add missing @param docs
Index: include/util_filter.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/include/util_filter.h,v
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -r1.74 util_filter.h
--- include/util_filter.h 28 Jun 2002 08:40:23 -
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/12/03 18:26:44 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related proj
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/10/31 05:57:52 $]
Release:
1.3.28-dev: In development
1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002. Announced Oct 3, 2002.
1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002.
1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not re
* Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> We don't use mixed case for any definitions, and we require braces at
> all times, and for macros longer than one line, we wrap it with a do
> {} while (0) clause so that some compilers are a bit happier.
ah ok, thanks.
> All of that said, I'm not really sure this
--On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 7:21 PM +0100 André Malo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hmm, although "$user:$realm" semantically _is_ the key, that causes
the problem, that mod_authz_dbm won't support it (it currently
doesn't support digest authentication anyway). What would be the
best variant?
--On Wednesday, January 1, 2003 8:31 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -239,6 +256,11 @@
apr_bucket_brigade *bb, *proc_bb;
} deflate_ctx;
+#define LeaveNote(type, value) \
+if (c->note##type##Name) \
+apr_table_setn(r->notes, c->note##type##Name, \
+
Is there any reason for this? (mod_rewrite.c:406 ff)
If not, I'm going to make things like "TXT:" map types possible ;-)
nd
--
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
qq~@{[reverse split/::/ =>__PACKAGE__]}~;
# André Malo # http://www.perlig.de #
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:43:18PM +, Thom May wrote:
> * Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > The log is generated from the suexec binary, not httpd, right?
> > Then we can't use a directive to control it and it needs to be
> > hardcoded for safety.
>
> The other issue for suexec is m
* Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> The log is generated from the suexec binary, not httpd, right?
> Then we can't use a directive to control it and it needs to be
> hardcoded for safety.
The other issue for suexec is mass vhosting; this has somewhat different
needs, and mostly results in
The patch looks good at first glance. Have you done any testing
to see how much it improves performance (on UP and MP machines)
and if it has any effect when APR is build with generic atomics?
-aaron
On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, at 05:30 PM, Brian Pane wrote:
I'm working on replacing some m
The log is generated from the suexec binary, not httpd, right?
Then we can't use a directive to control it and it needs to be
hardcoded for safety.
The patch below to make it relative to the logfiledir at
configure-time makes sense. +1
-aaron
On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, at 04:41 AM, David R
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 11:26, David Burry wrote:
> Apache 2.0.43, Solaris 8, Sun E220R, 4 gig memory, gig ethernet. We tried
> both Sun forte and gcc compilers. The problem was mod_mem_cache was just
> way too resource intensive when pounding on a machine that hard, trying to
> see if everything w
Apache 2.0.43, Solaris 8, Sun E220R, 4 gig memory, gig ethernet. We tried
both Sun forte and gcc compilers. The problem was mod_mem_cache was just
way too resource intensive when pounding on a machine that hard, trying to
see if everything would fit into the cache... cpu/mutexes were very high,
e
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 11:00, Thom May wrote:
> Hey Brian,
> your patch seems to have been eaten by gremlins :-(
Sorry about that, the "send" and "attachment" buttons on
this email program are right next to each other. :-) I just
re-sent with the patch attached.
One other thing I should note: the
Hey Brian,
your patch seems to have been eaten by gremlins :-(
-Thom
* Brian Pane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Here's an updated patch for the worker MPM. It contains
> the pool-recycling changes from my first patch yesterday,
> plus a (mostly) mutex-free implementation of the idle worker
> coun
Here's an updated patch for the worker MPM. It contains
the pool-recycling changes from my first patch yesterday,
plus a (mostly) mutex-free implementation of the idle worker
count.
The logic for this latest change is somewhat more complicated,
so I'd appreciate test results and/or code review fr
Here's an updated patch for the worker MPM. It contains
the pool-recycling changes from my first patch yesterday,
plus a (mostly) mutex-free implementation of the idle worker
count.
The logic for this latest change is somewhat more complicated,
so I'd appreciate test results and/or code review fr
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> nd 2002/12/31 20:08:26
>
> Modified:modules/aaa mod_authn_dbm.c
> Log:
> add support for digest authentication to the authn_dbm module. The
> key is "$user:$realm" (perl speaking), the value is the MD5-hash,
> optionally followed by a colon and
> it may also have to do with caching we were doing (mod_mem_cache crashed and
burned,
What version were you running? What was the failure? If you can give me enough
info to debug the problem, I'll work on it.
Bill
19 matches
Mail list logo
