Re: HBASE-5898 & 0.92.2

2012-12-11 Thread Shrijeet Paliwal
We might be facing HBASE-3622 . Recently removed the UseMemBar from our GC opts. I will bring it back & see if the issue gets resolved. On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > >> I don't know whether CDH3u0 is close to hd

Re: HBASE-5898 & 0.92.2

2012-12-11 Thread Shrijeet Paliwal
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > I don't know whether CDH3u0 is close to hdfs 1.0.3 or 1.0.4 > Ted, CDH3u0 does not have HDFS-2246 (Shortcut a local client reads to a Datanodes files directly) I think it is included in CDH3u3.

Re: HBASE-5898 & 0.92.2

2012-12-11 Thread Shrijeet Paliwal
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > This really looks like the issue we got that prompted applying HBASE-5898. > > Never heard about the rumor. > Was referring to Stack's comment http://goo.gl/1dMVb > > If you can isolate the region that exhibits the issue, put it on a

Re: HBASE-5898 & 0.92.2

2012-12-11 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
This really looks like the issue we got that prompted applying HBASE-5898. Never heard about the rumor. If you can isolate the region that exhibits the issue, put it on a region server by itself and patch that region server to see if it fixes the issue. Also, can you confirm that you are running

Re: HBASE-5898 & 0.92.2

2012-12-11 Thread Ted Yu
Have you seen Lars' comment today on the JIRA ? I don't know whether CDH3u0 is close to hdfs 1.0.3 or 1.0.4 Cheers On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > Done https://gist.github.com/4261746 > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > Shrijeet: > > The atta

Re: HBASE-5898 & 0.92.2

2012-12-11 Thread Shrijeet Paliwal
Done https://gist.github.com/4261746 On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Shrijeet: > The attachment didn't go through. > > Can you use pastebin ? > > Thanks > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > If our read of https://issues.apach

Re: HBASE-5898 & 0.92.2

2012-12-11 Thread Ted Yu
Shrijeet: The attachment didn't go through. Can you use pastebin ? Thanks On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > Hello All, > > If our read of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898 is > correct it talks about three issues: > > #1 Contention on a lock causing bad

HBASE-5898 & 0.92.2

2012-12-11 Thread Shrijeet Paliwal
Hello All, If our read of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898 is correct it talks about three issues: #1 Contention on a lock causing bad performance #2 HDFS slowness causing IPC handlers blocked for large times. #3 A mysterious bug which causes what looks like a deadlock In out env