httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004-11-24 19:36:41 -0500 (Wed, 24 Nov 2004) $]
Stuff to do:
* finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if
framework failed)
* change existing tests that frob the
we are pleased to announce the latest Apache-Test release, 1.22.
the important change to note for this release is that mod_perl support is
incompatible with mod_perl versions 1.999_21 and earlier. in other words if
you are a mod_perl user only upgrade to this release if you also plan to
upgrade
Geoffrey Young wrote:
we are pleased to announce the latest Apache-Test release, 1.22.
the important change to note for this release is that mod_perl support is
incompatible with mod_perl versions 1.999_21 and earlier.
by earlier Geoff meant 1.99_xx .. 1.999_20 (the mp2-tobe versions). It
doesn't
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
we are pleased to announce the latest Apache-Test release, 1.22.
the important change to note for this release is that mod_perl support is
incompatible with mod_perl versions 1.999_21 and earlier.
by earlier Geoff meant 1.99_xx .. 1.999_20
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:09:38PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please one request; be as specific as you can about OS flavor and
kernel, these things help us to grok exactly how widely the current
build is being tested.
FYI, on FreeBSD, port of release candidates are available for
Hi,
When I run a simple perl script which displays $0, with mod_cgi
enabled I get the whole path. However with mod_cgid I get just the
basename and not the whole path. Is this behaviour an expected
behaviour with cgid or is there some configuration that must be done
to get the whole path.
Thanks
On Thursday 14 April 2005 5:09 am, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:24 PM 4/13/2005, Christian Parpart wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 9:25 am, Sander Striker wrote:
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
not that I'm an apache dev - within the ASF. But I've
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
Given the reponses and the fact that it has been hosting most
of our own webtraffic for a bit I conclude it is looking good for
release.
We're investigating possible issues in the system. One comment
from a kernel developer:
We are returning EWOULDBLOCK because the socket is in non-blocking.
Inspecting the socket, so_state is 0x182 (0x100 is SS_NBIO).
Setting
a breakpoint on soioctl for SS_NBIO I can clearly see
On April 13, 2005 11:46 pm, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
TODO ISSUES REMAINING IN MOD_SSL:
[snip]
* the shmcb code should just align its memory segment rather than
jumping through all the safe memcpy and memset hoops
FWIW, I wrote a mockup for this and left it with a couple of devs
On Apr 12, 2005, at 12:25 AM, Sander Striker wrote:
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
I ran on Darwin 7.8.0, FreeBSD 4.10 and Red Hat 8.0. Threw PHP 5.0.4
into the mix for amusement and to get a bunch of extra tests running. I
then ran against 2.0.53 for
I was taking a look at the implementation of the renamed (but still
misleading) AP_MODE_EATCRLF, in an attempt to figure out what a
conforming input filter ought to do if it's handed that mode.
Some comments:
1) The loop in server/core_filters.c:226
while (c str + len) {
12 matches
Mail list logo
