Hi guys,
I've been trying to port some of the c-modules to Apache 1.3, and before I
go any further I thought I'd check that I haven't done anything stupid :-)
Attached to the bottom is my patch to mod_random_chunk; I haven't managed
to test it fully since my LWP is too old (is 5.5396 a CVS
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And Brian, please move your mod_tls into modules/arch/netware/ and consider renaming
it (work winsock or ws into the name) for clarity, since tls is a very broad thing
that doesn't reflect how specific this module is.
Does that work for
Hello,
I'm looking in detail how apache logs to the access.log
file. I do not know whether it is my misconfiguration
or not, but whats happen when someone download file
and then skip the downloading process? My results
show that apache logs this (interrupted) download
with number of how many
* On 2001-08-10 at 19:43,
Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say:
In response to a private query, I worked up a little patch
to add an enhancement to mod_auth: in addition to 'require valid-user'
and 'require user xxx yyy zzz' the enhanced version recognises
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
FWIW, I don't thinking creating a sub-project for one file makes
a lot of sense. -- justin
I agree with Justin on this, and disagree with FirstBill and Ryan.
Before we do *anything* I'd like to see:
1. General consensus
On Thursday 06 September 2001 18:21, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is pretty self explanatory...
-aaron
Index: support/apachectl.in
===
RCS file:
Hi,
I've been going through the modules/aaa directory
and found that modules there seem to implement both
authentication and authorization.
IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are
completely different things and it would be nice
to have different modules to do authentication
in a
Sander Striker wrote:
IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are
completely different things and it would be nice
to have different modules to do authentication
in a different way, but still utilize the same
authorization method.
I'm not sure if splitting them will accomplish this
Sander Striker wrote:
IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are
completely different things and it would be nice
to have different modules to do authentication
in a different way, but still utilize the same
authorization method.
I'm not sure if splitting them will accomplish
[replying to my own msg]
Sander Striker wrote:
IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are
completely different things and it would be nice
to have different modules to do authentication
in a different way, but still utilize the same
authorization method.
I'm not sure if splitting
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry for wasting the subject line but I'd just commit if I could test
properly. I'd love to see whether or not it builds on Solars 7.
This 1.3 patch allows the administrator to choose pthread for the
accept mutex mechanism on Solaris. That works
Gentlemen from Maryland wrote:
... adding a new module
... the following aspects:
In the final analysis the decision is made using the
PMC's procedures, i.e. public debate and rarely
semi-procedural voting.
These aspects inform that debate, along with others
and few of them manage to be
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:43:53PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Correct - therefore things must be straightforward, predictable, and explicable.
Having the ability to log each change to the filter chain would shortcut
a lot of help requests.
For incremental directives like the filter
Huh?
+* mod_negotiation (?): Marc's message on 23 August 2001 about
+ the .var files being read one byte at a time.
+ [Charles Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
This was fixed a while ago.
+
+* threaded MPM broken on FreeBSD
+ [Charles Randall [EMAIL
I'd like to tag and roll Apache 1.3.21. Anyone have anything they would like to get
in
first? I believe there are some proxy patches and some misc fixes to 1.3.20 and
that's
about it.
.. and the AcceptMutex directive, which was my motivation for the TR to begin with...
Not in any hurry
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to tag and roll Apache 1.3.21. Anyone have anything they would like to get
in
first?
extremely minor:
. fix a few bugs in the magic file (trailing \t which confuses the
parser and leads to an unlogged 500 error)
. allow pthread
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 06:39:17AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 22:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jerenkrantz01/09/06 22:52:29
Modified:modules/filters mod_include.c
Log:
Fix error in Netware-specific code.
(This really should be an APR
Jeff Trawick wrote:
no verification necessary...
just did so anyway under Solaris 8... Not an in-depth test, just banged
the crud out of it with 'ab' :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|]
Sander Striker wrote:
I've been going through the modules/aaa directory
and found that modules there seem to implement both
authentication and authorization.
Yar, that's a right bugger. I have had a replacement
system in my head for a couple of years now, but it
requires some substantial
* On 2001-09-07 at 11:13,
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say:
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to tag and roll Apache 1.3.21. Anyone have anything
they would like to get in first?
A couple of mod_auth things, but that should be cleared up
Farag, Hany M (Hany) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
What's the replacement functions for ap_bread() and ap_bwrite in apache 2.0
?
Well, it isn't exactly the same because of filtering but...
where network is involved (e.g., core code, mod_proxy):
core input and output filters play with
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:02:47AM -0600, Charles Randall wrote:
Since I'm not a committer, I asked Ken if he would kindly add these items to
STATUS so they wouldn't get lost. I haven't seen STATUS yet, but I didn't
intend them to be show-stoppers (though I didn't say either way, guess I
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 01-09-05 14:44:54 EDT, Marc Selmko wrote...
Why do you quote Ken's mails as coming from a Mr. Selmko? Who is
he anyway?
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
more than a billion impressions
Sorry to bother the list with this question. I searched the FAQs, but
did not find
any info about solaris 2.8 platforms. So, here is the question.
Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
-solaris 2.8, on gcc2.952 version and above
-solaris 2.8, on Forte 6.0
-solaris 2.6, on gcc2.952 version and
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
Sorry to bother the list with this question. I searched the FAQs, but
did not find
any info about solaris 2.8 platforms. So, here is the question.
Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
-solaris 2.8, on gcc2.952 version and above
-solaris 2.8, on
On Fri, 2001-09-07 at 12:33, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
Sorry to bother the list with this question. I searched the FAQs, but
did not find
any info about solaris 2.8 platforms. So, here is the question.
Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
-solaris 2.8, on gcc2.952 version and above
we use
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
Sorry to bother the list with this question. I searched the FAQs, but
did not find
any info about solaris 2.8 platforms. So, here is the question.
Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
-solaris 2.8,
On Friday 07 September 2001 18:28, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
* On 2001-09-07 at 21:21,
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say:
On Friday 07 September 2001 17:46, Greg Stein wrote:
Current consensus appears to be to add it to modules/experimental.
I don't see
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to tag and roll Apache 1.3.21. Anyone have anything they would like
to get in first? I believe there are some proxy patches and some misc fixes to
1.3.20 and that's about it. Not in any hurry but I
looking back at justin's original request.
the code was posted ~1 month ago.
he reviewed it, he thought it was OK.
and asked..
'guys.. should we have this module included?'
a simple enough question.
it then degenerated into a flame war.
It is hard to read you long and flamebait ridden
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:59 PM
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:43:53PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Because from context to context you mean to change the server config. What
works in one Location doesn't work for another, what is
From: Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:10 PM
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
When you say {Set|Add}OutputFilter, you clobber the filter chain.
as long as you can remove all filters in a subdirectory by specifying a
empty 'SetOutputfilter' (or maybe ever
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 5:25 AM
* On 2001-08-10 at 19:43,
Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say:
In response to a private query, I worked up a little patch
to add an enhancement to mod_auth: in
From: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:36 AM
I've been going through the modules/aaa directory
and found that modules there seem to implement both
authentication and authorization.
IMO this should be split. Auth and authz are
completely different
There have been requests to build mod_vhost_alias for win32. I see no
reason why we shouldn't.
There have been requests to build mod_unique_id. I see no reason to do
so, since this is a very messy module to port, and it's better done in 2.0.
There was one other module (methinks) that wasn't
From: Günter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:30 PM
Hi all,
I want to ask some questions about Apache on Win32:
- someone asked me for mod_vhost_alias on Win32, so I compiled it
and it loads into Server, but didnt test more with it; can we add
this to the 1.3
From: Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:23 PM
The attached patches change the apr_table_t implementation from
a linear list to a hash table (not an apr_hash_t, though!). With
this change, I'm seeing a ~3% improvement in throughput when
delivering a 0-byte file
In a message dated 01-09-08 01:29:57 EDT, Ian wrote...
looking back at justin's original request.
the code was posted ~1 month ago.
he reviewed it, he thought it was OK.
and asked..
'guys.. should we have this module included?'
a simple enough question.
Yes, it was... ( a
38 matches
Mail list logo
