On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 16:27 +0100, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019 um 16:21 Uhr
> > Von: "Oleg Kalnichevski"
> > An: "HttpComponents Project"
> > Betreff: Re: Re: Formal code reviews and PRs
> >
> >
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019 um 16:21 Uhr
> Von: "Oleg Kalnichevski"
> An: "HttpComponents Project"
> Betreff: Re: Re: Formal code reviews and PRs
>
> On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 16:12 +0100, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2019-02-14 a
On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 16:12 +0100, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 09:14 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > That sounds nice.
> > >
> > > Can we agree to add trivial changes to master directly, for
> > > example,
> > > if I
> > > want to Javadoc a previously undocumented method?
> >
> On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 09:14 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > That sounds nice.
> >
> > Can we agree to add trivial changes to master directly, for example,
> > if I
> > want to Javadoc a previously undocumented method?
> >
>
> I disagree rather strongly, especially if we want to keep master bran
Absolutely!
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019 um 15:14 Uhr
> Von: "Gary Gregory"
> An: "HttpComponents Project"
> Betreff: Re: Formal code reviews and PRs
>
> That sounds nice.
>
> Can we agree to add trivial changes to master directly, for example, if I
> want to Javadoc a previously un
