Just a note to let everyone know that the first pass of conversion of the
module docs to xml is complete. This was accomplished with the help of Rich
Bowen, Brad Miller, and Patrik Grip-Jansson.
There is still lots of fine tuning to be done, but I believe what we have
now is much more maintainab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> provide missing MAX() macro so that proxy can compile again
Thanks - found it while I was on the plane earlier this morning, but
could not get anywhere near a net connection till now.
Regards,
Graham
--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 03:04:49PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I must be misunderstanding the debate. Obviously for those that
> use config.layout layouts, then they will require that their httpd.conf
> file match with how things were build. Is the question then should
> configure build an appro
At 10:07 AM -0800 3/9/02, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:34:58AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Putting absolute paths in the config file is a Bad Idea. Using
>> relatives, the entire Apache install location can be self-contained
>> and easily moved by changing one line.
>
>H
Brian Pane wrote:
>
> Thus I view the
> finalization of the APIs and design changes (based on what
> we've communicated in STATUS) as the most important next step,
> followed by getting the 2.0 GA released.
>
I agree. Modules won't be ported en mass to 2.0 until module writers
and maintainers h
> From: Thom May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 March 2002 19:45
> * Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:12:39PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>>> Let me clarify: By putting absolute paths into the config
>>> files, we are locking the installation
* Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:12:39PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > Let me clarify: By putting absolute paths into the config
> > files, we are locking the installation into a single location.
> > By using ServerRoot-relative locations, as we a
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:34:58AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Putting absolute paths in the config file is a Bad Idea. Using
> relatives, the entire Apache install location can be self-contained
> and easily moved by changing one line.
How would you deal with:
./configure --prefix=/opt/apache
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:47:13PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>>
>>>credit where it is deserved. I do *not* think we owe the user
>>>community a project plan and schedule of deliverables.
>>>
>>I think we owe it to the other developers
>
> server/main.c:578
> /* This is a hack until we finish the code so that it only
reads
> * the config file once and just operates on the tree already
in
> * memory. rbb
> */
>
> What's the status on this?
Awaiting somebody to pick it up.
Ryan
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:47:13PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > credit where it is deserved. I do *not* think we owe the user
> > community a project plan and schedule of deliverables.
>
> I think we owe it to the other developers to have a project
> pla
Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > For those that may not understand the exact question, it is
> > this (restated):
> >
> > "Should we modify httpd-std.conf to stop referring to logs/,
> > conf/ and substitute the $localstatedir and $sysconfdir values?"
> >
> > I'll let the group decide. -- justin
>
Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> When I build Apache like so:
>
> ./configure --prefix=/opt/local/apache2 --enable-proxy --enable-cache
>
> It fails like so:
>
> prefork.c: In function `prefork_pre_config':
> prefork.c:1221: `APR_PROC_DETACH_FOREGROUND' undeclared (fi
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 09 March 2002 15:04
>
> > trawick 02/03/09 06:04:11
> >
> > Modified:modules/proxy mod_proxy.c
> > Log:
> > provide missing MAX() macro so that proxy can compile again
>
server/main.c:578
/* This is a hack until we finish the code so that it only reads
* the config file once and just operates on the tree already in
* memory. rbb
*/
What's the status on this?
Sander
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 March 2002 15:04
> trawick 02/03/09 06:04:11
>
> Modified:modules/proxy mod_proxy.c
> Log:
> provide missing MAX() macro so that proxy can compile again
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.74 +3 -0 httpd
Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > implement a common function for getting a socket and trying to connect
> > to the target host; use that common function for proxy HTTP and proxy
> > CONNECT
> >
> > In that new function, fix this problem:
> >
>
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Sander Striker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Should we bump the copyright year on all the files?
> > Anyone have a script handy?
>
> find . -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|2000-2001|2000-2002|' {} \;
>
Would be nicer to have a more 'correct' stript which would be
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 March 2002 08:57
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 02:54:01AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 12:20:23PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > > Sander Striker wrote:
> > > >Hi,
> > > >
> > > >Should we bump the copyright year o
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Igor Sysoev wrote:
>
> > > > *) make simple fault-tolerance with dns-balanced backends.
> > >
> > > mod_proxy does this already.
> >
> > No. mod_proxy tries it but code is broken. If connection failed it try
> > to connect with the same socket. It sho
20 matches
Mail list logo
