On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> I have reported such hanginf keepalive childs on the Cygwin 1.x
> platform.
>
> These come up after some days of load and ussually go up to 50-60
> "blocked" keepalive childs. Recently (after 16 days httpd uptime) the
> whole scoreboard "flushed" and the h
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:22:36PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> I've been doing some quick performance runs again, and have noticed (well..
> other people did before me) that the worker MPM tends to concentrate all
> it's work to a few processes leaving
> others doing nothing.
>
> Is this by
I've been doing some quick performance runs again, and have noticed (well.. other
people did before
me) that the worker MPM tends to concentrate all it's work to a few processes leaving
others doing nothing.
Is this by design?
..Ian
On Friday 16 November 2001 06:24 pm, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:13:39PM +0100, httpd user wrote:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I've got some patchs to start the AS/400 (IBM iSeries) port of APR and
> > Apache 2.0. I hope you'll be interested to include it :)
>
> Not to discourage c
On Friday 16 November 2001 06:49 pm, Greg Stein wrote:
> The current logic is basically:
>
> if (method_number != M_GET)
> return do_get();
>
> if (method_number != M_PROPFIND)
> return do_propfind();
>
> if (method_number != M_INVALID)
> return DECLINED;
>
> if
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 03:30:39PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Friday 16 November 2001 11:18 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>...
> > > Option 3. :-) We have APIs to allow you to check the dynamically
> > > registered methods.
> >
> > I'd already thought
Greg Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> > With this newer patch, the behavior w.r.t. pid file cleanup and
> > SIGTERM messages should be consistent between prefork and worker.
> > Neither pid file cleanup nor the SIGTERM message is issued.
>
> Personally, I like the id
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 04:13:39PM +0100, httpd user wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I've got some patchs to start the AS/400 (IBM iSeries) port of APR and Apache 2.0.
> I hope you'll be interested to include it :)
Not to discourage contributions like this (they are greatly appreciated)
but I don't see
Hi to all,
I've got some patchs to start the AS/400 (IBM
iSeries) port of APR and Apache 2.0.
I hope you'll be interested to include it
:)
Regards.
config.sub.diff
Description: Binary data
config.guess.diff
Description: Binary data
apr_hints.m4.diff
Description: Binary data
con
i mentioned a while back that i had hacked jim winstead's "colobus" NNTP
server (designed to run under tcpserver or inetd) into a protocol handler
using modperl-2.0. and that i had it working with mod_ssl. however, to
get it working with ssl required a special case hack that didn't always
work.
On Friday 16 November 2001 02:58 pm, sterling wrote:
Okay guys, I fucked up. I have been doing a lot of stuff recently, and
I didn't put the two together immediately. Ryan Morgan did find this problem
first. The two bugs were in two different contexts, and I didn't put them
together at first.
On Friday 16 November 2001 11:18 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I'm not sure what the right fix is, having no real knowledge of
> > > httpd's internals. The options that come to mind are:
> > >
> > > * Have the server NOT register the REPORT request ty
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> > around the reference count. The lock API requires that we create the
> > lock from a pool, but there isn't a really suitable pool from which
> > to allocate the lock, given that its lifetime isn't necessarily tied
> > to that of a request or connection.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 08:35:47PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
>...
> When I tried to implement a traditional reference-counting solution
> (all apr_mmap_t's duplicated from the same original share a reference
> count, and the mmap'ed segment is destroyed only when the refcount
> reaches zero), I ran
Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:07:33AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > (the subject says it all)
>
> We just need to decide if the worker MPM is to become the primary
> hybrid threaded/process MPM, no?
>
> [Doesn't this discussion belong on dev@httpd?]
My main objections to
I guess since you replied to that message i assumed you had read it -
sterling
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Friday 16 November 2001 07:01 am, sterling wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > On Thursday 15 November 2001 12:16 pm, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > > On Thurs
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> good question me alaso would like to know
Look in the headers of any message on the list, and you will find the
unsubscribe mailing address. Send a blank email to that address, and
you're off.
good question me alaso would like to know
HOw do you unsubscribe from this list?
joe
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:11 PM
To: Brian Pane
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmap_setaside (with apr_mmap_dup)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 10:0
PCRE 3.7 has consistent terms in both files, now matching what was just
in LICENCE before. We should import 3.7 before the next release.
Roy
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:16:49PM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:05:35PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > Are we in violation of section 2? Looks that way to me. License attached for
> > convenience... Easy enough to fix, if indeed it needs fixing.
>
> Weird, why didn'
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:05:35PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Are we in violation of section 2? Looks that way to me. License attached for
> convenience... Easy enough to fix, if indeed it needs fixing.
Weird, why didn't I see that when I looked at it just two weeks ago?
Our README currently
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 06:28:25PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> aaron 01/11/16 10:28:25
>
> Modified:modules/ssl ssl_util.c
> Log:
> Conversion from old apr_lock_t to new apr_thread_mutex_t
> (only converting INTRAPROCESS locks at this time).
>
> I don't see how this u
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> With this newer patch, the behavior w.r.t. pid file cleanup and
> SIGTERM messages should be consistent between prefork and worker.
> Neither pid file cleanup nor the SIGTERM message is issued.
Personally, I like the idea of pid file cleanup when bad stuff happens.
It's
Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not sure what the right fix is, having no real knowledge of
> > httpd's internals. The options that come to mind are:
> >
> > * Have the server NOT register the REPORT request type.
> >
> >But this seems like a bad idea...I assume that code is t
I just put some votes on a) remove threaded and b) make worker the
default in the STATUS file. Sorry, I left out the "renaming all of
the MPMs" thing... One of you folks can do that if you choose.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com
Are we in violation of section 2? Looks that way to me. License attached for
convenience... Easy enough to fix, if indeed it needs fixing.
Bill
PCRE LICENCE
PCRE is a library of functions to support regular expressions whose syntax
and semantics are as close as possible to those of
On Friday 16 November 2001 07:01 am, sterling wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 November 2001 12:16 pm, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > On Thursday 15 November 2001 12:05 pm, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > > > > When was the la
On Thursday 15 November 2001 10:00 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The presence of this set of directives throws a wrench into the works:
> >
> > require valid-user
> >
>
> The code that parses this from the conf file sees "REPORT" as a
> request type, sez, "Hmm...I dunno wha
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 08:43:00AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> The only additional requirement with worker is condition variables.
I believe the overriding constraints are the fork semantics, but yes
condition variables are another requirement. However, the worker MPM
only uses the APR call
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:07:33AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > (the subject says it all)
>
> We just need to decide if the worker MPM is to become the primary
> hybrid threaded/process MPM, no?
I'm definitely in favor of sticking with worker and th
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 08:38:22AM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
> is there a platform that worker doesn't work and threads does?
Doubt it.
The only additional requirement with worker is condition variables.
-- justin
On Fri, 2001-11-16 at 08:31, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 08:11:10AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:07:33AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > > (the subject says it all)
> >
> > We just need to decide if the worker MPM is to become the primary
> > hy
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 08:11:10AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:07:33AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > (the subject says it all)
>
> We just need to decide if the worker MPM is to become the primary
> hybrid threaded/process MPM, no?
+1 for removing threaded MPM.
+1 f
With this newer patch, the behavior w.r.t. pid file cleanup and
SIGTERM messages should be consistent between prefork and worker.
Neither pid file cleanup nor the SIGTERM message is issued.
I expect that other MPMs which call ap_process_child_status (beos,
perchild, threaded) would be modified in
sterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi -
>
> Right now you can compile mod_auth_dbm with AP_AUTH_DBM_USE_APR and it
> will use whatever dbm you've configured apr for. It #defines dbm_open et.
> al. to apr_dbm_open, which is kind of lame. It should probably be
> rewritten to simply just use
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2001 12:16 pm, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 November 2001 12:05 pm, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > > > When was the last time you synch'd? I did some style changes yesterday,
> > >
Hi -
Right now you can compile mod_auth_dbm with AP_AUTH_DBM_USE_APR and it
will use whatever dbm you've configured apr for. It #defines dbm_open et.
al. to apr_dbm_open, which is kind of lame. It should probably be
rewritten to simply just use apr_dbm for everything...
If my understanding is
It is used extensively in the webdav acl and
delta-v drafts to query indirect information
about a url.
Keith
| -Original Message-
| From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:14 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTE
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:14:43PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, David Reid wrote:
> >
> > > OK, so there has been one negative comment about my patch to fix this,
does
> > > anyone else have an opinion?
> >
> > I personally think Roy's idea is a bit cleaner... but yours i
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 10:05:18PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
> Based on Cliff's suggestion, this patch introduces an apr_mmap_dup()
> function that's used to setaside mmap buckets without having to
> memcpy the content.
Cool.
> I gave up trying to do full reference counting semantics for
> duplic
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> And 3. the impact of SetInput|OutputFilter and AddInput|OutputFilter on
> ordering, by virtue of their presense in different ,
> or containers.
+1 ;-)
--
Eli Marmor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTO, Founder
Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies Ltd.
_
42 matches
Mail list logo
