Re: TableInputFormatBase deprecated issue

2015-03-24 Thread hongbin ma
​thanks Elliott, it' very clear explanation​ On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Elliott Clark wrote: > All of the code in mapred was considered deprecated because Hadoop had been > saying for a while that org.apache.hadoo.mapreduce (as opposed to > org.apache.hadoop.mapred) would be best supporte

Re: TableInputFormatBase deprecated issue

2015-03-24 Thread Elliott Clark
All of the code in mapred was considered deprecated because Hadoop had been saying for a while that org.apache.hadoo.mapreduce (as opposed to org.apache.hadoop.mapred) would be best supported MR framework. So HBase wanted to push users to use that set of classes. However it's become pretty apparen

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-13327) Use Admin in ConnectionCache

2015-03-24 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu reopened HBASE-13327: > Use Admin in ConnectionCache > > > Key: HBASE-13327 >

TableInputFormatBase deprecated issue

2015-03-24 Thread hongbin ma
hi, all I found this class TableInputFormatBase deprecated in 0.98, but un-deprecated in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11178. I'm wondering why is the change? Does it mean we nearly discarded its support to mapred over hbase? I'm thinking about using hbase as my MR's input and sink

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13333) Renew Scanner Lease without advancing the RegionScanner

2015-03-24 Thread Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)
Lars Hofhansl created HBASE-1: - Summary: Renew Scanner Lease without advancing the RegionScanner Key: HBASE-1 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1 Project: HBase Iss

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13332) Fix the usage of doAs/runAs in Visibility Controller tests.

2015-03-24 Thread Srikanth Srungarapu (JIRA)
Srikanth Srungarapu created HBASE-13332: --- Summary: Fix the usage of doAs/runAs in Visibility Controller tests. Key: HBASE-13332 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13332 Project: HB

Re: Thinking about attempting another RC

2015-03-24 Thread Andrew Purtell
We already have HBASE-13303 as a stop gap for this release. I think it's ok if ​ HBASE-13262 isn't ready right now, we will have another release in a month. On the other hand, if it's ready before the RC is cut by all means let's get it in. Right now I'm waiting for HBASE-13326 because the issue in

Re: Thinking about attempting another RC

2015-03-24 Thread Jonathan Lawlor
Should we wait for HBASE-13262 to be in before this RC? Seems as though the change that is currently in the works would not require backporting HBASE-11544 and thus could be backported into 0.98 and branch-1.0 as well. If waiting for it to be in is not appropriate due to the need to get on top of t

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13331) Exceptions from DFS client can cause CatalogJanitor to delete referenced files

2015-03-24 Thread Elliott Clark (JIRA)
Elliott Clark created HBASE-13331: - Summary: Exceptions from DFS client can cause CatalogJanitor to delete referenced files Key: HBASE-13331 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13331 Proj

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13330) Region left unassigned due to AM & SSH each thinking the assignment would be done by the other

2015-03-24 Thread Devaraj Das (JIRA)
Devaraj Das created HBASE-13330: --- Summary: Region left unassigned due to AM & SSH each thinking the assignment would be done by the other Key: HBASE-13330 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13330

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13329) Memstore flush fails if data has always the same value, breaking the region

2015-03-24 Thread Ruben Aguiar (JIRA)
Ruben Aguiar created HBASE-13329: Summary: Memstore flush fails if data has always the same value, breaking the region Key: HBASE-13329 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13329 Project:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13328) LoadIncrementalHFile.doBulkLoad(Path,HTable) should handle managed connections

2015-03-24 Thread Enis Soztutar (JIRA)
Enis Soztutar created HBASE-13328: - Summary: LoadIncrementalHFile.doBulkLoad(Path,HTable) should handle managed connections Key: HBASE-13328 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13328 Proj

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13327) Use Admin in ConnectionCache

2015-03-24 Thread Solomon Duskis (JIRA)
Solomon Duskis created HBASE-13327: -- Summary: Use Admin in ConnectionCache Key: HBASE-13327 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13327 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-task Aff

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13326) Disabled table can't be enabled after HBase is restarted

2015-03-24 Thread Dima Spivak (JIRA)
Dima Spivak created HBASE-13326: --- Summary: Disabled table can't be enabled after HBase is restarted Key: HBASE-13326 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13326 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13325) Protocol Buffers 2.5 no longer available for download

2015-03-24 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
Andrew Purtell created HBASE-13325: -- Summary: Protocol Buffers 2.5 no longer available for download Key: HBASE-13325 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13325 Project: HBase Iss

Re: Thinking about attempting another RC

2015-03-24 Thread Andrew Purtell
Thanks. Coming tonight, then On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Anoop John wrote: > +1 for making new RC > > -Anoop- > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > Any further comment or concerns on HBASE-13303 beforehand? It is an ugly > > hack I hope to revert after we have

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13324) o.a.h.h.Coprocessor should be LimitedPrivate("Coprocessor")

2015-03-24 Thread Lars George (JIRA)
Lars George created HBASE-13324: --- Summary: o.a.h.h.Coprocessor should be LimitedPrivate("Coprocessor") Key: HBASE-13324 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13324 Project: HBase Is

Re: [DISCUSS] Dependency compatibility

2015-03-24 Thread Jonathan Hsieh
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jerry He wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: > > > We are now considered a mature project and as a "middle turtle" project > we > > need to consider the projects that we will inconvenience because > > they depend on us. All the folks i

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13323) Audit behavior heterogenous node capacity

2015-03-24 Thread Nick Dimiduk (JIRA)
Nick Dimiduk created HBASE-13323: Summary: Audit behavior heterogenous node capacity Key: HBASE-13323 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13323 Project: HBase Issue Type: Task

Re: hbase 1.1 and MOB-Feature

2015-03-24 Thread Wilm Schumacher
Hi, Am 24.03.2015 um 16:35 schrieb Nick Dimiduk: > Are you referring to the new Admin, Table, BufferedMutator interfaces? > Those are available now in 1.0. yes, and the "TableName" implementation, which abstracts the "regular" table name. I also refer e.g. to the "hbase: the definitive guide" (I

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13322) Replace explicit HBaseAdmin creation with connection#getAdmin()

2015-03-24 Thread Andrey Stepachev (JIRA)
Andrey Stepachev created HBASE-13322: Summary: Replace explicit HBaseAdmin creation with connection#getAdmin() Key: HBASE-13322 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13322 Project: HBas

Re: hbase 1.1 and MOB-Feature

2015-03-24 Thread Nick Dimiduk
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Wilm Schumacher wrote: > This will be an interesting discussion, as the API changes quite > fundamental with 2.0.0. > Are you referring to the new Admin, Table, BufferedMutator interfaces? Those are available now in 1.0.

Re: hbase 1.1 and MOB-Feature

2015-03-24 Thread Wilm Schumacher
Am 24.03.2015 um 03:07 schrieb Nick Dimiduk: > Thanks for chiming in Jon. > > I'd like to see the MOB feature included in 1.1, so long as it can be > shipped disabled by default to avoid surprises for unrelated users. I agree, but do not understand your point. MOB is something to turn on (by settin

Re: hbase 1.1 and MOB-Feature

2015-03-24 Thread Wilm Schumacher
Am 23.03.2015 um 23:23 schrieb Jonathan Hsieh: > Hi Wlim, > > I've been running the branch and hope to get it merged into with trunk/ > 2.0.0. I run it here with the 2.0.0 branch, too. But I think 1.1 is a way better plan in the long run, as the 2.0.0 release will be available in at least 10 month

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13321) Fix flaky TestHBaseFsck

2015-03-24 Thread Matteo Bertozzi (JIRA)
Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-13321: --- Summary: Fix flaky TestHBaseFsck Key: HBASE-13321 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13321 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Compo

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13320) 'hbase.bucketcache.size' configuration value is not correct in hbase-default.xml

2015-03-24 Thread Y. SREENIVASULU REDDY (JIRA)
Y. SREENIVASULU REDDY created HBASE-13320: - Summary: 'hbase.bucketcache.size' configuration value is not correct in hbase-default.xml Key: HBASE-13320 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1332

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-13319) Support 64-bits total row number in PerformanceEvaluation

2015-03-24 Thread Liu Shaohui (JIRA)
Liu Shaohui created HBASE-13319: --- Summary: Support 64-bits total row number in PerformanceEvaluation Key: HBASE-13319 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13319 Project: HBase Issue

Re: Thinking about attempting another RC

2015-03-24 Thread Anoop John
+1 for making new RC -Anoop- On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Any further comment or concerns on HBASE-13303 beforehand? It is an ugly > hack I hope to revert after we have a better fix, see tail of HBASE-11544, > but it or something like it is needed to prevent issues w

Re: Commits on master, branch-1, and 0.98 but missing from branch-1.0

2015-03-24 Thread Enis Söztutar
Yes, only bug fixes, but it is still very important to commit to all applicable branches if it is a fix. Enis On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > Got it. Thanks. > > On Monday, March 23, 2015, Stack wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Elliott Clark > > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.27 release candidate is available for download, vote closes March 26.

2015-03-24 Thread lars hofhansl
Please take a look. We're not doing many of these any more. Partly because it is very stable, partly because the developers have moved on.In any case... Take a look and vote on it. Thanks. -- Lars From: lars hofhansl To: hbase-dev Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:33 PM Subject: [VOTE]