Re: [DISCUSS] Status of the 0.98 release line

2017-04-10 Thread Yu Li
+1 to EOL. Thanks Andrew for all the great RM work! Won't forget the days 0.98 accompanied us in production (smile). Best Regards, Yu On 11 April 2017 at 03:42, Gary Helmling wrote: > +1 to EOL, and thanks to Andrew for all of the RM'ing. > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM Ted Yu wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Status of the 0.98 release line

2017-04-10 Thread Gary Helmling
+1 to EOL, and thanks to Andrew for all of the RM'ing. On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM Ted Yu wrote: > +1 > > Andrew has done tremendous work. > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Mikhail Antonov > wrote: > > > +1 to EOL 0.98. > > > > Thanks Andrew for all the work maintaining it! > > > > -Mi

Re: [DISCUSS] Status of the 0.98 release line

2017-04-10 Thread Ted Yu
+1 Andrew has done tremendous work. On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Mikhail Antonov wrote: > +1 to EOL 0.98. > > Thanks Andrew for all the work maintaining it! > > -Mikhail > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Dima Spivak > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -Dima > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:08

Re: [DISCUSS] Status of the 0.98 release line

2017-04-10 Thread Mikhail Antonov
+1 to EOL 0.98. Thanks Andrew for all the work maintaining it! -Mikhail On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Dima Spivak wrote: > +1 > > -Dima > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Stack wrote: > > > I agree we should EOL 0.98. > > St.Ack > > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Purtell

Re: [DISCUSS] Status of the 0.98 release line

2017-04-10 Thread Dima Spivak
+1 -Dima On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Stack wrote: > I agree we should EOL 0.98. > St.Ack > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > Please speak up if it is incorrect to interpret the lack of responses as > > indicating consensus on declaring 0.98 EOL. > > > > I

Re: [DISCUSS] Status of the 0.98 release line

2017-04-10 Thread Stack
I agree we should EOL 0.98. St.Ack On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Please speak up if it is incorrect to interpret the lack of responses as > indicating consensus on declaring 0.98 EOL. > > I believe we should declare 0.98 EOL. > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Sea

Re: [DISCUSS] Status of the 0.98 release line

2017-04-10 Thread Andrew Purtell
Please speak up if it is incorrect to interpret the lack of responses as indicating consensus on declaring 0.98 EOL. I believe we should declare 0.98 EOL. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Hi Folks! > > Back in January our Andrew Purtell stepped down as the release > manage

[DISCUSS] Status of the 0.98 release line

2017-03-29 Thread Sean Busbey
Hi Folks! Back in January our Andrew Purtell stepped down as the release manager for the 0.98 release line. On the resultant dev@hbase thread[1] folks seemed largely in favor of declaring end-of-maintenance for the 0.98 line. Now that it's been a couple of months, does anyone have concerns about