Re: mystery solved... perhaps.

2004-01-26 Thread Ben Collins-Sussman
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 08:07, Joe Orton wrote: > Nice, this is easy enough to reproduce. It only fills up because the > httpd children all have the read end of the pipe open, which is a bug in > itself. Applying below ensures that the pipe gets closed when the piped > logger exits, and so writes(

Re: [PATCH] raise MAX_SERVER_LIMIT

2004-01-26 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 04:25:58PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >*sigh*, forensic_id didn't catch it, > > forensic_id is just for crash in child I know, but I couldnt rule out a crash in the child being a root cause ... until now, it doesn't look like it's trigger by a particular URI anyway. > >

Re: doc patch - http_protocol.h

2004-01-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
Aryeh Katz wrote: # diff -u http_protocol.old.h http_protocol.h --- http_protocol.old.h +++ http_protocol.h @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ * @param r The current request * @param pw The password as set in the headers * @return 0 (OK) if it set the 'pw' argument (and assured - * a correct value

Re: [PATCH] raise MAX_SERVER_LIMIT

2004-01-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:28:03PM +, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: I'd love to find out what's causing your worker failures. Are you using any thread-unsafe modules or libraries? Not to my knowledge, I wasn't planning to do this till later, but I've bumped to 2.1, I'll try

Re: [PATCH] raise MAX_SERVER_LIMIT

2004-01-26 Thread Glenn
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:37:23PM +, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:28:03PM +, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > > > I'd love to find out what's causing your worker failures. Are you using > > > any thread-unsafe modules or libraries? > > > > Not to my knowledge, I wasn't

doc patch - http_protocol.h

2004-01-26 Thread Aryeh Katz
I leave the formatting up to you, but the patch follows: # diff -u http_protocol.old.h http_protocol.h --- http_protocol.old.h +++ http_protocol.h @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ * @param r The current request * @param pw The password as set in the headers * @return 0 (OK) if it set the 'pw' argument (a

hi

2004-01-26 Thread tolj
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. document.zip Description: Binary data

Re: Proposal: Allow ServerTokens to specify Server header completely

2004-01-26 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Aaron Bannert wrote: > I think one should have to change the source code in order to > have this level of control over the Server: header. I strongly agree. --Cliff

Re: [PATCH] raise MAX_SERVER_LIMIT

2004-01-26 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:28:03PM +, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > > I'd love to find out what's causing your worker failures. Are you using > > any thread-unsafe modules or libraries? > > Not to my knowledge, I wasn't planning to do this till later, but > I've bumped to 2.1, I'll try out the fo

Re: apache bug archive?

2004-01-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
Min Xu(Hsu) wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 Jeff Trawick wrote : data race? consider http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25520 Thanks. I was able to reproduce this one. hopefully without the fix which I subsequently committed to 2.1-dev :) (gotta propose that one for backport I guess

Re: Proposal: Allow ServerTokens to specify Server header completely

2004-01-26 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:04:06PM +, Ivan Ristic wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > >I'd like to get some sort of feedback concerning the idea > >of having ServerTokens not only "adjust" what Apache > >sends in the Server header, but also allow the directive > >to fully set that info. > > > >F

Re: [PATCH] raise MAX_SERVER_LIMIT

2004-01-26 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:09:20AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:04:38PM +, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > > There were other changes co-incidental to that, like going to 12Gb > > of RAM, which certainly helped, so it's hard to narrow it down too > > much. > > Ok with 18

Re: [PATCH] raise MAX_SERVER_LIMIT

2004-01-26 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:04:38PM +, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > There were other changes co-incidental to that, like going to 12Gb > of RAM, which certainly helped, so it's hard to narrow it down too > much. Ok with 18,000 or so child processes (all in the run queue) what does your load look

page out of date

2004-01-26 Thread Aryeh Katz
http://apache.get-software.com/httpd/binaries/win32/README.html doesn't have the correct version numbers. As an aside, would it make more sense to use SSI, and get the version number from the SERVER_SOFTWARE environment variable (I assume apache.org will always be running the most up to date vers

Darn: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ssl ssl_engine_io.c

2004-01-26 Thread Ben Hyde
On Jan 23, 2004, at 9:28 PM, PENPRAPA MUNKID wrote: more info www.naraico.. Sorry, I moderated that thru before I realized that it was a form of spam. Consider this a warning to other moderators. That was a reply to a commit message with the spam'ers website hanging off the more info link