Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/proxy config.m4

2001-12-19 Thread Victor J. Orlikowski
On Wednesday, 19 Dec 2001, at 17:31:01, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Any details about proxy not working on AIX? > > Are there still issues with libtool on AIX? -- justin Not at the moment... The issue is as follows: mod_proxy_{connect,ftp,http} all depend on symbols in mod_proxy. Run-time linki

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Dec 19 23:45:09 EST 2001

2001-12-19 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2001/12/17 22:05:58 $] Release: 2.0.30 : In development 2.0.29 : tagged November 27, 2001 2.0.28 : released November 13, 2001 2.0.27 : rolled November 6, 2001 2.0.26 : tag

[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Dec 19 23:45:05 EST 2001

2001-12-19 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2001/12/18 15:31:57 $] Release: 1.3.22: Tagged Oct 8, 2001. Announced Oct 12, 2001. 1.3.21: Not released. (Pulled for htdocs/manual config mismatch. t/r Oct 5, 2001) 1.3.

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/proxy config.m4

2001-12-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:57:46PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > orlikowski01/12/17 15:57:46 > > Modified:modules/proxy config.m4 > Log: > No point in linking the proxy objects with the submodules. > However, proxy is not working on AIX since the rtl changes. Any details abou

Re: ServerLimit, MaxClients

2001-12-19 Thread Daniel Lopez
Ok, now it makes sense :) I suggest your explanation gets added to the docs and linked as a "See also" for all the directives involved. Cheers Daniel --- Sure, but... Here is how I would have them configured with prefork: MaxClients: big enough to handle normal, expected load S

Re: ServerLimit, MaxClients

2001-12-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
Daniel Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can be MaxClients and ThreadLimit eliminated? Sure, but... Here is how I would have them configured with prefork: MaxClients: big enough to handle normal, expected load ServerLimit: as large as is reasonable for the machine without

ServerLimit, MaxClients

2001-12-19 Thread Daniel Lopez
I am trying to make sense of the following directives: MaxClients, ServerLimit, ThreadLimit, ThreadsPerChild As I understand: MaxClients <= ServerLimit in prefork ThreadsPerChild <= ThreadLimit MaxClients <= Serverlimit * ThreadLimit in worker Can be MaxClients and ThreadLimit eliminated?

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2Filter crashes on Windows

2001-12-19 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > ap_save_brigade(ap_filter_t * 0x00564f00, apr_bucket_brigade * * > 0x10d95984, apr_bucket_brigade * * 0x10a6bdf8, apr_pool_t * 0x10cd4070) > line 416 + 71 bytes > php_output_filter(ap_filter_t * 0x00564f00, apr_bucket_brigade * > 0x00565068) line 350 + 32 bytes > ap_pas

Re: server not responding properly to bad packets

2001-12-19 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:38:55AM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote: > (attached a PCAP) > server is running apache 2.0.29 (+mod-include patch + apr-table > patch+multidbm stuff) > > we're seeing the following request come in on our test servers, > and it is causing us to segfault's every once and a whi

server not responding properly to bad packets

2001-12-19 Thread Ian Holsman
(attached a PCAP) server is running apache 2.0.29 (+mod-include patch + apr-table patch+multidbm stuff) we're seeing the following request come in on our test servers, and it is causing us to segfault's every once and a while in the logger. I was just wondering if anyone knew about this and if i

Re: [PATCH] HardServerLimit directive for prefork MPM

2001-12-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another thing that we need to consider here are settings that will reak > havok, like AllocatedServers < MaxServers. I'd like to do some more > runtime checking of these config params, but I'm not sure if post_config > is the right place to do it if we

Re: [PATCH] HardServerLimit directive for prefork MPM

2001-12-19 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:17:42AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > What I just committed for prefork and worker (not in the cvs archive > yet for some reason!) was just plain ServerLimit/ThreadLimit. I > wanted to get the code committed and then start working on the doc. > I'll be most willing to do

Re: StartServers > MaxSpareServers (or MaxSpareThreads)

2001-12-19 Thread Jacek Prucia
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: here's another one: MaxSpareServers < MinSpareServers (Apache 1.3.22, no warning) > Should we issue a warning if this happens and push StartServers back > down to the MaxSpareServers (or a function of MaxSpareThreads) limit? At least warning. I was think

Re: [PATCH] HardServerLimit directive for prefork MPM

2001-12-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
What I just committed for prefork and worker (not in the cvs archive yet for some reason!) was just plain ServerLimit/ThreadLimit. I wanted to get the code committed and then start working on the doc. I'll be most willing to do the appropriate find/replace if you folks can work out a consensus fo

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker mpm_default.h worker.c

2001-12-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greg Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Hmmm... (2nd thoughts :) ) > > > > > > mpm_default.h exists so people can edit default settings in one nice > > > place... it wasn't nice for me to move these things out of > > > mpm_defaults.h... I'll mo