[VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-15 Thread Enis Söztutar
It gives me great pleasure to announce that the sixth release candidate for the release 1.0.0 (HBase-1.0.0RC5), is available for download at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.0.0RC5/ Maven artifacts are also available in the temporary repository https://repository.apache.org/con

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-16 Thread Jean-Marc Spaggiari
Hi Enis, Quick question, how do you validate the signature? Seems to be a compressed format, not sure if there is a specific command to validate it. Thanks, JM 2015-02-15 0:55 GMT-05:00 Enis Söztutar : > It gives me great pleasure to announce that the sixth release candidate for > the release

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-16 Thread Jean-Marc Spaggiari
Download and un-packed passed. Checked Changes.txt => Passed. Checked documentation => Link "Why does HBase care about /etc/hosts? " in section "Quick Start - Standalone HBase" doesn't work Run test suite => Failed 3 time in a row with JDK 1.7 Failed tests: TestNodeHea

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-16 Thread Ted Yu
bq. Did a rolling restart from 1.0.0 to 1.0.0 Did you mean from 0.98 to 1.0.0 ? Cheers On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > Download and un-packed passed. > > Checked Changes.txt => Passed. > Checked documentation => Link "Why does HBase care

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-16 Thread Jean-Marc Spaggiari
No, 1,0.0 to 1.0.0 ;) Installed 1.0.0, changed a config in a hbase-site.xml and did a rolling restart to have it taken into consideration. I still have migration from 0.94 to 1.0.0 to test, and rolling restart from 0.9x to 1.0.0... And of course, the performances... JM 2015-02-16 10:40 GMT-05:00

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-17 Thread Enis Söztutar
> > Quick question, how do you validate the signature? Seems to be a compressed > format, not sure if there is a specific command to validate it. > You can use: gpg --recv-key gpg .asc to verify the sig. https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html contains all the details. > Thanks, >

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-17 Thread Jean-Marc Spaggiari
Hum. When I do that I get a warning saying that the key might not belong to its owner... But expect this waning, I'm able to validate the hbase-1.0.0-bin.tar.gz file. Thanks, JM 2015-02-17 14:25 GMT-05:00 Enis Söztutar : > > > > Quick question, how do you validate the signature? Seems to be a

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-18 Thread Enis Söztutar
Thanks J-M for doing these tests. Some comments inlined. On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > Download and un-packed passed. > > Checked Changes.txt => Passed. > Checked documentation => Link "Why does HBase care about /etc/hosts? >

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-18 Thread Jean-Marc Spaggiari
Comments inlined too ;) > > Download and un-packed passed. > > > > Checked Changes.txt => Passed. > > Checked documentation => Link "Why does HBase care about /etc/hosts? > > " in section "Quick Start - Standalone HBase" > > doesn't work > > > > Seems like a minor iss

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-18 Thread Andrew Purtell
I'm not able to get a clean unit test run when building from source using 7u67. TestCacheOnWrite and TestSplitLogManager fail for me, maybe more but the build doesn't get past hbase-server. Maybe these are known issues? If not I'll dig in when I get some time. On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Eni

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-18 Thread Enis Söztutar
I remember both of these as flaky tests from the past, but I am not sure about their current status. https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.0/ does not have any of these two failures for the recent builds. Enis On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > I'm not able to ge

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-18 Thread Stack
Interesting. I just got a clean build on jdk1.7.0_67 (Failed in ITs). Will retry a few times. St.Ack On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > I'm not able to get a clean unit test run when building from source using > 7u67. TestCacheOnWrite and TestSplitLogManager fail for me, ma

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-18 Thread 张铎
TestCacheOnWrite itself has some problems. It uses TestHFileWriterV2.randomOrderedKey to generate a random byte array, then use first 32 bytes as row and other parts as family and qualifier, but TestHFileWriterV2.randomOrderedKey may return a byte array only contains 32 bytes, so there will be fami

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-18 Thread Enis Söztutar
Here is my RC5 testing so far: - checked checksums, sigs - checked the bin and src artifacts - checked layouts - checked java files in src tarball, and jar files in bin tarball - checked the book and the site (they are new style) - checked javadocs for both devapi and userapi - checked repo

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-19 Thread Andrew Purtell
That list is missing unit testing. Did you happen to do that when building but not mention it Enis? If so did they all pass for you? On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > Here is my RC5 testing so far: > > - checked checksums, sigs > - checked the bin and src artifacts > - c

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-19 Thread Enis Söztutar
I did not run the unit tests locally. I was relying on the following build which is 100% pass: https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.0/746/ It has the exact RC5 bits (6c98bff7b719efdb16f71606f3b7d8229445eb81). Let me kick a local UT run just in case. Enis On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:05 A

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-19 Thread Stack
+1 + Sig and MD5 verified. + Built from src tgz successfully. + Started in standalone mode. Did some clickey-clickey. All worked. + Loaded a bit of data and verified it loaded. Nothing untoward in logs. + Layout looks good. + Built bin tarball. Looks good. + Built site. Javadoc, doc., and site loo

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-19 Thread Andrew Purtell
Maybe its just me On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > I did not run the unit tests locally. I was relying on the following build > which is 100% pass: > > https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.0/746/ > > It has the exact RC5 bits (6c98bff7b719efdb16f71606f3b7d82294

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-20 Thread Enis Söztutar
Thanks for tests and votes so far. Here is my official +1 (see above for my tests). I was inspecting a similar issue today in the cluster with IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify with destructive CM, and the log splitting did not finish in 3 attempts. I think the issue is a not that critical though, I t

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-20 Thread 张铎
See HBASE-13070, I found the problem finally. It is a testcase issue so I do not think it should block a release. 2015-02-20 10:12 GMT+08:00 Andrew Purtell : > Maybe its just me > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Enis Söztutar > wrote: > > > I did not run the unit tests locally. I was relyi

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-20 Thread Ted Yu
+1 Checked signatures Ran test suite - passed Ran basic shell commands - passed Compiled Hive against maven artifacts. Cheers On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > It gives me great pleasure to announce that the sixth release candidate for > the release > 1.0.0 (HBase-1.0.0RC

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-20 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 - Checked sums and signature - Source and binary tarball layouts look ok - Spot checked docs - Built from source - All unit tests pass (7u75) - Most integration tests pass in the verification phase of hbase-it (I failed to pass -DskipITs to the build), except IntegrationTestIngestWithACL, which

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-20 Thread Elliott Clark
+1 Checked signature Checked source and binary tars All unit tests passed on JDK 7 ITBLL worked and passed. On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 > > - Checked sums and signature > - Source and binary tarball layouts look ok > - Spot checked docs > - Built from source > - A

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-20 Thread Sean Busbey
+1 (non-binding) * verified src signature (using http://www.apache.org/dist/hbase/KEYS) * verified licenses (with apache-rat:check and by inspecting LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt) * built Apache Hive against RC artifacts and ran through the HBase Handler qtests (works post HIVE-9706, currently slated

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-20 Thread Jeffrey Zhong
+1. I have compiled & run Phoenix master branch code(with some code changes) on top of Hbase 1.0.0. All Phoenix tests are passed and one issue is found(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13077) Thanks, -Jeffrey On 2/20/15, 12:38 AM, "Enis Söztutar" wrote: >Thanks for tests and votes s

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-21 Thread Enis Söztutar
> > > > * the source tarball does not match the git tag (ignoring dot files). > > source tarball has these files that are not in the git tag: > Only in /Users/busbey/Downloads/hbase-1.0.0/dev-support: > test-patch.properties.orig > Only in /Users/busbey/Downloads/hbase-1.0.0/dev-support: test-patch

Re: [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-21 Thread Sean Busbey
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > > > > > git tag has this directory that is not in source tarball: > > Only in .: hbase-native-client > > > > This is interesting. We've never added this to the release tarball it > seems. Given that there is no usage (not sure why we even ha

[RESULT] [VOTE] Sixth release candidate for HBase 1.0.0 (RC5) is available. Please vote by Feb 19 2015

2015-02-21 Thread Enis Söztutar
Thanks for everybody who tested the release and voted. The vote passes with 7 +1's (6 binding). I'll push out the artifacts now and the send a release notes Sunday. Enis On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Jeffrey Zhong wrote: > > +1. I have compiled & run Phoenix master branch code(with some co