/* this will typically exit on the first test */
for (f = r-output_filters; f != NULL; f = f-next)
if (strcasecmp(OLD_WRITE, f-frec-name) == 0)
break;
i'm puking. strcasecmp strings??
Yah :-) It could be optimized by recording a flag in the
Greg Stein wrote:
When you say placeholder, are you suggesting that you're going to commit the
code back into the httpd-2.0 branch?
Yes - in the last (long) discussion it got the needed +1's, but it was
never done.
I've delayed actually committing the thing yet to make sure people have
time
On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, at 04:01 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Rather than doing that, why don't we work on the rollup mechanism
instead?
Proxy has been moving along terrifically while in its own CVS module.
We can do this too - but then I'd say we would need to finalise the
rollup
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
My location_walk optimization (which suffers a potential bug, per
our svn friends) takes an entirely different tact, which renders
that whole idea DOA.
Ok, to rule out the possibility it is in the optimization code
I reverted to
Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* On 2001-09-07 at 11:13,
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say:
there's the boatload of ab changes which were punted from 1.3.20...
does anybody know if those are golden yet?
Judging by the [unexamined]
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 04:11:16AM -0400, Chuck Murcko wrote:
On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, at 04:01 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Rather than doing that, why don't we work on the rollup mechanism
instead?
Proxy has been moving along terrifically while in its own CVS module.
We can
Greg Stein wrote:
I'm +1 on creating httpd-rollup, and -0.5 on putting proxy back in.
Ok - first question - what do we call the rollup release:
o Option A: apache-2.x.x.tar.gz
Combines httpd-2.0, apr, apr-util, httpd-proxy and
httpd-ldap and produces an apache rollup tree.
o Option B:
i don't get it. this new ap_rsprintf is less efficient than the
ap_bsprintf in apache-1.3.
I don't doubt it. The primary intent for ap_r* was compatibility; the
most optimal mechanism for delivering content is through the new brigade
mechanisms (down thru the filter chain).
are
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] Cleaning mod_cgi.c
This allows us (on win32) to rip all of that ScriptInterpreterSource cruft from
the core, and deposit it on ourself. It allows me to build a proper argv[],
from the registry, even if the association is as odd
From: jlwpc1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:47 AM
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] Cleaning mod_cgi.c
This allows us (on win32) to rip all of that ScriptInterpreterSource cruft from
the core, and deposit it on ourself. It allows me to
Attached are the updated install-tpf.html and readme-tpf.html pages.
Due to the number of updates, and since they're just documents, I've
included the entire files for a replacement versus a patch.
(But I will produce a diff file if needed.)
It would be nice to have these updated in 1.3.21's
Not acked. -- justin
- Forwarded message from Nils B. Lahr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Nils B. Lahr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_example question...
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:23:20 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thread-Topic: mod_example question...
Thread-Index:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:10:05PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
I don't care if mod_include buffers 200 Megs, as long as it is
constantly doing something with the data. If we have a 200 Meg file
that has no SSI tags in it, but we can get all 200
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm completely uninformed here, but I've been thinking
of this for the last day or so and I don't quite understand why we wouldn't
incrementally mmap() and then munmap() different segments of the file
as we walk through it (at least for
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My $.02 - with Solaris's sendfilev, it can take in a -1 (FD_SELF or
something like that) for the file descriptor which means that you
should read starting at the offset location from your memory space.
I have comments in the Solaris-specific code
15 matches
Mail list logo
