Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm currently working on code that extended the lb method
within the 2.1/2.2 proxy from what is basically a
weighted request count to also be a weighted
traffic count (as measured by bytes transferred)
and a weighted "load" count (as measured by response
time). The former is fu
Le 3 janv. 05, à 21:36, Geoffrey Young a écrit :
This can be done quite safely in Apache1, by the way.
I don't believe it can. Code?
Well, since you don't need to worry about thread safety as long as
you set
it on every request, or reset it after each request you are fine.
Something like:
foo
On Jan 7, 2005, at 4:14 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 8:52 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Working on some load balancing methods
I'm currently working on code that extended the lb method within the
2.1/2.2 proxy from wha
Cliff Woolley wrote:
It might be. We've considered having it be configurable before. There
are just a lot of implications in changing the value; for example, it
affects the memory footprint of the server, it affects how much data gets
read in to memory per read() call on a file bucket (which migh
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> I still think it would be worthwhile to make it configurable. Linux or
> FreeBSD5 on IA64 with 16k pages, for example, might show some decent
> gains by setting that to 15000. Or do a getpagesize() call on startup
> to determine it dynamically.
It mig
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'm currently working on code that extended the lb method within the
> 2.1/2.2 proxy from what is basically a weighted request count to also be
> a weighted traffic count (as measured by bytes transferred) and a
> weighted "load" count (as measured by r
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Why is it hardcoded to be 8000? It would seem like you could easily be
> unlucky and just miss the cutoff and end up with a 6000 byte heap bucket
> followed by a 3000 byte transient bucket, for example, as a result of 3
> 3000 byte ap_rwrites. For th
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm currently working on code that extended the lb method
within the 2.1/2.2 proxy from what is basically a
weighted request count to also be a weighted
traffic count (as measured by bytes transferred)
and a weighted "load" count (as measured by response
time).
Sure, the genera