Re: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread Ben Collins-Sussman
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >1. revamp mod_dav's use of pools internally. > > > > This means adding pool arguments to the various "layers" of > > function calls within mod_dav. Each caller controls subpool > > creation, and possibly passes a subpool into a subordina

IBM HTTP Server 2.0.42.1 - AIX 4.3

2003-05-29 Thread Rahul Kohli
Hi, I am using apache 2.0.42 based IBM HTTP Server on AIX 4.3. On editing the httpd.conf with LoadModule directive for the library of my application. I am facing the following error: Syntax error on line 146 of /usr/IBMIHS/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /home/user5/app/lib/my_lib.so into server:

[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Thu May 29 00:08:33 EDT 2003

2003-05-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/05/21 16:21:19 $] Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]: 2.1.0 : in development Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related proj

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Thu May 29 00:08:30 EDT 2003

2003-05-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/05/27 20:35:46 $] Release: 2.0.46 : in development 2.0.45 : released April 1, 2003 as GA. 2.0.44 : released January 20, 2003 as GA. 2.0.43 : released October 3, 2002 as GA.

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed May 28 23:45:12 EDT 2003

2003-05-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/05/21 16:21:19 $] Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]: 2.1.0 : in development Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related proj

[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed May 28 23:45:07 EDT 2003

2003-05-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/05/23 15:25:59 $] Release: 1.3.28-dev: In development. Jim proposes a release around May 23rd 2003 and offers to be RM. 1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002. Announced Oct

RE: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread Bennett, Tony - CNF
If this is a wish list... I'd kinda like to see dav_fs_set_headers() (in repos.c) be able to handle content-type. Here's the comment contained in that function: /* ### how to set the content type? */ /* ### until this is resolved, the Content-Type header is busted */ -tony -Original M

Re: [PATCH] HPUX Apache 1.3

2003-05-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 here. Tested. William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > We've discussed and adopted this patch on the apr/httpd-2.0 side of the world. > The original code dates back to the initial implemenation of the dso code for > Apache 1.3 by rse. Does anyone have any issues with adopting this patch > so that vari

Re: [PATCH] HPUX Apache 1.3

2003-05-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'd be +1 for having it for HPUX only, but -1 for it being for all platforms. "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" wrote: > > +1 > > (BTW, do ppl have objections to have BIND_VERBOSE option for shl_load in > httpd-2.0/apr side. I was planning to introduce it, as it helps a lot to > debug u

RE: [PATCH] HPUX Apache 1.3

2003-05-29 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:35 PM -0400 "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (BTW, do ppl have objections to have BIND_VERBOSE option for shl_load in httpd-2.0/apr side. I was planning to introduce it, as it helps a lot to debug unresolved symbols) jorton took

RE: [PATCH] HPUX Apache 1.3

2003-05-29 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
+1 (BTW, do ppl have objections to have BIND_VERBOSE option for shl_load in httpd-2.0/apr side. I was planning to introduce it, as it helps a lot to debug unresolved symbols) -Madhu >-Original Message- >From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1

Is it a subrequest, a redirect or a fast redirect?

2003-05-29 Thread Bill Stoddard
mod_expires (with my latest patch ) is still broken. The expires header will not be added when the resource is resolved via a DirectoryIndex (ie, a fast redirect) . mod_expires will not add the expires filter to what it believes to be a subrequest and a simple check of (r->main != NULL) is not

Re: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:50 PM 5/28/2003, Cliff Woolley wrote: >On Wed, 28 May 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> It makes me wonder... today we have to create and destroy the pool. >> But what about reuse? The overhead of creating the pool itself? It seems >> like a good extention to the apr_pool api if we had

[PATCH] HPUX Apache 1.3

2003-05-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
We've discussed and adopted this patch on the apr/httpd-2.0 side of the world. The original code dates back to the initial implemenation of the dso code for Apache 1.3 by rse. Does anyone have any issues with adopting this patch so that various libraries load correctly with Apache 1.3 on HPUX? (P

Re: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 28 May 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > It makes me wonder... today we have to create and destroy the pool. > But what about reuse? The overhead of creating the pool itself? It seems > like a good extention to the apr_pool api if we had an apr_pool_recycle > function that would do the

Re: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread Bill Stoddard
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:32 AM -0700 Chris Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Catacomb mailing list.) Perhaps it would be worthwhile to branch off to a sub mailing list for this effort? Nah. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just fine, thank you. =) Yep, keep the discus

Re: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:41 PM 5/28/2003, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote: >Chris Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Yes yes yes! If you need help, I'm a willing >> sucker/victim/volunteer. ;^o As is, I'm sure, all of the Catacomb >> back-end developers. (I've cc'd the Catacomb mailing list.) Perhaps it >> would be wo

Re: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:12 PM 5/28/2003, you wrote: >Hi, I'm a new subscriber to this list, but not a complete stranger >either. Hi Ben... around here you are no stranger than most :-) >I'm writing because I plan to do some major overhauling of mod_dav. Comments inline, but kudos for taking this on... >1. revam

Re: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread Bill Stoddard
roviders, such as mod_dav_fs. Comments? I am not a heavy dav user, but definitely +1 to getting mod_dav to work better with svn. Bill

Re: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:32 AM -0700 Chris Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Catacomb mailing list.) Perhaps it would be worthwhile to branch off to a sub mailing list for this effort? Nah. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just fine, thank you. =) I would suggest that this would be the time to clea

Re: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread Ben Collins-Sussman
Chris Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Collins-Sussman wrote: > > >[...] > > > >I'm writing because I plan to do some major overhauling of mod_dav. > >No need to fear, because I'm essentially a disciple of gstein. :-) > >I'm reasonably familiar with mod_dav code already, because I'm > >i

Re: mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread Chris Knight
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote: [...] I'm writing because I plan to do some major overhauling of mod_dav. No need to fear, because I'm essentially a disciple of gstein. :-) I'm reasonably familiar with mod_dav code already, because I'm intimate with the mod_dav_svn provider (Subversion's main server.

mod_dav overhaul

2003-05-29 Thread Ben Collins-Sussman
Hi, I'm a new subscriber to this list, but not a complete stranger either. My name is Ben Collins-Sussman, and I'm one of the original Subversion developers. I'm also an APR committer, and well... I know a whole lot of people on this list, and met many more of you at the last Apachecon. I'm wri

Re: [VOTE]: Apache 2.0.46

2003-05-29 Thread Bill Stoddard
Bill Stoddard wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'd like to call a vote to release STRIKER_2_0_46_PRE2 as httpd-2.0.46. +1 (assuming the mod_expires change reverted) or fixed? Check my latest commit. okay, forget that. It will be in 2.0.47 Bill

Re: [VOTE]: Apache 2.0.46

2003-05-29 Thread Bill Stoddard
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 9:07 PM +0200 Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to call a vote to release STRIKER_2_0_46_PRE2 as httpd-2.0.46. +1 on _PRE3 (which is _PRE2 minus mod_expires brokenness) for Solaris, Darwin, and FreeBSD. -- justin +1 (with

Re: [VOTE]: Apache 2.0.46

2003-05-29 Thread Bill Stoddard
Jeff Trawick wrote: Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'd like to call a vote to release STRIKER_2_0_46_PRE2 as httpd-2.0.46. +1 (assuming the mod_expires change reverted) or fixed? Check my latest commit. Bill

Re: mod_expires is broken was Re: [VOTE]: Apache 2.0.46

2003-05-29 Thread Bill Stoddard
Jeff Trawick wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:29 PM -0700 Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ExpiresDefault is busted. The offending line is mod_expires.c:531. t = apr_table_overlay(r->pool, notes->expfields, t); apr_table_overlay may create a new table