... yields strange error messages for each "Creating Version Resource"
build step:
16-Bit-MS-DOS-Subsystem:
vcspawn.exe:
The NTVDM-CPU detected an illegal instruction.
What's this about?
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTrac
> 1. using signal is not good, or portable, or threadsafe ;( Is there a
> way to write a mysql sql connection without using signals at all?
>
> 2. connection pools would be a good thing IMHO
#1 is already done, and I am working on #2
> 3. instead of specifying the userfield/passwordfield/table
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/01/27 17:50:43 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related proj
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/02/04 19:08:59 $]
Release:
1.3.28-dev: In development
1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002. Announced Oct 3, 2002.
1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002.
1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not re
The attached patch makes subexpression capturing possible. I've missed this
for a long time ;-)
Any objections to commit it?
Btw: ap_pregsub treats '&' as $0 (whole match). Is it documented somewhere?
Is it used or at least useful somewhere? It looks for me like a legacy,
that should be removed
On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 01:08 PM, Min Xu wrote:
We will soon have two new 8P Sun servers equipped with
Gigabit ethernet coming to our lab. With that, I should be able to
experiment with separate machines.
I'd be very interested in seeing updated results from a multi-machine
network
At 02:51 PM 2/12/2003, Greg Ames wrote:
>I think there should be an MMN bump in the 2.1 stream for this, so independent
>modules can use the new API if they chose to. In 2.0 stable, IMO we should do our
>best to make it transparent.
It's a new feature. +1 on an MMN *minor* bump to 2.0.45-dev
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:35:18AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:52 AM -0600 Min Xu
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >First, I don't think the disk should be bottleneck in any case,
> >this is because the system has 2GB memory, Solaris's file cache is
> >a
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I suggest the following as a friendly compromise to avoid voting...
this sounds like progress.
introduce DISABLE, don't drop ENABLE (especially since your patch would *reverse*
the meaning of the EnableSendfile directive for httpd 2.0.44 built against
a newer apr
At 10:01 AM 2/12/2003, Jess M. Holle wrote:
>There were mutterings that Apache 2.0.45 would be following shortly after 2.0.44.
>It's now been a bit, and I'm left wondering: what is the release timeframe for 2.0.45?
My goal is to tag ASAP - but I'm just back from CA and had too many
deliverables l
Hi Paul.
some quick comments about your code.
1. using signal is not good, or portable, or threadsafe ;( Is there a
way to write a mysql sql connection without using signals at all?
2. connection pools would be a good thing IMHO
3. instead of specifying the userfield/passwordfield/table as dire
Hi Min.
I'm not sure if this would make a difference in 2.0.43,
but you might want to configure apache to use non-portable-atomics
--enable-nonportable-atomics=yes
I think the worker MPM can then take advantage of this, and remove a
mutex lock (replacing it with a spin) which may give you bett
--On Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:52 AM -0600 Min Xu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First, I don't think the disk should be bottleneck in any case,
this is because the system has 2GB memory, Solaris's file cache is
able to cache all the file content. top shows the following stats:
The size of me
Title: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris
Question : Did you run into any problems when
you used Apache (not 2.0.44) + OpenSSL in 64-bit mode
earlier ?
I'm asking this because I remember having run into a
64-bit porting issue with OpenSSL (long time back, on HP-UX) - like a file no
Pier, and others:
> Cannot load /opt/apache/modules/mod_status.so into
> server: ld.so.1:
> /opt/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
> /opt/apache/modules/mod_status.so: symbol
__floatdisf:
> referenced symbol not found
I discovered the above mentioned discussion while I
was plagued w
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:52:03AM -0600, Min Xu wrote:
> with normal file size:
> 0us delay: system xput ~= 2500 pages/sec
> 3us delay: system xput ~= 4700 pages/sec
>
> with 2byte file size:
> 0us delay: system xput ~= 1900 pages/sec
> 3us delay: system xput ~= 1700 pages/sec
> 10us del
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 12:30:28AM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> Of course the client isn't spinning, but your statement that "the server
> should have done its job" assumes that the entire response is sent at
> once. Depending on its length, it is entirely possible that the server
> would send th
There were mutterings that Apache 2.0.45 would be following shortly
after 2.0.44. It's now been a bit, and I'm left wondering: what is the
release timeframe for 2.0.45?
--
Jess Holle
Hi Maik,
> And here follows the patch (My proposed changes to the HTML docu are now not
> included in the patch. Please advice me if and how to post this changes to
> mod_headers.html.en)
Just post it here or to the docs-list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) as a unified
diff patch (diff -u). But please be a
> Cool..
> Can you please post the patch to the list, so that ppl can review the
> code,
> and give their comments.
> -Madhu
No problem!
Here is my short README describing the patch and its history form Apache
version 2.0.43 to 2.0.44:
Hello!
This is the distribution point for the Apache 2.0 as
Sander Striker wrote:
This patch might be incomplete in that I'm not completely sure how to
handle the exports. Basically ap_[gs]et_module_config should always
be in exports.c.
Secondly, while looking at util_debug.c, I see that we have more
functions we conditionally define. We may want to de
Hello,
Does anyone have any additional ideas on how this can be fixed?
-Frank
-Original Message-
From: André Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PR 13211
* Frank Faubert wrote:
> Add "CookieTracking on" to the e
Maik Mueller wrote:
1. SSL_CLIENT_CERT produces multi-line output and the RequestHeader
directive isn't able to transfer it into a correct multi-line HTTP header.
As I understand it, headers may span multiple lines (correct me if I am
wrong). Therefore if RequestHeader isn't able to handle mul
Hello All,
I want to provide updated information to my earlier described scenario using
mod_ssl + mod_proxy + mod_headers:
Component: Web Browser --- Proxy (mod_proxy) --- Web Server
SSL Role: SSL Client --- SSL server | SSL Client --- SSL Server
The following discussion focuses
This patch might be incomplete in that I'm not completely sure how to
handle the exports. Basically ap_[gs]et_module_config should always
be in exports.c.
Secondly, while looking at util_debug.c, I see that we have more
functions we conditionally define. We may want to define those all
the time
Title: Problem with SSL in 64 bit build on Solaris
Hi there !
I'm sorry to come again with this, but it is quite important to us : is someone looking at the bug 16333 I opened a few weeks ago ? I don't need a solution right now, but I would be relieved if I know that someone's looking at it.
26 matches
Mail list logo
