Re: Hypertable claiming upto >900% random-read throughput vs HBase

2010-12-15 Thread Gaurav Sharma
Thanks Ryan and Ted. I also think if they were using tcmalloc, it would have given them a further advantage but as you said, not much is known about the test source code. On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > So if that is the case, I'm not sure how that is a fair test. One > sy

Hypertable claiming upto >900% random-read throughput vs HBase

2010-12-15 Thread Gaurav Sharma
Folks, my apologies if this has been discussed here before but can someone please shed some light on how Hypertable is claiming upto a 900% higher throughput on random reads and upto a 1000% on sequential reads in their performance evaluation vs HBase (modeled after the perf-eval test in section 7