Dear all,
i have problem to compile apache-2.0.35
i do with :
./configure --build=i386-redhat-linux
--with-program-name=httpd2
--with-port=8092
--with-mpm=worker --prefix=/etc/httpd2 --exec-prefix=/usr
--bindir=/usr/sbin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --libexecdir=/usr/lib/apache2
--mandir=/usr/share/ma
Does anyone know anything about this?
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7966
I think this is the same as the showstopper entry in STATUS:
* Incorrect Content-Range headers or invalid 416 HTTP responses
if a filter such as INCLUDES changes the content length. It may
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Maybe editing apr_atomic.h to this (line 254):
>
>#define apr_atomic_read(p) (*p)
>
> Can you check?
Still broke :(
Regards,
Graham
--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"There's a moon
Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> In file included from apr_atomic.c:57:
> ../../include/apr_atomic.h:260: parse error before `apr_atomic_init'
> ../../include/apr_atomic.h:260: parse error before `*'
> ../../include/apr_atomic.h:260: warning: data definition has no type or
> storage class
> make[4]: ***
Hi all,
v2.0 breaks on Linux like so:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/minfrin/src/apache/sandbox/proxy/httpd-2.0/srclib/apr/atomic/unix'
/bin/sh
/home/minfrin/src/apache/sandbox/proxy/httpd-2.0/srclib/apr/libtool
--silent --mode=compile gcc -g -O2 -pthread -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLINUX=2
-D_REENT
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> I expect a warning message that "No proxy agents are loaded" is probably
> more useful, ultimately, than attempting to co-load the modules.
The warning message was there - but only appeared if LogLevel was set to
"debug". I changed the message to something more in
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 02:31:29PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> gregames02/04/24 07:31:28
>
> Modified:server core.c
> Log:
> default_handler: short circuit the method checks. Move the code to deal
> with unusual methods to the end of function to reduce i-cache clutter.
C
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> Hmm..I don't see the VERSION symbol in the 2.0 version, and it looks
> like the comments in the header stop at Version 1.3e. I could start
> up at 2.0a, but would it be of much use to mention what has happened in
> the mean time? Also, I think we depen
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:13:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Aaron,
>
> Could you also ++i the version number ? I.e. in the past we changed the
> VERSION string each time we made a change which made results of that
> version of AB incomparable with previous ones. See comments in the he
comments below...
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 05:09:59PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> aaron 02/04/24 10:09:59
>
> Modified:support ab.c
> Log:
> Major improvement in concurrent processing for AB:
> - Enable non-blocking connects.
> - Prevent quasi-blocking mode apr_recv (wh
"Igor Leturia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First of all, I must apologize as I am not exactly an Apache
> developper, though I would like to help in some way. I am writing to
> this list just to point out an error in Apache 2.0.35. The problem is
> that the Windows distribution of Apache 2.0.
Aaron,
Could you also ++i the version number ? I.e. in the past we changed the
VERSION string each time we made a change which made results of that
version of AB incomparable with previous ones. See comments in the header
of apache-1.3/src/support/ab.c.
Given that your change does that - might
Hi!
First of all, I must apologize as I am not exactly an Apache
developper, though I would like to help in some way. I am writing to
this list just to point out an error in Apache 2.0.35. The problem is
that the Windows distribution of Apache 2.0.35 doesn't include the
mod_ext_filter.so file
At 02:23 PM 4/24/2002, Guilherme Dávalos wrote:
hi
folks,
I installed an apache http server on my machine [...]
Anybody knows what's happening?
Yup. You are emailing a developer's list, where this sort of
question
is out of place [in spite of repeating that config question are not
appropriate
At 08:55 AM 4/24/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> >
> > > We have the exact same issue with mod_cache
> > > (mod_mem_cache/mod_disk_cache). What do you think about hiding the load
> > > of the protocol modules behind a config directive?
> >
> > I don't h
Guilherme Dávalos wrote:
>
> hi folks,
>
> I installed an apache http server on my machine that is the web server
> for the my office's net, and only my machine (localhost or 127.0.0.1)
> gets access to the web server.
> I tried to configure the httpd.conf at the nameserver putting my ip
> 10.0.
This is a hack I came up with yesterday to make sure that I wasn't
starving off any of my worker threads. It's nothing I intend to be
committed, but hopefully someone else will find it useful.
-aaron
Index: server/mpm/worker/worker.c
=
hi folks,
I installed an apache http server on my
machine that is the web server for the my office's net, and only my machine
(localhost or 127.0.0.1) gets access to the web server.
I tried to configure the httpd.conf at the
nameserver putting my ip 10.0.75.1 and setting the hostnamelooku
Acked. Anyone want to mentor him?
- Forwarded message from jmusial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: jmusial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows XP Professional
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:18:44 -0400
Importance: Normal
I have compiled all the binaries on the Windows XP
hi folks,
I installed an apache http server on my
machine that is the web server for the my office's net, and only my machine
(localhost or 127.0.0.1) gets access to the web server.
I tried to configure the httpd.conf at the
nameserver putting my ip 10.0.75.1 and setting the hostnamelookup
"Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does this change effectively negate the -c option?
Maybe I didn't read the patch properly, but my understanding was that
the changes only affect how a given connection is handled and do not
affect how many connections ab tries to handle concurrently.
Please lets not go overboard with these types of optimizations. This could get out of
control quickly. Having code that is easy to read, understand and maintain is -much-
more
important than saving a a few extra cycles.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PR
Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> Does this change effectively negate the -c option?
It should actually make -c more accurate for values > 1.
As I understand it, some of the socket calls (such as connect) in ab were
blocking. Since ab is not multi-threaded or multi-process, that single threads
all con
+1 - works for me gov !
Dw.
--
Dirk-Willem van Gulik
+1
At 5:04 PM -0700 4/23/02, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>This patch corrects some problems in the ability of AB to handle
>concurrent processing by:
>
> - enabling nonblocking connect()s.
> - preventing APR from performing blocking reads, allowing AB to
> multiplex over its own set of descriptors.
>
Sander Striker wrote:
>
> If your commit solved the prob, the worker restart issue is
> the remaining holdup for 2.0.36. I'll tag by the end of the day.
>
Crossing fingers...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTEC
Does this change effectively negate the -c option?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:04 PM
Subject: [PATCH] improve request multiplexing in AB
> This patch corrects some problems in the ability o
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> > We have the exact same issue with mod_cache
> > (mod_mem_cache/mod_disk_cache). What do you think about hiding the load
> > of the protocol modules behind a config directive?
>
> I don't have a conceptual problem with that, though it would mean
>
ok thanks
Nick
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: kill signals ...
> "Nick De Decker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > What signal does apache send to the scripts/prog
"Nick De Decker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> What signal does apache send to the scripts/programs that i defined in a
> piped customlog ? ( Customlog |/usr/bin/myscript %B )
> What signals does it send when i do a kill -HUP apache-pid , and for USR1,
> and what when apache gets kill
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch corrects some problems in the ability of AB to handle
> concurrent processing by:
>
> - enabling nonblocking connect()s.
> - preventing APR from performing blocking reads, allowing AB to
>multiplex over its own set of descriptors.
+1
* Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> * Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 07:49:43PM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > > "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch will fix a couple of problems I found when building modules using
> >
Cliff Woolley wrote:
> We should consider having mod_proxy issue a warning at startup if it's
> loaded as a DSO but none of the protocol handlers (mod_proxy_*.so) are
> loaded.
It would be easier if a catch-all error message was added should the
control select-case choose "none of the above". I
Cliff Woolley wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
>>This patch corrects some problems in the ability of AB to handle
>>concurrent processing by:
>> - enabling nonblocking connect()s.
>> - preventing APR from performing blocking reads, allowing AB to
>> multiplex over its own s
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 April 2002 19:57
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >
> > The reason I suggested a hold to Sander on account of the atomics
> > is that we have a bunch of PRs relating to building atomics on
> > Solaris that haven't been (yet) resolved.
> >
35 matches
Mail list logo
