At 07:44 PM 10/25/2002, you wrote:
>[ Simply trying again; or according to Jeff: nag, nag, nag ;-) ]
>
>If you use the "body" feature in type map files, the MIME-headers
>currently are set dependant on what (mostly) type_checker says about the
>type map file.
>
>The attached patch sets the MIME-typ
At 07:04 PM 10/25/2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>"Chandragupt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have developed a BioInformatics Web based Application using
>> CGIC , Linux and Apache as the webserver. We are using MySQL
>> database for data handling.
>> We have run into a problem wherein
[ Simply trying again; or according to Jeff: nag, nag, nag ;-) ]
If you use the "body" feature in type map files, the MIME-headers
currently are set dependant on what (mostly) type_checker says about the
type map file.
The attached patch sets the MIME-type, charset, content-language and
content-e
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 16:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Note: This works by adding a flush bucket to each response when
> mod_logio is used; the side-effect is that pipelined responses
> get broken up into separate network writes per request (but there's
> no impact on pipelining when mod_
"Chandragupt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> We have developed a BioInformatics Web based Application using
> CGIC , Linux and Apache as the webserver. We are using MySQL
> database for data handling.
> We have run into a problem wherein if the browser which has sent
> the request to Apach
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Carla Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd like to hear from the actual developers on this! I read back several
> > months in the list archives, to get some background.
>
> Technically, the API changes have been pretty minor. A module that
>
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 15:31, Brian Pane wrote:
> The only test case in which mod_logio didn't report as small a
> byte count as expected was when I used telnet as the client and
> stopped it (with ctrl-C) while the server was still sending the
> response. A syscall trace on the server showed that
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 17:01, Brian Pane wrote:
> Tested and committed. Thanks!
Thanks.
Bojan
"MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh !!.. That is correct. The SSL_LIBRARY_VERSION is only defined by the
> ssl_util_ssl.h.
> (sorry)
"make clean && make" after changing a header file and before sharing
with the world does wonders :)
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMA
Oh !!.. That is correct. The SSL_LIBRARY_VERSION is only defined by the
ssl_util_ssl.h.
(sorry)
-Madhu
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:trawick@;attglobal.net]
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]Question - regarding mods
"MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -#define modssl_PEM_read_bio_X509 PEM_read_bio_X509
> +#if (SSL_LIBRARY_VERSION < 0x00904000)
> +#define modssl_PEM_read_bio_X509(b, x, cb, arg) PEM_read_bio_X509(b, x, cb)
> +#else
> +#define modssl_PEM_read_bio_X509(b, x, c
"MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Based on Nadav Har'El's e-mail on the mod_ssl community
> (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modssl&m=103540998016916&w=2),
> here's a patch for 2.0's mod_ssl.
committed, thanks!
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> gregames2002/10/25 11:25:12
>
> Modified:modules/http http_protocol.c
> Log:
> don't apply byte ranges to redirects, error documents, etc.
This needs to be listed in CHANGES.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
"Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> This proposal is from the module developer point of view, so it might be
> totally wrong from the server one.
Can't some of this info be gleaned from ap_mpm_query()? Have you
looked at that?
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Born in Roswel
Carla Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to hear from the actual developers on this! I read back several
> months in the list archives, to get some background.
Technically, the API changes have been pretty minor. A module that
was working with alpha/beta Apache 2 at the beginning o
My comments...
> Hello excellent Apache developers,
>
> I am writing a feature on Apache 2 for crossnodes.com. It will cover new
> features, and quotes from users on why they are, or are not,
> upgrading from
> 1.3. (Besides 'if it ain't broke don't fix it')
>
> Would any of you care to address th
Hello excellent Apache developers,
I am writing a feature on Apache 2 for crossnodes.com. It will cover new
features, and quotes from users on why they are, or are not, upgrading from
1.3. (Besides 'if it ain't broke don't fix it')
Would any of you care to address the following comment? This i
Cliff Woolley wrote:
We should consider (again) setting up some kind of 'submitted patches'
tracking system.
Bugzilla will work fine for that. I try to attach the PatchAvailable
keyword to bugs I see coming in with patches.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>We shouldn't be returning 416 "Invalid Range" for something that's
> redirected, but it sure looks like we are. I wonder what the byterange filter
> does when it sees a redirect response, and there are input Range: headers?
To answer my own question, it's definatel
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
> Can somebody _please_ take some time to review and tell me if the patch is
> okay.
Hey Madhu!
I apologize on behalf of the group for letting patches slip through
the cracks. It's unfortunately the case all too often that
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> I'm very surprised that the first % in your format string
> doesn't need to be escaped.
right. the missing comma was due to a stray keystroke exiting
the editor. the missing '%'.. i'm not sure how that happened.
fixed, anyway.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwed
At 09:56 AM 10/25/2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
>And finally, the API:
>
>1. ap_is_one_process()
>2. ap_get_parent_id()
>3. ap_get_revolution()
>4. ap_get_num_childs()
>
>Thoughts?
First, to -some- degree these sorts of decisions reflect bad
architecture. We -should- have provided the hooks so that
no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Index: request.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/request.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.115
> retrieving revision 1.116
> diff -u -u -r1.115 -r1.116
> --- request.c 5 Sep 2002
Hi,
This proposal is from the module developer point of view, so it might be
totally wrong from the server one.
Simply I wish as a module (I'm trying to write that in a second person;
and certainly in the bad English ;) to be aware of the server status.
More frankly couple of things:
1. Am I bee
24 matches
Mail list logo
