On Mar 12, 2004, at 11:01 AM, Andre Breiler wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Brian Pane wrote:
That definitely sounds useful. I think you can get the same effect,
though, by using the existing 2.0/2.1 mod_include hook to add new
directives... something like this:
That's not quite as syntac
* Guenter Knauf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Hi Thom,
> > This really ought to be 4 seperate patches for ease of review.
> > Please can you resend as such?
> something's wrong with the four splitted patches, or simply no time to review??
>
Damn, dude. it's only been 1 *work*day.
-Thom
Hi Thom,
> This really ought to be 4 seperate patches for ease of review.
> Please can you resend as such?
something's wrong with the four splitted patches, or simply no time to review??
Guenter.
Sounds good, I will review the change and get mpm_netware fixed up to
use the mpm_common.c directive.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, March 15, 2004 4:10:11 PM >>>
Jeff T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nd 2004/03/15 12:45:59
Modified:docs/manual/mod leader.xml mpm_common.xml perchild.xml
prefork.xml threadpool.xml worker.xml
Log:
add initial documentation for EnableExceptionHook. Please review.
Index: mpm_common.xml
===
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Brad Nicholes wrote:
NetWare has a directive called ThreadStackSize which has been in use
for a number of years. The main reason for this directive on NetWare
was due to the fixed stack in the OS. Would it make more sense to call
the new directive ThreadStackSize rather th
Hi,
> A +1 after the patch should put us on the track for releasing it.
> Testers?
> Makefile.win on HEAD and APACHE_2_0_BRANCH should be golden.
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/Makefile.win?rev=1.120.2.14
+1; works again for me ; the ssl*.conf files are no longer empty.
Guenter.
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:05, Sander Striker wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
> > * Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
> > > Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
> >
> > I'm going to backport th
+1 NetWare
Jean-Jacques>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/13/2004 5:32:53 AM >>>
Hi,There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/The differences with respect to the rc1 tarball are:- BeOS specific MPM fixes- Netware specific rand.c fixes- Documentation update- Berkeley DB
Hi,
> On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
>> * Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
>> > Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
>>
>> I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook docs. Please put them
>> also int
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:19:00PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> martin 2004/03/15 12:19:00
>
> Modified:server Makefile.in
> Log:
> Add missing source
It was already there, I've reverted this. Did you run buildconf after
updating?
> util_script.c util_md5.c util_cfg
At 03:05 PM 3/15/2004, Sander Striker wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
>> * Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
>> > Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
>>
>> I'm going to backport the enableexcep
* Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
> > * Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
> > > Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
> >
> > I'm going to backport the enab
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This is not a regression issue, but it is a storage corruption issue as
well as a simple fix that should be easy to review:
*) mod_cgid: Fix storage corruption caused by
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
> * Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
> > Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
>
> I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook docs. Please put them
> also into the next
* Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
> Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook docs. Please put them
also into the next tag.
Thanks!
nd
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I would +1 moving over after release of 2.0.49 and 1.3.30... :)
+1
Bill
I would +1 moving over after release of 2.0.49 and 1.3.30... :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 20:29, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > --On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
> > > parti
Sander Striker wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This is not a regression issue, but it is a storage corruption issue as well as
a simple fix that should be easy to review:
*) mod_cgid: Fix storage corruption caused by use of incorrect pool.
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 20:39, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
> > - Not as portable (?)
>
> (Subversion clients/servers run anywhere APR does. I think that's
> actually more portable than CVS, since I don't
Brad Nicholes wrote:
NetWare has a directive called ThreadStackSize which has been in use
for a number of years. The main reason for this directive on NetWare
was due to the fixed stack in the OS. Would it make more sense to call
the new directive ThreadStackSize rather than WorkerStackSize to
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 1:29 PM -0600 "C. Michael Pilato"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Justin, what's being done about unversioned properties (since those
can change at any time)? Do you have post-revprop-change hook setup
to squirrel away those mods so that they could be restored should the
w
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
> - Not as portable (?)
(Subversion clients/servers run anywhere APR does. I think that's
actually more portable than CVS, since I don't believe CVS pserver runs
on win32 at all.)
Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
> > parties are invaluable. What is the equivalent to rsync, and is it as sta
NetWare has a directive called ThreadStackSize which has been in use
for a number of years. The main reason for this directive on NetWare
was due to the fixed stack in the OS. Would it make more sense to call
the new directive ThreadStackSize rather than WorkerStackSize to avoid
two different
Something test-dev has kicked around that we should pick back up...
>Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:44:45 -0500 (CDT)
>From: Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
>There's a number of changes needed due to the current
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 1:02 PM -0500 Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
...
- Backups/integrity (fixable?)
Not to beat a dead horse, but I think that's an advantage with Subversion:
on-the-wire checksums, repository checksums, (incremental) backups
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> As I mentioned to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]'ers I would feel much safer moving 2.1-dev
> over to SVN (with APR 1.0) and leaving 2.0/apr 0.9 alone to the end of
> their useful life.
Ugh. That sounds like it will make back-porting even more of a pain
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 4:47 AM -0800 Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
people have worked very hard to make it work, and its good. But at the same
time, one should be careful of falling into the "when you have a new hammer
everything looks like a nail" trap.
Subversion serves *exactly*
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was rejected as an option
when I suggested it, so I'm assuming that doesn't happen), then they must be
signed by the server - a successful attacker can therefore sig
Hi,
As said in the subject...
The attached file ApacheMonitor.exe.manifest needs to be copied in the
/support/win32/ dir.
Index: ApacheMonitor.rc
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/support/win32/ApacheMonitor.rc,v
retrieving rev
your going to be forcing people to install some other piece of software.
while this might be fine for a lot of people, some won't or can't.
Some IDE's don't have SVN support yet, and some people have to deal with
sysadmins who think redhat 5.2 is acceptable work environment to develop
with.
I'm
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:32:01PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 05:18:19PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:04:31PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:22:24AM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> > > > Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:44, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
[...]
> > And in bsd/os 5.1 we have
> >
> > Syntax error on line 252 of /var/www/conf/httpd.conf:
> > Cannot load /usr/libexec/apache/mod_expires.so into server:
> > /usr/libexec/apache/mod_expires.so: Undefined PLT symbol
> >
The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 05:18:19PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:04:31PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:22:24AM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1
It seems libtool does not know how to build shared libraries on BSD/OS
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 11:52, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > --On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
> >> parties are invaluable. What is th
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
parties are invaluable. What is the equivalent to rsync, and is it as
stable?
I think you mean cvsup not r
--On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
parties are invaluable. What is the equivalent to rsync, and is it as stable?
I think you mean cvsup not rsync. We're currently crea
* Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> your going to be forcing people to install some other piece of software.
> while this might be fine for a lot of people, some won't or can't.
> Some IDE's don't have SVN support yet, and some people have to deal with
> sysadmins who think redhat 5.2 is a
40 matches
Mail list logo
