On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Nathan Beyer ndbe...@apache.org wrote:
One concept I've been working with is using annotations to describe
the tests for the purposes of exclusions and for platform definition.
The annotations can then be utilized in many ways via JUnit - method
rules, request
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Nathan Beyer ndbe...@apache.org wrote:
I've been experimenting with JUnit4 extensions in an attempt to find a
more simple approach to our basic testing needs. The two major
requirements that I see in Harmony's test infrastructure (at least the
classlib stuff)
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Charles Lee littlee1...@gmail.com wrote:
+1.
@Platform is the specified annotation or is the annotation used in junit4?
Platform and Exclude would be a custom annotations - perhaps
org.apache.harmony.test.Platform. Then there'd be a custom runner or
filter
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Nathan Beyer ndbe...@apache.org wrote:
One concept I've been working with is using annotations to describe
the tests for the purposes of exclusions and for platform definition.
The
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Charles Lee littlee1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Nathan Beyer ndbe...@apache.org wrote:
I've been experimenting with JUnit4 extensions in an attempt to find a
more simple approach to our basic testing needs. The two major
requirements
I've been experimenting with JUnit4 extensions in an attempt to find a
more simple approach to our basic testing needs. The two major
requirements that I see in Harmony's test infrastructure (at least the
classlib stuff) are - exclusions and platform-specific tests. (I'm
ignoring the
That's great. But most old test case is in JUnit 3.8 style. We can follow
the latest junit when we add the new test cases. What about the old ones?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Nathan Beyer ndbe...@apache.org wrote:
I've been experimenting with JUnit4 extensions in an attempt to find a
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Charles Lee littlee1...@gmail.com wrote:
That's great. But most old test case is in JUnit 3.8 style. We can follow
the latest junit when we add the new test cases. What about the old ones?
We've been using JUnit 4 runners for a long time now. JUnit 4 style
tests
+1.
@Platform is the specified annotation or is the annotation used in junit4?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Nathan Beyer ndbe...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Charles Lee littlee1...@gmail.com wrote:
That's great. But most old test case is in JUnit 3.8 style. We can
