it is a nice feature when it works, so i've re-enabled for linux only.
for the other platforms in the current state, its better to wait 60
seconds if the server fails to start than to throw and error and die when
it has successfully started.
Haven't seen the patch yet, but for some systems it's the waitpid() call
that seems weird.
Doug MacEachern wrote:
it is a nice feature when it works, so i've re-enabled for linux only.
for the other platforms in the current state, its better to wait 60
seconds if the server fails to start
Also Darwin...
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dougm 02/04/06 18:14:40
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestServer.pm
Log:
this $SIG{CHLD} / $? status checking stuff does not work well on
solaris or hpux. more often than not get:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:38:15AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Haven't seen the patch yet, but for some systems it's the waitpid() call
that seems weird.
Could it have something to do with how we're creating a new process group
after forking and killing the parent? I don't remember this
Maybe... but it works fine with Linux, so it would be then how
each OS handles the whole process group stuff.
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:38:15AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Haven't seen the patch yet, but for some systems it's the waitpid() call
that seems weird.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Maybe... but it works fine with Linux, so it would be then how
each OS handles the whole process group stuff.
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:38:15AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Haven't seen the patch yet, but for some systems it's the waitpid() call
that seems
I like using the Apache2 default myself. I hate files placed willy-nilly
all over the place :)
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aaron 02/04/06 13:44:44
Modified:.config.layout
Log:
Add libdir entries to config.layout.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
+1 here too, but please also decorate with API_EXPORT() fooness and
add to the appropriate entries to ApacheCore.def/ApacheCoreNW.def files.
I don't know the windows build stuff at all - are the above two files
the only ones needing changing?
Regards,
Graham
--
I'll get the sign-up list into STATUS right now.
Ryan
--
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
San Francisco, CA
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| 7195|Opn|Blk|2002-03-18|mod_proxy removes Set-cookie headers |
This bug is fixed - how does one update bugzilla? Is there an idiots
guide anywhere?
Regards,
Graham
--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]There's a
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:58:31PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+Binaries needed:
+
+ Mandrake 8.1: rbb volunteers
+ FreeBSD 4.1: rbb volunteers
+ OS X 10.1.3: jimjag volunteers
+ Solaris 8.x: jimjag volunteers
+ RedHat 7.2:jimjag volunteers
Hmmm...we
Dale Ghent wrote:
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote:
| Well, That seems to be the view if one reads the following threads at
| the postgres mailing list and Sun's developer connection
|
| http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-04/msg00103.php
|
Doug MacEachern wrote:
i haven't been able to reproduce this, but the patch below (also in
cvs) may fix. seeing that ssl_io_hook_read sets rc = 0 if SSL_read
returns -1 and SSL_get_error is SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ. ssl_io_input_read
was *always* returning APR_SUCCESS if it got 0 bytes. now
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 13:15, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Hmmm...we should specify the architecture too. Also, lets not differenciate
each and every linux distro, but just major linux version. I've got
a 2.2.19-based (redhat) system that I can build on, and a Solaris 8
Intel machine too.
Don't
coupla dumb questions:
- how do i get a login for the bugdb?
- just fixed bug #7802, do i close it or mark as fixed and somebody else
verifies and closes?
Greg Stein wrote:
It's my pleasure to announce that the Apache Software Foundation's Apache
HTTP Server, version 2.0.35, has now been released for General Availability.
Gees guys..
you leave for a couple of days to have a baby and all hell
breaks loose
Congrats to all!
--Ian
The Apache
Congrat's on the baby. :-)
Ryan
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
It's my pleasure to announce that the Apache Software Foundation's Apache
HTTP Server, version 2.0.35, has now been released for General Availability.
Gees guys..
you leave for a couple of days
I do not see HP-UX in the list. So, has anyone signed up for releasing
Apache binaries on HP-UX already? If not, I would like to sign up for
building apache on HP-UX 11.00 (PA-RISC) and HP-UX 11i version 1.5
(IA64/IPF).
Thanks,
Mohan
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Bannert
So does it mean that you (as in apache.org) have access to a 11i version 1.5
(IA64) box? If so, thats good news. Otherwise, I could arrange an access
to an IPF box for one of the apache.org folks. Please do let me know!
Thanks,
Mohan
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Woolley
21 matches
Mail list logo
