AP_MODE_EATCRLF considered indigestible

2005-04-14 Thread Rici Lake
I was taking a look at the implementation of the renamed (but still misleading) AP_MODE_EATCRLF, in an attempt to figure out what a conforming input filter ought to do if it's handed that mode. Some comments: 1) The loop in server/core_filters.c:226 while (c < str + len) {

Re: 2.0.54 release candidate tarball available for testing

2005-04-14 Thread Sander Temme
On Apr 12, 2005, at 12:25 AM, Sander Striker wrote: Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;) I ran on Darwin 7.8.0, FreeBSD 4.10 and Red Hat 8.0. Threw PHP 5.0.4 into the mix for amusement and to get a bunch of extra tests running. I then ran against 2.0.53 for compari

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Apr 13 23:46:37 2005

2005-04-14 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On April 13, 2005 11:46 pm, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > TODO ISSUES REMAINING IN MOD_SSL: [snip] > * the shmcb code should just align its memory segment rather than > jumping through all the "safe" memcpy and memset hoops FWIW, I wrote a mockup for this and left it with a couple of d

Re: svn commit: r160348 - httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core_filters.c

2005-04-14 Thread Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
We're investigating possible issues in the system. One comment from a kernel developer: We are returning EWOULDBLOCK because the socket is in non-blocking. Inspecting the socket, so_state is 0x182 (0x100 is SS_NBIO). Setting a breakpoint on soioctl for SS_NBIO I can clearly see

Re: 2.0.54 release candidate tarball available for testing

2005-04-14 Thread Sander Striker
Sander Striker wrote: Hi, As usual the tarballs are at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;) Given the reponses and the fact that it has been hosting most of our own webtraffic for a bit I conclude it is looking good for release. I

Re: 2.0.54 release candidate tarball available for testing

2005-04-14 Thread Christian Parpart
On Thursday 14 April 2005 5:09 am, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > At 01:24 PM 4/13/2005, Christian Parpart wrote: > >On Tuesday 12 April 2005 9:25 am, Sander Striker wrote: > >> Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;) > > > >not that I'm an apache dev - within the ASF. B

$0 prints just the basename in mod_cgid

2005-04-14 Thread pradeep kumar
Hi, When I run a simple perl script which displays $0, with mod_cgi enabled I get the whole path. However with mod_cgid I get just the basename and not the whole path. Is this behaviour an expected behaviour with cgid or is there some configuration that must be done to get the whole path. Thanks

Re: 2.0.54 release candidate tarball available for testing

2005-04-14 Thread Clement Laforet
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:09:38PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Please one request; be as specific as you can about OS flavor and > kernel, these things help us to grok exactly how widely the current > build is being tested. FYI, on FreeBSD, port of release candidates are available for rev