Re: site deployment

2008-02-22 Thread sebb
On 22/02/2008, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21.02.2008, at 21:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi Erik, > > > > from your other mail: > >> Wouldn't it work to simply build the sites as > >> usual (mvn site:site), then check in the target > >> directories and pull those onto pe

Re: site deployment

2008-02-22 Thread Erik Abele
On 21.02.2008, at 21:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Erik, from your other mail: Wouldn't it work to simply build the sites as usual (mvn site:site), then check in the target directories and pull those onto people.apache.org? It might work, until you have to run "mvn clean" to make sure that

Re: site deployment

2008-02-21 Thread ossfwot
Hi Erik, from your other mail: > Wouldn't it work to simply build the sites as > usual (mvn site:site), then check in the target > directories and pull those onto people.apache.org? It might work, until you have to run "mvn clean" to make sure that all pages are regenerated. That will delete your

Re: site deployment

2008-02-21 Thread Erik Abele
On 17.02.2008, at 20:10, Roland Weber wrote: Hi Erik, Btw, we really need to change the deployment for the website from Maven scp to a SVN checkout - this is a) a infra requirement [1] and b) will make sure that those things don't happen. The only downside is that we need to keep a copy o

Re: site deployment

2008-02-21 Thread Erik Abele
On 10.02.2008, at 21:24, Roland Weber wrote: Hi Erik, Btw, we really need to change the deployment for the website from Maven scp to a SVN checkout - this is a) a infra requirement [1] and b) will make sure that those things don't happen. The only downside is that we need to keep a copy o

Re: site deployment

2008-02-17 Thread Roland Weber
Hi Erik, Btw, we really need to change the deployment for the website from Maven scp to a SVN checkout - this is a) a infra requirement [1] and b) will make sure that those things don't happen. The only downside is that we need to keep a copy of the generated stuff in SVN but that was discuss

Re: site deployment docs

2008-02-17 Thread Roland Weber
Hi Sebastian, Erik, sebb wrote: On 11/02/2008, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: a) site b) Wiki I for one always prefer the website - IMHO the wiki is just a scratchpad for quick and un-finished docs; as soon as they are more mature they should be promoted to "site-status" :-) I think

Re: site deployment docs

2008-02-11 Thread sebb
On 11/02/2008, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 28.12.2007, at 08:45, Roland Weber wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > I intend to collect information on generating and deploying > > the various parts of our website one of these days. What is > > your preferred location for this documentation?

Re: site deployment docs

2008-02-11 Thread Erik Abele
On 28.12.2007, at 08:45, Roland Weber wrote: Hi folks, I intend to collect information on generating and deploying the various parts of our website one of these days. What is your preferred location for this documentation? a) site b) Wiki I for one always prefer the website - IMHO the wiki i

Re: site deployment

2008-02-10 Thread Roland Weber
Hi Erik, Btw, we really need to change the deployment for the website from Maven scp to a SVN checkout - this is a) a infra requirement [1] and b) will make sure that those things don't happen. The only downside is that we need to keep a copy of the generated stuff in SVN but that was discuss

site deployment

2008-02-10 Thread Erik Abele
On 10.02.2008, at 14:50, Erik Abele wrote: ... Btw, we really need to change the deployment for the website from Maven scp to a SVN checkout - this is a) a infra requirement [1] and b) will make sure that those things don't happen. The only downside is that we need to keep a copy of the ge

site deployment docs

2007-12-27 Thread Roland Weber
Hi folks, I intend to collect information on generating and deploying the various parts of our website one of these days. What is your preferred location for this documentation? a) site b) Wiki cheers, Roland - To unsubscribe