On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:43:54PM +0100, Dev Zero G Ltd wrote:
How can I make make compile/configure/make apache 2 with the
--enable-so option? I can not run ./configure since I already have a
Makefile.
If you are using the FreeBSD port then it does --enable-so by default.
Tony.
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick
Sent: 23 July 2002 19:30
[...]
I'm curious about how other people feel about this, so I started a
vote in STATUS.
* httpd-std.conf and friends
a) httpd-std.conf should be tailored by install (from src or
Joshua Slive wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
I personally find that a bit baroque. :-) Also, it's tied
specifically to mod_log_config. However, you've given me
an idea, so here's a counterproposal:
LogStatus envname[=val] statusre ...
(I think the
* Jeff Trawick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* James Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
no! no! leave apachectl to behave as it always has done. could someone
consider vetoing this argument based on backwards compatibility?
-- James
Agreed - why
I would like to roll out some software to users based on apache2 under windows 98 (and
other windows
+platforms).
When visiting http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/platform/windows.html I see a severe
sounding message
+stating that support for windows 98 is incomplete.
What determines if the
Secondly consider that you have installed 2.0.35 and are upgrading to 2.0.40.
If ${sysconfdir}/[examples/]httpd-std.conf would be overwritten, you would
have
no chance to compare the old httpd-std.conf with the new httpd-std.conf
anymore.
I consider that diff more usefull than the diff between
There are several places in HTTPD where we use atol to parse ranges from HTTP
headers. Problem (at least on Darwin) is that a long is smaller than size_t, and
we're unable to handle large files in the 2-4GB range.
atol is the same as calling strtol with NULL and 10 as the last to args,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heckel) writes:
cvs login: failed to open c:/.cvspass for reading: No such file or
directory
Hi,
I solved this problem:-)
I created an empty file .cvspass on c:\ and now I could download all
apr-iconv files.
cool... I hit that cvs bug before too :)
--
Sander Striker wrote:
Exactly, why should users that keep their config dir clean have to pay when
some users don't want to be troubled with getting httpd-std.conf from elsewhere
and need it installed at their fingertips?
Getting the defaults from elsewhere doesn't bother me if the dir has a
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 10:45:40AM -0400, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
1- Is adding apr_strtoll kosher?
+1.
2- Should I also add apr_strtoll for completeness?
+1. -- justin
I wait for it..
/ Jonas
Hi Jonas,
i'm actually workin on hacking a module for this. (ie, like mod_vhost_alias,
but uses a db)
give me maybe a few weeks and i'll publish..
-- james
Hi
My http.conf file grows every day and its getting big...
It's getting hard to find
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone tell me what I need to provide to get these 3 bugs looked at:
8712
need to modify apxs to add LoadModule/AddModule outside of IfXXX
I thought somebody commented on this general problem recently. My
guess is that there won't be a lot of
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 11:30, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone tell me what I need to provide to get these 3 bugs looked at:
8712
need to modify apxs to add LoadModule/AddModule outside of IfXXX
I thought somebody commented on this general
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
10156
I will plan to commit your patch in the next 24 hours. e-mail me
directly if this doesn't happen.
10235
What is the exact failure with --enable-mods-shared=all? Are the
modules built? Do they load?
I thought I included full
David Reid wrote:
Who's we?
Oh, was this more IRC related conversations?
IRC is cool for some things, but it can inadvertently
conceal technical discussions which belong on the
mailing lists and in the archives thereof -- for the
benefit of both posterity and those who weren't on the
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 July 2002 20:58
David Reid wrote:
Who's we?
Oh, was this more IRC related conversations?
IRC is cool for some things, but it can inadvertently
conceal technical discussions which belong on the
mailing lists
Ryan Bloom wrote:
Why is that a good thing?
Because it's consistent with how it works on ten million
existing servers? :-)
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
Millennium hand and shrimp!
Ryan Bloom wrote:
That is the difference between developers and users. I want the -std
files on my DEVELOPER machines, and I have tricks to get them. I don't
want them anywhere near my PRODUCTION machines, because they get in the
way.
You are hardly a typical user. You shouldn't think
If I'm reading the Makefile correctly, current HEAD no longer updates the
manual/ directory if it exists, unlike 1.3. What good is a downlevel manual?
Greg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wsanchez2002/07/24 13:47:29
Modified:.CHANGES
modules/dav/main mod_dav.c
modules/experimental mod_cache.c
modules/http http_protocol.c
modules/mappers mod_negotiation.c
Log:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:43:03PM +0200, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Yes. The unix philosophy.
You are absolutely right: it IS inconsistent, and should be fixed.
But rather than changing all exit codes to 1, I would prefer to see
all these exit codes being changed to EX_OK:
#define EX_OK
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 04:58:55PM -0400, Greg Ames wrote:
If I'm reading the Makefile correctly, current HEAD no longer updates the
manual/ directory if it exists, unlike 1.3. What good is a downlevel manual?
Yeah, that looks bogus. I'd move the copying of the manual to
install-man and copy
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 04:58:55PM -0400, Greg Ames wrote:
If I'm reading the Makefile correctly, current HEAD no longer
updates the
manual/ directory if it exists, unlike 1.3. What good is a
downlevel manual?
Yeah, that looks bogus. I'd move the copying of the manual to
install-man
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 11:11:48PM +0100, James Cox wrote:
kick me if i got this wrong, but manual was always copied into
INSTDIR/html/manual right?
Nah, we switched it to go to $(prefix)/manual by default. It's
not in the htdocs dir now. -- justin
I decided that maybe I would take a different tac that is less
intrusive on other platforms since this is a NetWare problem. If you
look at os/netware/os.h you will see that we had already redefined
exit() to call our pressanykey() function whenever the exit code is
something other than 0.
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/06/27 20:57:21 $]
Release:
1.3.27-dev: In development
1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002.
1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not released.
1.3.24: Tagged Mar 21, 2002. Announced Mar 22,
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/07/24 16:55:45 $]
Release:
2.0.40 : in development.
2.0.39 : rolled June 17, 2002.
2.0.38 : rolled June 16, 2002. not released.
2.0.37 : rolled June 11, 2002. not
27 matches
Mail list logo
