Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

Great! Thank you, Owen and Panos! Bests, Dongjoon. On 2021/07/26 16:45:38, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > Thanks, Dongjoon. > > I've committed the fix to master and storage-branch-2.8. Given that I > wanted to get HIVE-25190 released, > I'll roll RCs for 2.8.1 and 2.7.3 today. > > .. Owen > > On

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

Thanks, Dongjoon. I've committed the fix to master and storage-branch-2.8. Given that I wanted to get HIVE-25190 released, I'll roll RCs for 2.8.1 and 2.7.3 today. .. Owen On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 8:36 AM Panos Garefalakis wrote: > Thanks Dongjoon for the details! > Looks like we are going to

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

Thanks Dongjoon for the details! Looks like we are going to need a follow-up release sooner than later! On the positive side, HIVE-25386 passed tests and we can now move forward. Cheers, Panagiotis On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 9:56 AM Dongjoon Hyun wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

Hi, All. It turns out that 2.8.0 has a regression in terms of the dependency although it passed all tests. At Apache Hive 2.2.0, HIVE-13906 removed the Guava compile dependency. However, recently, HIVE-24542 converts the test dependency to the compile dependency.

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

I can do the publishing. Thank you all! .. Owen On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:16 AM Panos Garefalakis wrote: > Thank you all for your help! With 3 binding votes this release passed! > I am going to send a vote result follow up but will need some PMC help > creating the new Storage API version (on

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

Thank you all for your help! With 3 binding votes this release passed! I am going to send a vote result follow up but will need some PMC help creating the new Storage API version (on Jira) and releasing (upload artifacts)! Cheers, Panagiotis On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 2:21 AM Chao Sun wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

Thanks Owen! I just verified the checksum and gpg signature and they both look good, so +1 too. Panos: please fix the "Fix version" of the JIRA when you get a chance. Thanks. Best, Chao On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:29 PM Owen O'Malley wrote: > Chao, >Panos key doesn't seem to have

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

Chao, Panos key doesn't seem to have propagated to the Apache servers. It referenced here: https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ as "pgaref 7DFAB216AB7D96B3B2072184DC11DE4D00F8FA1D" The key itself can be found here: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=pgaref=on=index On Wed,

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

I built the source from the branch and ran the tests, which all passed. However I was not able to find the public GPG key. Panos: could you point me to the location? Also seems we should create a new version 2.8.0 in the JIRA page:

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

+1 (binding) * Built module * Ran tests * Checked artifact checksum and signature Thanks Szehon On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 2:11 PM Owen O'Malley wrote: > I think we should go ahead and release storage-api 2.8.0 and catch it on > the next cycle. HIVE-25190 is a long standing bug that rarely

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

I think we should go ahead and release storage-api 2.8.0 and catch it on the next cycle. HIVE-25190 is a long standing bug that rarely affects users. (We have had a user at LinkedIn hit it, which is why I fixed it.) I'll sign up to make the 2.8.1 (and 2.7.3) bug fix releases afterwards. .. Owen

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

Going to check the release and vote here too. Since HIVE-25190 is already merged, instead of waiting for another release, should we start another RC1 with that included? Chao On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 1:30 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > +1 > > * Build and tested locally. > > Thanks, > Dongjoon. > >

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

+1 * Build and tested locally. Thanks, Dongjoon. On 2021/07/19 23:15:46, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > +1 (binding): > * Built and tested > * Built hive main branch using it > * Verified signatures and checksums > > It is too bad that we didn't get HIVE-25190 into it, but that can wait for >

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

+1 (binding): * Built and tested * Built hive main branch using it * Verified signatures and checksums It is too bad that we didn't get HIVE-25190 into it, but that can wait for 2.8.1. .. Owen On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:44 PM Pavan Lanka wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I have done the following:

Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

+1 (non-binding) I have done the following: * Built and Tested storage-release-2.8.0-rc0 using OpenJDK8 * Built and Tested ORC with updated storage api version - Had to fix a test class that implements PredicateLeaf which has a new method. This is a breaking change but I think this should be

[VOTE] Should we release Hive Storage API 2.8.0-rc0 ?

Hello all, Following on previous discussions, I would like to propose a new storage-api release including HIVE-24458 . Shall we release the following artifacts as Hive Storage API 2.8.0? tar: http://home.apache.org/~pgaref/hive-storage-2.8.0/