Re: ApacheBench says my site is unstable?

2001-10-27 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Philip Mak wrote: > MaxClients is 50, so I'm guessing that the number of open files (1064) is > definitely enough to handle that, right? Your 'ab' tried to open a significantly higher number of connections if I recall. You want both to be in the same order; and open files w

Re: ApacheBench says my site is unstable?

2001-10-27 Thread Philip Mak
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > On FreeBSD; do a > > ulimit -a > > to check the number of files you are allowed to have open. For a non > privilidged user the default is tipicallyy set to 64 or some similar low > number. My limits seem to be high enough: $ ulimit -a cp

Re: ApacheBench says my site is unstable?

2001-10-27 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On FreeBSD; do a ulimit -a to check the number of files you are allowed to have open. For a non privilidged user the default is tipicallyy set to 64 or some similar low number. This is mainly to stop people from getting in each others way. I.e. one user overloading the machine for some

ApacheBench says my site is unstable?

2001-10-27 Thread Philip Mak
I'm using ApacheBench to perform stress testing on my Apache server. It's not always working, though. Observe the following two runs: (first is Broken pipe; second has some failed requests) [pmak@sg1 bin]$ ./ab -n 1000 -c 10 http://65.119.108.120:8080/ This is ApacheBench, Version 1.3c <$Revision

Re: Problems with Keep-Alive and still not exiting childs

2001-10-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 7:06 PM > this problem is Cygwin 1.x specific, but I'm ask the list for a hint > on where I can start figuring out what we have here: > > On the Cygwin 1.x platform (running both 1.1.8-2 and 1.3.3-2) I have > the following

[PATCH] pre-merge optimization for directory_walk and location_walk

2001-10-27 Thread Brian Pane
[This is a repost of an uncommitted patch from earlier this month. I've re-diffed against the latest code in CVS so that it will apply cleanly. The patch yields a reduction of about 15% in usr CPU utilization (test case: shtml request with two subrequests).] This patch creates a cache of pre-mer

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

2001-10-27 Thread Brian Pane
Brian Pane wrote: > Aaron Bannert wrote: [...] >> I agree that in general we probably don't want to go around replacing >> these things everywhere, but in some cases (like inside a tight loop >> in a filter that gets called many times during a single request) it may >> make sense. But that's w

Problems with Keep-Alive and still not exiting childs

2001-10-27 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi list, this problem is Cygwin 1.x specific, but I'm ask the list for a hint on where I can start figuring out what we have here: On the Cygwin 1.x platform (running both 1.1.8-2 and 1.3.3-2) I have the following effect. While running Apache the load is quite good handled using the standard Max

Linux New Media Award for httpd

2001-10-27 Thread Lars Eilebrecht
Hi guys, I almost forgot to send this email... About 10 days ago the Apache httpd server has won the Linux New Media Award in the category "Best Server Software". We got 54% of all votes. Other nomiees included Samba (23%), OpenSSH (17%), phpGroupware (4%) and OpenLDAP (2%). The award ceremony

[PATCH] performance improvement for userdata

2001-10-27 Thread Brian Pane
[This is a repost of an uncommitted patch from a week or two ago. I've updated the patch to work against the current code base in CVS.] Two small improvements for apr_pool_userdata_set(): * A "setn" variant that doesn't strdup the key (useful when, for example, the key is a compile-time constant

Re: DoS on POSTS

2001-10-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Jon Travis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 1:24 AM > Like I said in my follow up post to my original, you don't even > need to post the data to actually have this occur. I telneted > to the server, and let it sit there for like 47 minutes before > I killed it. I ne

Re: results with 2.0.27-dev on daedalus :-)

2001-10-27 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > > Apropos of nothing. Given a request with no language, yes, > it will serve. But in the grand scheme, .html.html aught be > treated as whatever one sets their DefaultLanguage to, which > would undermine the original workaround. And if there is NO DefaultLanguag

Run time error on Win2k

2001-10-27 Thread Amit Athavale
I took latest code from CVS. I compiled it on Win2k. But when i try to run Apache.exe it gives me runtime error : "The procedure entry point apr_terminate could not be located in dynamic link library libapr.dll" Whats the possible cause ??? -Amit Make a difference, help support the relief

Re: [STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Oct 24 23:45:06 EDT 2001

2001-10-27 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:51:17AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >1.3.22: Tagged Oct 8, 2001 > > > > What's stopping the roll/release here? > > done happened... I just updated STATUS... thanks! I figured I must be wrong; the Apache people couldn'

Re: DoS on POSTS

2001-10-27 Thread Jon Travis
Like I said in my follow up post to my original, you don't even need to post the data to actually have this occur. I telneted to the server, and let it sit there for like 47 minutes before I killed it. I never had it time out. -- Jon On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:51:59AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:

Re: results with 2.0.27-dev on daedalus :-)

2001-10-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Rodent of Unusual Size" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:31 AM > "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > > > > > > User accepts no specified, we serve none [Also wrong, > > > > also MULTIPLE_CHOICES should be the default behavior!!!] > > > > > > Unclear. What about a reques

Re: DoS on POSTS

2001-10-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:51 PM > On Thursday 25 October 2001 08:52 pm, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > It seems that there is a possibility for DoS on Apache servers > > > when doing a POST. On search.apache.org, I can send the following > > > request: > >

Re: malloc.h is deprecated in FreeBSD :-{

2001-10-27 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote: > I think I spotted one the other day when Hiten first brought this up, but > I'd forgotten about it. I'll go fix it. Turns out that the ones that are missing the #ifdef's are all in Win32 or OS2-related files--all the ones for Unix are correct. Should

Re: malloc.h is deprecated in FreeBSD :-{

2001-10-27 Thread Cliff Woolley
On 26 Oct 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Do you see it included anywhere without #ifdef HAVE_MALLOC_H around the > include? I think I spotted one the other day when Hiten first brought this up, but I'd forgotten about it. I'll go fix it. --Cliff --

Re: malloc.h is deprecated in FreeBSD :-{

2001-10-27 Thread Jeff Trawick
Cliff Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > > I think I spotted one the other day when Hiten first brought this up, but > > I'd forgotten about it. I'll go fix it. > > Turns out that the ones that are missing the #ifdef's are all in Win32 or > OS2-

Re: mod_cgid broken in HEAD...

2001-10-27 Thread Jeff Trawick
Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm getting "Premature End of Script Headers" in mod_cgid with > revision 1.51 of apr/threadproc/unix/proc.c. Reverting it to > 1.50 seems to make it okay over here. > > I'm seeing APR_EOF when trying to read from the socket in the > httpd (non-