from several companies and a
specification you would pay not to have to implement. Congratulations
(and heaps of thanks) to all those involved.
All the best
Chris Gray
[David Beberman]
We are a commercial JVM as well, Aicas.
Not sure that is relevant for this discussion though.
Kind of hard to tell what would be relevant to a discussion of this type.
Maybe OP meant to say, whilst there are at least a dozen implementations
of the Java VM there is currently
2011/2/27 Ray Chen clrayc...@gmail.com
Hi Jimmy,
Thank you for the information!
I have a question here, jpathwatch is in GPL license, can harmony use
that?
I am not an legal expert, just curious.
Good question Ray, and I think it's OK if the owner hold the copyright and
re-license it.
Hi Prashanth,
I believe that all these kinds of features i.e. base/sub class access
confusion, friend functions were all purposely avoided in JAVA to make
life
simple for the programmers and to get rid of crashes that might possibly
occur on supporting the same.
I agree. The simple syntax
Hi Paul,
Exactly.I suggested additionally that if it avoids patent problems,
alternative bytecode could be used instead (like Dalvik's, since it's
already widespread) as long as that doesn't block performant support of
non-Java languages on the VM - while reusing as much of Harmony's
existing
instruction sets too, the JVM is very
far from being the Last Word. But then I'm not sure that Java or JVM
compatibility is a good starting point, it would be better to look at a
more modern language design and see what kind of VM support it really
needs.
Kind regards
Chris Gray
have been in vain. For the time being I
prefer to keep the flame burning.
Best regards
Chris Gray
Hi Tim,
I think all options and opinions are open for discussion. We could
simply continue with the current goal and encourage the Apache Board to
seek the JCK license by whatever means is posible, we could modify our
goal and plan to release an uncertified Java SE runtime, or more
radically
of view I
would prefer an implementation which simply ignored the user-supplied
SecureRandom (and clearly documented this behaviour).
I also have to say that if this is the biggest unsolved problem you still
have, I'm pretty impressed.
Best regards
Chris Gray
looks like a daunting task.
Don't let me put you off though!
Best regards
Chris Gray
Hi all,
Trying to build from source (apache-harmony-5.0-src-r946978) results in
the following:
-really-download:
[echo] Fetching depends/jars/xerces_2.9.1/xerces.zip
[get] Getting:
http://www.apache.org/dist/xml/xerces-j/Xerces-J-bin.2.9.1.zip
[get] To:
to be
overlooked.
Greets
Chris Gray
--
Chris Gray /k/ Embedded Java Solutions
Hi Tim,
Chris Gray wrote:
snip
Note that this code doesn't even call closeEntry() on the meta-files it
encounters, and yet it still works on RI 1.4/1.6. On harmony the *.DSA and
*.SF files are simply skipped, without any entries being added to the
metaEntries map. Adding an else clause
a slow server over a chunked HTTP stream - been there, done
that), but in this case it's probably justified; arguably the JarInputStream
object is not fully constructed until the signatures have been processed.
What a mess. What a format. What an API.
Cheers
Chris
--
Chris Gray/k
will have an
idea how to fix it?
Best regards
Chris Gray /k/ Embedded Java Solutions
_
Scarlet says goodbye to download limits!
ADSL20 NO LIMIT, only 29,95
Go to www.scarlet.be for more info!
TestBundle_1.0.0.jar
Description: application/java-archive
hard to be dynamic *and* compact *and* start up fast. :-(
I suppose the Sun-defined provider mechanism only works for 100%-Java
charsets?
Regards
Chris
--
Chris Gray/k/ Embedded Java Solutions BE0503765045
Embedded Mobile Java, OSGihttp://www.k-embedded-java.com/
[EMAIL
On Monday 29 September 2008 17:46, Tim Ellison wrote:
Chris Gray wrote:
You can now go into the NIO_CHAR/make/excludesfile and specify
converters to drop from the Harmony provider. That allows you to ditch
some esoteric charsets and save footprint, and in many cases the ICU
provider has
are not in the released artefact? Real ones or just-to-make-it-compile stubs?
And afterwards do we leave those methods in the class file (so if someone
uses the method it will break at runtime), or do we bytecode-engineer them
out and hence break binary compatibility?
Regards,
Chris
--
Chris Gray
On Friday 19 September 2008 14:05, Tim Ellison wrote:
Chris Gray wrote:
On Thursday 18 September 2008 17:31, Tim Ellison wrote:
A good example. Harmony's BEANS module depends upon AWT through a
spurious public interface parameter (and the fact that BEANS carries
around the persistence
--
Chris Gray/k/ Embedded Java Solutions BE0503765045
Embedded Mobile Java, OSGihttp://www.k-embedded-java.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +32 3 216 0369
Skype: k.embedded.chris
Regrads,
Chris
--
Chris Gray/k/ Embedded Java Solutions BE0503765045
Embedded Mobile Java, OSGihttp://www.k-embedded-java.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +32 3 216 0369
Skype: k.embedded.chris
--
Chris Gray/k/ Embedded Java Solutions BE0503765045
Embedded Mobile Java, OSGihttp://www.k-embedded-java.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +32 3 216 0369
Skype: k.embedded.chris
is to 1.4, if you see what I mean. And we would be bringing a VM
which can run those classes on a lot of embedded platforms - ARM, MIPS,
PowerPC, maybe soon SH4 too.
Best regards
Chris
--
Chris Gray/k/ Embedded Java Solutions BE0503765045
Embedded Mobile Java, OSGihttp://www.k
on supporting Java5 features.
What do people think - does Mika have a role to play in Harmony or should we
just be downstream users of the Harmony classlibs?
Best rgards
Chris
--
Chris Gray/k/ Embedded Java Solutions BE0503765045
Embedded Mobile Java, OSGihttp://www.k
On Thursday 23 November 2006 07:02, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
No, it is time for lunch :)
Eh? I only just had breakfast ...
25 matches
Mail list logo
