Thanks Ted!
I wonder if it would make more sense to port it to 0.90.X or upgrade to
0.92.
Cosmin
On 2/2/12 5:03 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
HBASE-4838 ports HBASE-2856 to 0.92
FYI
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Cosmin Lehene cleh...@adobe.com wrote:
(sorry for the damaged
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Nicolas Spiegelberg
nspiegelb...@fb.com wrote:
I'm advocating that RPC compatibility breakage is not acceptable for FB
because this is a vital and highly-deployed infrastructure piece. I'm
assuming this strategy may not be acceptable for other major
Hello Everyone,
Some of you have probably been wondering about what these [89-fb] patches
that our team submits for review are, so I would like to clarify that a
little bit. We run a custom version of HBase based on 0.89 at Facebook,
codenamed 0.89-fb, but we do our best effort to submit all of
Hey Mikhail,
I believe we may have a similar concerns supporting older versions of HBase
but I think it is almost always better to fix the problem on trunk branch
first, and then backport the patch to an older version that you need to
specifically support. (such as 0.90.x in my case or in your
Hi Mikhail,
What you ask makes sense from your perspective but is difficult from
the community perspective. We're not familiar with your code base, so
it can be difficult to do a quality review on a non-trunk patch,
unless it's primarily new code.
Perhaps when there is a large patch with mostly
Hi Jonathan, Todd,
Thank you for your replies. Yes, we are aware of the fact that submitting
our patches as trunk patches first will be easier for the community. In
fact, we have been trying to do so for a significant fraction of our recent
patches, and it looks like that approach works
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
- Ram, I think if I understand the signing stuff properly, your gpg
signature needs to be verifed/signed by someone else in the web of trust.
Regarding signatures: if another committer reviews the release and is
willing to
Hi Jon
I have published my key in pub 4096R/867B57B8 in the MIT PGP public key
server.
Hope this is what you meant of publishing the key?
Regards
Ram
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:t...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:41 AM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan
ramkrishna.vasude...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi Jon
I have published my key in pub 4096R/867B57B8 in the MIT PGP public key
server.
Hope this is what you meant of publishing the key?
You've done the first part Ram.
See
