Re: Apache HAWQ & Pivotal HDB release alignment

Hey all, Thank you so much for all the feedback and comments you provided. After considering all the feedback and thinking through further, I wanted to conclude on this topic. There is value in downstream alignment between HAWQ and commercial releases that benefit the users. We all may want to

Re: Apache HAWQ & Pivotal HDB release alignment

I would strongly caution you against trying to line up Apache HAWQ and Pivotal release numbers. My advise comes both from my role as your Apache mentor and as a Hortonworker, where we have obviously had to deal with similar issues. As you mentioned, there is significant overlap between HDB

Re: Apache HAWQ & Pivotal HDB release alignment

Hi everyone, Let me try to clarify the request if there is any confusion. The request is to move up the Apache HAWQ version to make room for HDB versioning to align with it, which is why the proposal was made in this ML. Is it reasonable to make such a request ? Well, the intention as stated

Re: Apache HAWQ & Pivotal HDB release alignment

Agree with Greg. Looks this is not an issue and should not be discussed in apache. Thanks Lei On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 3:14 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > I'm confused here. Are we voting on version numbering of a commercial > distribution of HAWQ? That would not be a concern or

Re: Apache HAWQ & Pivotal HDB release alignment

+1 Misaligned versions are always a source of major confusion. On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Shivram Mani wrote: > +1 > I don't see any negative impact in bumping up the version to 2.2. The > positive outcome from this is that we will have more frequent apache HAWQ

Re: Apache HAWQ & Pivotal HDB release alignment

I'm confused here. Are we voting on version numbering of a commercial distribution of HAWQ? That would not be a concern or in the jurisdiction of the Apache HAWQ community. Are we asking Apache HAWQ to change its version numbering to reflect that of a commercial distribution? That would not be

Re: Apache HAWQ & Pivotal HDB release alignment

-1 Whilst I agree that version alignment is important for Pivotal and users of HDB (my own self being a HDP client). We have to remember this is an open source Apache project and Pivotal are providing a downstream supported version, surely this should be a case of Pivotal aligning to the

Re: Apache HAWQ & Pivotal HDB release alignment

+1 to this recommendation. It has been a bit confusing keeping track of versions. The Apache HAWQ version update is fairly simple. Now is the time to make such an update. I imagine it will get harder the more time passes on and the more the community grows. This will impact Jira versioning for