Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Jess Holle
Graham Leggett wrote: Jess Holle wrote: My feedback was mainly attached to bug #18756 . This bug is still present in 2.0.49. I do not know if it is a true duplicate as indicated or not. I just know it does not work. I also had reported

Re: Dechunking code in Apache 2.0.49

2004-06-04 Thread Graham Leggett
Jim Jagielski wrote: I think there's been soem discussion, onlist as well as via Bugzilla, on the best way to handle this. Personally, I think that if the client sent chunked, we should pass that through to the origin server. As I remember, the client should try to remember whether the server does

Re: Antw: Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Andre Schild
Hello Guenter, I had just some tests with Jess, and now I am able to build a working mod_ldap for 2.0.49 It is in fact a problem, depending which MS SDK you use. With the old SDK I used previously (Whistler Beta1 March 2001) the mod_ldap stuff crashes. I have then rebuilt it with the MS SDK Sp

Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Graham Leggett
Jess Holle wrote: My feedback was mainly attached to bug #18756 . This bug is still present in 2.0.49. I do not know if it is a true duplicate as indicated or not. I just know it does not work. I also had reported 24801

Re: Dechunking code in Apache 2.0.49

2004-06-04 Thread Mathias Herberts
Jim Jagielski wrote: On Jun 3, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Mathias Herberts wrote: Hi, I've been deploying Apache 1.3 instances for many years now, relying heavily on the mod_proxy / mod_rewrite couple to build our HTTP backbone. In the past year I've met a problem with the proxying of requests made by MI

Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Jess Holle
My feedback was mainly attached to bug #18756.  This bug is still present in 2.0.49.  I do not know if it is a true duplicate as indicated or not.  I just know it does not work. I also had reported 24801 (crash on cache overflow).  I believe I tested it with the fix for bug #29207 some time ba

Re: Antw: Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Andre, > Any chance you could send me your mod_ldap.so & util_ldap.so for windows ? > So I can compare/test them with my modules ? have you tried a build with Netscape SDK? You can get binaries from my site: http://www.gknw.com/development/apache/ however I have not tested ldap on Win32 for long

Re: Dechunking code in Apache 2.0.49

2004-06-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 3, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Mathias Herberts wrote: Hi, I've been deploying Apache 1.3 instances for many years now, relying heavily on the mod_proxy / mod_rewrite couple to build our HTTP backbone. In the past year I've met a problem with the proxying of requests made by MIDP (mobile devices)

Re: reading string in apache

2004-06-04 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Who write or modificate code mod_ssl or other module? Respond to me, please. A number of people have contributed to the mod_ssl that ships with Apache 2.0. > How can read string, if standart "C" function not work in apache. > What is method read? I'

Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Graham Leggett
Jess Holle wrote: On UNIX? See the bug for what details I managed to muster at some point. Can you point out which bug, there were lots that I opened and closed, I just want to make sure I didn't close a bug that should be still open. Regards, Graham --

Antw: Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Andre Schild
Hello, I too have downloaded the most current SDK available, but it still crashes. On what Windows are you running the apache server ? Any chance you could send me your mod_ldap.so & util_ldap.so for windows ? So I can compare/test them with my modules ? André >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.06.2004

Antw: Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Andre Schild
For Windows 2000 it's included in the bug report. Not sure if it whas for 2.1 or 2.0.50, it crashed in both, and always in the WLDAP32 DLL http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18334 André >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.06.2004 17:17:31 >>> Jess Holle wrote: > Hmmm We've had no su

Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Jess Holle
Graham Leggett wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Hmmm We've had no such problems on 2.0.48 or 2.0.49 on Windows. We did have such problems attempting to build against any Microsoft SDK prior to the Spring 2003 update, however Now we just have this problem on UNIX with mod_worker. Can you post a

Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Graham Leggett
Jess Holle wrote: Hmmm We've had no such problems on 2.0.48 or 2.0.49 on Windows. We did have such problems attempting to build against any Microsoft SDK prior to the Spring 2003 update, however Now we just have this problem on UNIX with mod_worker. Can you post a stacktrace of it when i

Re: mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Jess Holle
Hmmm We've had no such problems on 2.0.48 or 2.0.49 on Windows. We did have such problems attempting to build against any Microsoft SDK prior to the Spring 2003 update, however Now we just have this problem on UNIX with mod_worker. Andre Schild wrote: Hello, is anyone using the mod_ldap

mod_ldap & Win32

2004-06-04 Thread Andre Schild
Hello, is anyone using the mod_ldap module on win32 platform ? We have used it up to build 2.0.48 with (almost) no problems. But we can't get the mod_ldap from 2.0.49 or from the 2.1 to work. The problem is, that apache.exe will crash on the first request who actually does a authentication via L

reading string in apache

2004-06-04 Thread apache_dev
Who write or modificate code mod_ssl or other module? Respond to me, please. How can read string, if standart "C" function not work in apache. What is method read?

Re: Dechunking code in Apache 2.0.49

2004-06-04 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 01:48:31AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > Mathias Herberts wrote: > > >What is the position of the Apache community on the passing of 'hop by > >hop' headers to origin servers by mod_proxy? The code in proxy_http.c > >says 'RFC2616 13.5.1 says we should strip these header