thanks, Anoop, if you can port the HBASE-10619 to branch-1, that would be
good.
Thanks
Stephen
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Anoop John anoop.hb...@gmail.com wrote:
My bad.. Copied wrong Jira id.. It is *HBASE-10619*
-Anoop-
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Anoop John
My bad.. Copied wrong Jira id.. It is *HBASE-10619*
-Anoop-
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Anoop John anoop.hb...@gmail.com wrote:
HBASE-13158 speaks abt this.. Sorry I missed this completely. I will
work on a new patch for this.
-Anoop-
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Jerry He
HBASE-13158 speaks abt this.. Sorry I missed this completely. I will
work on a new patch for this.
-Anoop-
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Jerry He jerry...@gmail.com wrote:
The acl table and label tables are currently guarded in the
AccessController or VisibilityController. As Srikanth
The acl table and label tables are currently guarded in the
AccessController or VisibilityController. As Srikanth mentioned, it is
related to HBASE-13336.
Should we avoid duplicate checking and make the logic/responsibility clear?
The problem probably also exist for the delete/alter/modify table
yes, my proposed change is that do the 'tableName.isSystemTable ()' check,
instead of 'tableName.equals(TableName.META_TABLE_NAME)' - this check would
include all tables inside the hbase namespace.
Thanks
Stephen
By the way, we should rename the 'hbase' namespace to 'system' namespace to
make it
makes sense.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Jiang syuanjiang...@gmail.com
wrote:
In disable table, we specifically check whether it is a META table; if a
table is a META table, we disallow the table disable. However, I think
other system tables should have the same treatment (is it
In disable table, we specifically check whether it is a META table; if a
table is a META table, we disallow the table disable. However, I think
other system tables should have the same treatment (is it possible that a
namespace table is disable and the system is still functional without
issue?).
Nice idea. Related: HBASE-13336.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Apr 2, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote:
makes sense.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Jiang syuanjiang...@gmail.com
wrote:
In disable table,
+1 disabling the visibility label table is going to be a bad time.
Maybe just disallow for the whole hbase namespace?
--
Sean
On Apr 2, 2015 5:54 PM, Stephen Jiang syuanjiang...@gmail.com wrote:
In disable table, we specifically check whether it is a META table; if a
table is a META table,
+1
On Apr 2, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote:
makes sense.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Jiang syuanjiang...@gmail.com
wrote:
In disable table, we specifically check whether it is a META table; if a
table is a META table, we disallow the table
10 matches
Mail list logo
