Normalizer in 1.2+?

Hi, Just looking through the new properties and seeing this hbase.normalizer.enabled false If set to true, Master will try to keep region size within each table approximately the same. Searching both branches 1.2 and master reveals it is only used in a test to enable it,

Re: Normalizer in 1.2+?

There is RegionNormalizerTracker which tracks region normalizer state up in ZK. When user toggles normalizer switch through shell, the following method in MasterRpcServices is called: public boolean normalizerSwitch(boolean on) { boolean oldValue =

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15097) When the scan operation covered two regions,sometimes the final results have duplicated rows.

chenrongwei created HBASE-15097: --- Summary: When the scan operation covered two regions,sometimes the final results have duplicated rows. Key: HBASE-15097 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15097

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15098) Normalizer switch in configuration is not used

Lars George created HBASE-15098: --- Summary: Normalizer switch in configuration is not used Key: HBASE-15098 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15098 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

Re: Normalizer in 1.2+?

Hi Ted, Wait a minute... this means it is always on by default. Is this wanted? This is a new feature and should be tested in the field first? But you agree this is not right, so I will create a JIRA to track this. Cheers, Lars On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ted Yu

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15100) Master WALProcs still never clean up

Elliott Clark created HBASE-15100: - Summary: Master WALProcs still never clean up Key: HBASE-15100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15100 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

Re: branch-1.1.0 showed back up

INFRA-10736 was closed and I have successfully deleted this errant branch. On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > Rgr that: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10736 > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15103) hadoopcheck test should provide diff file showing what's new

Ted Yu created HBASE-15103: -- Summary: hadoopcheck test should provide diff file showing what's new Key: HBASE-15103 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15103 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15108) TestReplicationAdmin failed on branch-1.0

Heng Chen created HBASE-15108: - Summary: TestReplicationAdmin failed on branch-1.0 Key: HBASE-15108 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15108 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15101) Leak References to StoreFile.Reader after HBASE-13082

deepankar created HBASE-15101: - Summary: Leak References to StoreFile.Reader after HBASE-13082 Key: HBASE-15101 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15101 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15102) HeapMemoryTuner can "overtune" memstore size and suddenly drop it into blocking zone

Ashu Pachauri created HBASE-15102: - Summary: HeapMemoryTuner can "overtune" memstore size and suddenly drop it into blocking zone Key: HBASE-15102 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15102

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15106) Procedure V2 - Procedure Queue pass Procedure for better debuggability

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-15106: --- Summary: Procedure V2 - Procedure Queue pass Procedure for better debuggability Key: HBASE-15106 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15106

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-14944) Minimize or eliminate source incompatible changes due to HBASE-14605, HBASE-14631, and HBASE-14655

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nick Dimiduk resolved HBASE-14944. -- Resolution: Invalid Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.4) (was: 1.1.3)

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15107) Procedure V2 - Procedure Queue with Regions

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-15107: --- Summary: Procedure V2 - Procedure Queue with Regions Key: HBASE-15107 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15107 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15104) IntegrationTestAcitGuarantees occasionally fails when trying to cleanup

huaxiang sun created HBASE-15104: Summary: IntegrationTestAcitGuarantees occasionally fails when trying to cleanup Key: HBASE-15104 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15104 Project:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15105) Procedure V2 - Procedure Queue with Namespaces

Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-15105: --- Summary: Procedure V2 - Procedure Queue with Namespaces Key: HBASE-15105 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15105 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-15059) Allow 0.94 to compile against Hadoop 2.7.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey reopened HBASE-15059: - reopening, because I don't think this has all the docs needed. When attempting to build I get a

Successful: HBase Generate Website

Build status: Successful If successful, the website and docs have been generated. If failed, skip to the bottom of this email. Use the following commands to download the patch and apply it to a clean branch based on origin/asf-site. If you prefer to keep the hbase-site repo around

Re: ASF git repository policy update

no, definitely not. the "rel" space is reserved for PMC-approved releases. There's no foundation-backed need to preserve candidates that didn't get approved. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > Should we be pushing RC tags into the rel space as well as

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-14213) Ensure ASF policy compliant headers and correct LICENSE and NOTICE files in artifacts for 0.94

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey reopened HBASE-14213: - > Ensure ASF policy compliant headers and correct LICENSE and NOTICE files in > artifacts for 0.94

Re: ASF git repository policy update

Should we be pushing RC tags into the rel space as well as release tags? On Tuesday, January 12, 2016, wrote: > +1 > > > From: Enis Söztutar > > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org " > > Sent:

Re: ASF git repository policy update

ACK On Wednesday, January 13, 2016, Sean Busbey wrote: > no, definitely not. the "rel" space is reserved for PMC-approved releases. > There's no foundation-backed need to preserve candidates that didn't get > approved. > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Nick Dimiduk