility of being exception-priority compatible with the
RI. We have a wiki
pagehttp://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Exception-throwing_compatibility
describes
our goals, but I don't think these are worth their costs.
Recently I broke tests by breaking exception
10 matches
Mail list logo
