My name is Johan van den Berg. I am a programmer that started off on the wrong foot
(BASIC) when I was just 13 years old. I started programming in Pascal when I was 15,
as this is the language taught at our schools. After becoming fluent in OP, I went
for a course on C/C++ & DELPHI. Beca
> aaron 02/01/22 22:51:18
>
> Modified:server scoreboard.c
> Log:
> Although this patch is technically correct, I'm not happy with
> the way it gets things done. OTOH, it is a simple enough change
> to get things working correctly for now. I will come up with
> the right w
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:39:27PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
> > > The one-byte reads are for the CGI's response header. The problem is that
> > > mod_cgi hands off the pipe (non-buffered) to ap_scan_script_header_err(),
> > > which does single-byte reads until it finds the end of the header.
> [assuming you meant to post this to dev@httpd instead]
>
Yep.
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:19:57AM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > >From STATUS
> >
> >* mod_cgid leaks pipe descriptors, apparently for every request.
> > I would guess that this is due to recent apr_file_dup[2]
> >
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:39:27PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
> > The one-byte reads are for the CGI's response header. The problem is that
> > mod_cgi hands off the pipe (non-buffered) to ap_scan_script_header_err(),
> > which does single-byte reads until it finds the end of the header. After
>
[assuming you meant to post this to dev@httpd instead]
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:19:57AM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> >From STATUS
>
>* mod_cgid leaks pipe descriptors, apparently for every request.
> I would guess that this is due to recent apr_file_dup[2]
> changes.
>
> Is
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 09:09:02PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
...
> > If you are getting "Not implemented on this platform" errors, then
> > something funny is going on -- that only happens in the scoreboard if
> > you don't have any anonymous shmem
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:39:27PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
> The one-byte reads are for the CGI's response header. The problem is that
> mod_cgi hands off the pipe (non-buffered) to ap_scan_script_header_err(),
> which does single-byte reads until it finds the end of the header. After
> that, m
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/01/21 19:34:31 $]
Release:
1.3.23: Tagged Jan 21, 2002.
1.3.22: Tagged Oct 8, 2001. Announced Oct 12, 2001.
1.3.21: Not released.
(Pulled for htdocs/manual config mis
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/01/23 19:13:15 $]
Release:
2.0.31 : In development
2.0.30 : tagged January 8, 2002.
2.0.29 : tagged November 27, 2001. not rolled.
2.0.28 : released November 13, 2001
From: "Chuck Murcko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:16 PM
> On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 04:30 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Proxy Folk,
> >
> > who last hacked this bit? I suspect we have to cover the same bug as
> > was fixed in buff.c. recv/send can pr
On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 04:30 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Proxy Folk,
>
> who last hacked this bit? I suspect we have to cover the same bug as
> was fixed in buff.c. recv/send can produce some very cryptic results,
> this is buff.c's workaround (recv, there is a similar patch f
Brad,
patches for Apache 1.3 mod_auth_dbm and sdbm lib are all checked in;
only the *.def and an updated project prevents from building it...
I would have posted an updated project which builds sdbm lib, but you know of the path
problems...
Guenter.
> Guenter,
> I checked in MOD_AUTH_DBM
Guenter,
I checked in MOD_AUTH_DBM.def for Apache 2.0 but we have never
built Auth_DBM for 1.3 so nothing has ever been checked in to support
it.
Brad
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, January 23, 2002 5:00:31 PM >>>
builds and runs on NetWare and Win32.
Brad, did you forget to check in Apa
BTW, this stream of messages is one of the reasons that we moved to the
new tagging scheme. People should feel free to tag when they believe that
the code is stable. If you announce your intent to tag on the list, you
are encouraging people to commit code at the last minute, just to get it
in t
builds and runs on NetWare and Win32.
Brad, did you forget to check in ApacheModuleAuthDBM.def ??
Guenter.
> ... are available for testing at dev.apache.org/dist
> --
> ==
> =
>Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache 1.3.23 checks out OK on TPF
Carolyn Weiss
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo
