[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14287064#comment-14287064
]
Lefty Leverenz commented on HIVE-9253:
--
On the Review Board I raised a naming issue ab
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14287036#comment-14287036
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-9428:
---
{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed
H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14287027#comment-14287027
]
Navis commented on HIVE-9412:
-
Verified with result from postgres
{noformat}
value | min | m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14287025#comment-14287025
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-9439:
---
{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed
H
I strongly believe that the concept of 1.0 out of a branch as proposed is
creating the greatest confusion in the community. If for any reason that
1.0 cannot be cut from the trunk, that means that we are not ready and so
shall wait until so before considering such a release. Thus, I'd -1 on this
p
On 1/21/15, 7:09 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
Too be clear I strongly feel creating 1.0 from 0.14 will be confusing. In
fact it's already crrated confusion amongst folks on this list. Furthermore
1.0 should be created from trunk and be a superset of previous releases.
I don't think there is any con
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286990#comment-14286990
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-9139:
---
{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed
H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chao updated HIVE-9152:
---
Attachment: (was: HIVE-9152.1-spark.patch)
> Dynamic Partition Pruning [Spark Branch]
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286974#comment-14286974
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-9436:
---
{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed
H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chao updated HIVE-9152:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Dynamic Partition Pruning [Spark Branch]
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chao updated HIVE-9152:
---
Attachment: HIVE-9152.1-spark.patch
A initial implementation. Note this isn't the final version yet.
> Dynamic Partiti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Szehon Ho updated HIVE-9426:
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: spark-branch
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-5700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286954#comment-14286954
]
Brock Noland commented on HIVE-5700:
There is a similar problem to HIVE-8730 on postgre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286944#comment-14286944
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-9426:
---
{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed
H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dong Chen updated HIVE-9253:
Attachment: HIVE-9253.3.patch
Update v3
> MetaStore server should support timeout for long running requests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286921#comment-14286921
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-6617:
---
{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed
H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286920#comment-14286920
]
Chengxiang Li commented on HIVE-9410:
-
By the way, enhanced qtest is not ready yet.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286919#comment-14286919
]
Alexander Pivovarov commented on HIVE-9402:
---
2 errors in tests - group_by and aut
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30107/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2015, 3:54 a.m.)
Review request for hive and Xuefu Zhang.
B
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chengxiang Li updated HIVE-9410:
Attachment: HIVE-9410.2-spark.patch
[~xhao1], I updated the patch, and it passed my BigBench environm
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30107/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2015, 3:53 a.m.)
Review request for hive and Xuefu Zhang.
B
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rui Li updated HIVE-9428:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> LocalSparkJobStatus may return failed job as successful [Spark Branch]
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rui Li updated HIVE-9428:
-
Attachment: HIVE-9428.2-spark.patch
Call future.get() to test is a future is successful.
> LocalSparkJobStatus may
Dong Chen created HIVE-9442:
---
Summary: Make sure all data types work for PARQUET
Key: HIVE-9442
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9442
Project: Hive
Issue Type: Sub-task
R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Hyde updated HIVE-9441:
--
Assignee: Ashutosh Chauhan
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Remove call to deprecated Calcite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xuefu Zhang updated HIVE-9289:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: spark-branch
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Hyde updated HIVE-9441:
--
Attachment: HIVE-9441.1.patch
> Remove call to deprecated Calcite method
> --
Vikram,
Sorry about the confusion. That link misses the content to which I was
replying. I agree that 1.0 should be stable, but that does not mean that I
agree that 1.0 should come from 0.14. Here is one with the content to which
I was replying:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hive-dev/2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286877#comment-14286877
]
Xuefu Zhang commented on HIVE-9409:
---
+1
> Avoid ser/de loggers as logging framework can
Julian Hyde created HIVE-9441:
-
Summary: Remove call to deprecated Calcite method
Key: HIVE-9441
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9441
Project: Hive
Issue Type: Bug
Rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286876#comment-14286876
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-9289:
---
{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed
H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286832#comment-14286832
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-9402:
---
{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed
H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286824#comment-14286824
]
Prasanth Jayachandran commented on HIVE-9392:
-
This patch uses the tag number i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanth Jayachandran updated HIVE-9392:
Attachment: HIVE-9392.1.patch
> JoinStatsRule miscalculates join cardinality as incor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanth Jayachandran updated HIVE-9392:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> JoinStatsRule miscalculates join cardinality a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286808#comment-14286808
]
Ashutosh Chauhan commented on HIVE-9412:
These clauses have a bit tricky semantics.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286795#comment-14286795
]
Ashutosh Chauhan commented on HIVE-9341:
can you also update RB with test changes.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashutosh Chauhan updated HIVE-9416:
---
Attachment: HIVE-9416.1.patch
WIP patch. Got rid of it from genPlan(). Some optimizer still ref
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashutosh Chauhan updated HIVE-9416:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Get rid of Extract Operator
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashutosh Chauhan updated HIVE-9416:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> Get rid of Extract Operator
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286783#comment-14286783
]
Rui Li commented on HIVE-9409:
--
I don't think the failures are related.
> Avoid ser/de logger
@Brock,
I created this branch from 0.14. I created this branch based on the email
thread discussing 1.0,
http://search-hadoop.com/m/8er9YGX8g2
where you had said you agreed with the suggestion from Enis from HBase who
said that we should base 1.0 on a stable version rather than making it a
featu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chengxiang Li updated HIVE-9370:
Summary: SparkJobMonitor timeout as sortByKey would launch extra Spark job
before original job get su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286744#comment-14286744
]
Rui Li commented on HIVE-9409:
--
That's good to know. Thank you Xin!
> Avoid ser/de loggers as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286742#comment-14286742
]
Chengxiang Li commented on HIVE-9410:
-
The udf_example_add.q query got a Limit 1, so it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Gates updated HIVE-9271:
-
Fix Version/s: 0.15.0
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Add ability for client to request m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286740#comment-14286740
]
Alan Gates commented on HIVE-9271:
--
Yes, you could use alter partition touch. However, th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Gates updated HIVE-9271:
-
Attachment: HIVE-9271.patch
> Add ability for client to request metastore to fire an event
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brock Noland updated HIVE-8121:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.15.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Szehon Ho updated HIVE-9426:
Attachment: HIVE-9246.3-spark.patch
As precommit tests havent run, getting the very latest changes.
> Merge
Hi Lefty,
Yes, you are right. Anything that is not fixed in 0.14 and is fixed in
1.0 would have 1.0 as the fixed version.
Yes, 0.15.0 would then become 1.1.0 .
Yes, it is a good idea to document this translation somewhere.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Lefty Leverenz wrote:
> So my initial i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286719#comment-14286719
]
Alan Gates commented on HIVE-9359:
--
+1.
> Export of a large table causes OOM in Metastore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Szehon Ho updated HIVE-9435:
Component/s: Tests
Affects Version/s: 0.15.0
Fix Version/s: 0.15.0
Issue Type: Te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Szehon Ho updated HIVE-9435:
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Committed to trunk to fix the test failure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286708#comment-14286708
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-9435:
---
{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed
H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286702#comment-14286702
]
Brock Noland commented on HIVE-9438:
Caused by HIVE-9122.
> The standalone-jdbc jar mi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brock Noland updated HIVE-9438:
---
Attachment: HIVE-9438.1.patch
> The standalone-jdbc jar missing some jars
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brock Noland updated HIVE-9438:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> The standalone-jdbc jar missing some jars
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ferdinand Xu updated HIVE-9371:
---
Attachment: HIVE-9371.1.patch
> Execution error for Parquet table and GROUP BY involving CHAR data type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ferdinand Xu updated HIVE-9371:
---
Attachment: HIVE-9371.patch
Reupload my patch to kick off the precommit.
> Execution error for Parquet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286680#comment-14286680
]
Xuefu Zhang edited comment on HIVE-9437 at 1/22/15 12:56 AM:
-
P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286680#comment-14286680
]
Xuefu Zhang edited comment on HIVE-9437 at 1/22/15 12:56 AM:
-
P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286680#comment-14286680
]
Xuefu Zhang commented on HIVE-9437:
---
Patch looks good. It seems missing : after ${hadoopC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brock Noland updated HIVE-9437:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Beeline does not add any existing HADOOP_CLASSPATH
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brock Noland updated HIVE-9437:
---
Attachment: HIVE-9437.1.patch
> Beeline does not add any existing HADOOP_CLASSPATH
> --
Apache website talks about it. Looks like attribution is required,
which means you will need to add a reference to this inclusion in the
NOTICE file.
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#can-works-placed-in-the-public-domain-be-included-in-apache-products
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Ser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dong Chen reassigned HIVE-9434:
---
Assignee: Dong Chen
> Shim the method Path.getPathWithoutSchemeAndAuthority
>
As discussed in the previous thread [1] I don't see why it would be
horribly confusing to have- 1.0.0 = 0.14 + changes to delete things
due to deprecation + additional API documentation. 0.15 would then
become 1.1.0 .
I should be able to submit some patches for documenting public APIs by
tomorrow.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sushanth Sowmyan updated HIVE-9359:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> Export of a large table causes OOM in Metastore and Clie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sushanth Sowmyan updated HIVE-9359:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Export of a large table causes OOM in Metastore and Clie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sushanth Sowmyan updated HIVE-9359:
---
Attachment: HIVE-9359.2.patch
Updated patch to use JsonGenerator.
> Export of a large table ca
This was done previously, but they reappeared. Maybe second time's a charm.
-- Lefty
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Thank you Ashutosh!
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan
> wrote:
>
> > Done. I have removed two offending ids from list.
> >
> > On Wed
Now that HCatalog is part of the Hive project, messages about HCATALOG-###
issues should go to dev@hive.apache.org.
-- Lefty
-- Forwarded message --
From: Manish Malhotra (JIRA)
Date: Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:27 AM
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HCATALOG-541) The meta store client th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286622#comment-14286622
]
Xuefu Zhang commented on HIVE-9440:
---
+1 pending on tests.
> Folders may not be pruned fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Navis updated HIVE-9341:
Attachment: HIVE-9341.4.patch.txt
> Apply ColumnPrunning for noop PTFs
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Navis updated HIVE-9412:
Attachment: HIVE-9412.3.patch.txt
> Window clause ROW BETWEEN for PRECEDING does not work
> -
Thank you Ashutosh!
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan
wrote:
> Done. I have removed two offending ids from list.
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
>
> > Seriously, these guys are still spamming this list? Why hasn't the
> dev-list
> > admin booted these re
Done. I have removed two offending ids from list.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Seriously, these guys are still spamming this list? Why hasn't the dev-list
> admin booted these receivers yet? It's been *months*.
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:19 PM, wrote:
>
> > Failed t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jimmy Xiang updated HIVE-9440:
--
Attachment: HIVE-9440.1.patch
> Folders may not be pruned for Hadoop 2
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jimmy Xiang updated HIVE-9440:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Folders may not be pruned for Hadoop 2
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brock Noland updated HIVE-9408:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.15.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brock Noland updated HIVE-1869:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.15.0
> TestMTQueries failing on jenkins
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brock Noland updated HIVE-1869:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Thank you Xuefu! I have committed th
Jimmy Xiang created HIVE-9440:
-
Summary: Folders may not be pruned for Hadoop 2
Key: HIVE-9440
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9440
Project: Hive
Issue Type: Bug
Repor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286564#comment-14286564
]
Brock Noland commented on HIVE-9426:
Note that message at debug level and is just sayin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286563#comment-14286563
]
Brock Noland commented on HIVE-9426:
Note that message at debug level and is just sayin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286561#comment-14286561
]
Hive QA commented on HIVE-9327:
---
{color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed
H
Hi,
I should have just waited to check where this branch came from, but I
was quite surprised when I received this mail so I too quickly fired
off a response. I apologize to everyone for the spam. The reason I was
surprised is that I don't feel there was a consenus comming out of the
1.0 discussio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286546#comment-14286546
]
Szehon Ho commented on HIVE-9426:
-
EncryptedHDFSCliDriver failure is due to:
{noformat}
2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Szehon Ho updated HIVE-9426:
Attachment: HIVE-9426.2-spark.patch
Trying again, after revert of HIVE-9272.
auto_join21 failure is tracke
So my initial impression was correct -- instead of calling it release
0.14.1, we're calling it 1.0.0. Or am I hopelessly confused?
Will 0.15.0 be 1.1.0? (If so, I'll need to edit a dozen wikidocs.)
Will release numbers get changed in JIRA issues? Presumably that's not
possible in old comments,
Because there's no binary library as far as I can tell (see original
message)
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> I guess the PMC should be responsive to this kind of question.
>
> Can you not depend on a library containing these files? Why include the
> source directly?
>
> O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286534#comment-14286534
]
Vikram Dixit K commented on HIVE-9235:
--
+1 for branch 1.0 as well.
> Turn off Parquet
Seriously, these guys are still spamming this list? Why hasn't the dev-list
admin booted these receivers yet? It's been *months*.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:19 PM, wrote:
> Failed to deliver to 'bsc...@ebuddy.com'
> SMTP module(domain mail-in.ebuddy.com:25) reports:
> host mail-in.ebuddy.com:25
I guess the PMC should be responsive to this kind of question.
Can you not depend on a library containing these files? Why include the
source directly?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Sergey Shelukhin
wrote:
> Ping? Where do I write about such matters if not here.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286518#comment-14286518
]
Szehon Ho commented on HIVE-9264:
-
Also a doc note: as Sergio pointed out to me, you need t
Ping? Where do I write about such matters if not here.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Sergey Shelukhin
wrote:
> Suppose I want to use a Java source within Hive that has this header (I
> don't now, but I was considering it and may want it later ;)):
>
> /*
> * Written by Doug Lea with assista
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Szehon Ho updated HIVE-9337:
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> Move more hive.spark.* configurations to HiveConf [Spark Branch]
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14286492#comment-14286492
]
Thejas M Nair commented on HIVE-9350:
-
[~prasadm] FYI, this patch introduces a small ch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30146/
---
Review request for hive and Jason Dere.
Bugs: HIVE-9350
https://issues.apac
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
