if they are already reliable alternatives like harmony.
Johann Sorel
-Original Message-
From: clrayc...@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:48:10 +0800
To: dev@harmony.apache.org, melans...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vote] Move Apache Harmony to the Attic
Hi,
As my understanding
: t.p.elli...@gmail.com
Sent: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:30:24 +
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] Move Apache Harmony to the Attic
On 03/11/2011 08:49, johann Sorel wrote:
You are right, if they want they can use it with this license but
still it's a source of problems. we have
:
http://harmony.markmail.org/message/bzifm5jshpviyyzz?q=public+domain
This will allow other project with bsd-like, mit, ...etc... licenses to reuse
parts of harmony more easely. Don't let all this work go to waste.
See it as a gift to the community :) .
johann sorel
-Original Message
, and probably some contributor to harmony like IBM
will have a word on this, or is it the PMC decision only ?
johann sorel
-Original Message-
From: nic...@hedhman.org
Sent: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 23:35:37 +0800
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] Move Apache Harmony to the Attic
Hello,
I had a similar concern last year when starting a project for a paradygm model.
At this time I was hesitating between Apache Harmony and Parrot VM...
and choose parrot to experiment something different from the java world.
With all the events around java, and the fact there is only
do any harm.
my 2 cents
johann sorel
-Original Message-
From: t.p.elli...@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:52:17 +
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Rebooting the Harmony project
As will be obvious to regular readers of this list, the Apache Harmony
development
with dependencies of different languages and
bytecodes, you won!
that was a long mail ... sorry :)
I hope my english wasn't too bad and that it gave ideas.
johann sorel
TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if5
