Hello!
The debian distributed Apache package, when SSL is activated segfaults
randomly. This has been only noticed when using Explorer, that shows a
"Connection closed" error. A simple reload shows the page properly.
I know this is very generic. There is any posibility to force apache to drop
co
On Sun, 19 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I'm not sure. It seems that inflating would be a proxy input side
> filter, much like dechunking. However, if no module needs to process the
> body, it would be a horrible waste to inflate+deflate the content.
Yeah...
> Why can't we insist on
The install- targets have "{} \;" left in the rm -rf invocation which
removes CVS directories, presumably a leftover from being a find -exec.
--- Makefile.in 13 May 2002 07:45:15 - 1.112
+++ Makefile.in 20 May 2002 12:46:01 -
@@ -109,25 +109,25 @@
@test -d $(htdocs-srcdir) &&
Hi there,
This is a repost of an earlier mail. The patch has been edited to
rename the directive (from "expose" to "reveal") and to rename the
#define'd macros to avoid namespace invasion.
This patch introduces a config directive which changes the behaviour of
MultiViews. It potentially expose
Is this topic interesting for somebody except me?
In my opinion, it's very useful thing, and it's easy to realize...
Anyway, there are another two fields for "full" format:
%{X-Forwarded-For}i: list of proxy clients ip-addresses (separated by
',', value 'unknown' may be used in some cases)
(than
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > While testing this on daedalus, I noticed yet another sendfile_it_all assert
> > dump in /tmp, dated May 10. I think I'll put a new httpd build into production
> > this weekend with this patch on top of 2.0.36.
>
> Why don't we roll o
At 08:53 AM 5/20/2002, you wrote:
>Is this topic interesting for somebody except me?
Not here... here's why.,,
>In my opinion, it's very useful thing, and it's easy to realize...
When it comes to a "Complete" reference, stop and look at the number
of HTTP headers that might be interesting. Loo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>When it comes to a "Complete" reference, stop and look at the number
>of HTTP headers that might be interesting. Look at the breadth of SSL
>tokens available from mod_ssl. It is reasonably incomprehensible to t
Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On 20 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>ianh02/05/19 17:07:33
>>
>> Modified:modules/filters mod_deflate.c
>> Log:
>> content with "Content-Encoding" header, content is encoded.
>> But mod_deflate does not check it. It cause to encode content twice.
>
Greg Ames wrote:
> [Mon May 20 07:14:14 2002] [crit] (22)Invalid argument: mod_rewrite: Could not
> set permissions on rewrite_log_lock; check User and Group directives
> Configuration Failed
from apr.h:
#define APR_USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZE 1
#define APR_USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE 0
(g
On 17 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Added EnableMMAP (commented out) to the standard config
I lost your response to my question, but I think I remember the gist of
it. To respond:
1. It seems pretty nasty that we need to people to adjust their
configuration based on the underlying fil
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 12:32:20PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>...
> Ok, segfault is gone. So is some validation that ServerRoot occured in a
> global
> context. Actually, that means that LoadModule and others are not tested to be
> in the global context either.
(see further below)
>
Here is a patch for Apache 1.3 which when used with OpenBSD 3.1 and up
allows modules to work on our ELF-based architectures.
BTW, I am not subscribed to this list so please reply directly to me.
--- Configure.orig Sat May 11 23:39:59 2002
+++ Configure Mon May 20 17:19:41 2002
@@ -1130,6
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:40:03AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > On 20 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >>ianh02/05/19 17:07:33
> >>
> >> Modified:modules/filters mod_deflate.c
> >> Log:
> >> content with "Content-Encoding" header, content is enco
The following patch reverts to the previous and documented
bevahiour (exhibited by 1.3). Currently
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 12:32:20PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > On Win32, we load-unload-reload the parent, then load-unload-reload
> > the child config. Losing both redundant unload-load sequences will
> > be a huge win at startup.
>
> Yup. I
how does one disable linking httpd against libexpat in 2.0?
and on win32?
i thought the nightmare was over where the expat linked with httpd cause
segfaults with perl expat extensions. looks like i was wrong.
At 07:31 PM 5/20/2002, Scott Hess wrote:
>On Mon, 20 May 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 12:32:20PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > > On Win32, we load-unload-reload the parent, then load-unload-reload
> > > the child config. Losing both redundant unload-load sequences
At 08:00 PM 5/20/2002, you wrote:
>how does one disable linking httpd against libexpat in 2.0?
>and on win32?
>
>i thought the nightmare was over where the expat linked with httpd cause
>segfaults with perl expat extensions. looks like i was wrong.
Context?
On Mon, 20 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Context?
httpd links in expat, perl extension links against a different version of
expat. both have the same symbol names, and they are not binary
compatible. perl extension resolves symbols to the httpd version.
kaboom. its been an issu
At 09:43 PM 5/20/2002, you wrote:
>On Mon, 20 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Context?
>
>httpd links in expat, perl extension links against a different version of
>expat. both have the same symbol names, and they are not binary
>compatible. perl extension resolves symbols to the htt
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 09:54:16PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 09:43 PM 5/20/2002, you wrote:
> >On Mon, 20 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >
> > > Context?
> >
> >httpd links in expat, perl extension links against a different version of
> >expat. both have the same symbol nam
22 matches
Mail list logo
