Re: mp2 and mp1

2005-07-09 Thread Michael Peters
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Hi, Are there any docs on getting A-T to place nice with a module that works under both mp1 and mp2.0.0+ ? The httpd.conf files written out load mod_perl.so instead of mod_perl2.so at the moment for me. Are you using Apache::TestMM or Apache::TestMB? When you

[PATCH[ feather.gif

2005-07-09 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Stop 'wget'ing the blasted feather.gif especially since wget doesn't exist by default on FreeBSD. snv diff feather.gif Makefile.am Index: feather.gif === Cannot display: file marked as a binary type. svn:mime-type =

2.0.6-dev [docs preview]

2005-07-09 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
If anyone wants to preview the docs for 2.0.6-dev, you can see them here: http://libapreq2.p6m7g8.net/ please use the offical site once 2.0.6-dev is released http://httpd.apache.org/apreq/docs/libapreq2/ END What doesn't kill

Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project

2005-07-09 Thread Sander Temme
On Jul 7, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I therefore Call A Vote on whether we should support mod_ftp for inclusion into the Incubator and if we should accept mod_ftp upon graduation from the Incubator. +1 S. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP FP:

Re: Please test 2.06-dev-rc1

2005-07-09 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Please test and report back. in cd glue/perl gmake test TEST_VERBOSE=1 TEST_FILES=t/apreq/request.t Just confirming that this fails under 5.8.7, 2.0.54 prefork, and mp 2.0.2-dev as well. -- END What

Re: 1.3 and 2.0 releases?

2005-07-09 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 7/8/05, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know a few folks were expecting this note last Friday... here's the scoop. Jeff's patch to 2.0 was lovely. What's not lovely is that the chunked request processing has been hosed since at least 2.0.54. As much as I'd rather just

Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project

2005-07-09 Thread Jeff McAdams
Jeff Trawick wrote: On 7/7/05, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I therefore Call A Vote on whether we should support mod_ftp for inclusion into the Incubator and if we should accept mod_ftp upon graduation from the Incubator. +1 (not that you need any more votes) FTP can be crufty,

non-detaching httpd

2005-07-09 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, I'd like to stop httpd from detaching itself, so I can start it from init. How can this be done ? cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service phone: +49 36207 519931 www:

Re: non-detaching httpd

2005-07-09 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to stop httpd from detaching itself, so I can start it from init. How can this be done ? httpd -X if you want a single non-forking non-detached process httpd -F if you just want the main process to be non-detached and still have it

Re: [vote(s)] [Patch 1.3] Strict proxy C-L / T-E conformance

2005-07-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jul 8, 2005, at 10:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: [22 hours - ping] Votes please? 2/3 of our users use 1.3, do you? Jim reminded me we don't ap_strtol everywhere, so the NULL check I guess remains a good idea, as would a (len_end == content_length) test which I will add before

Re: mod_mbox and i18n

2005-07-09 Thread Garrett Rooney
Maxime Petazzoni wrote: Hi, Last week, we've been discussing what mod_mbox should output (XML+XSLT or XHTML?) and we seemed to settle our minds on a simple XHTML output for the interface, plus of course the XML backend for AJAX sub-requests. Still, someone on the #apache-modules IRC channel

Re: mod_mbox and i18n

2005-07-09 Thread Maxime Petazzoni
There's no reason the strings have to be hard coded into the C code. You can pull them out into some sort of language specific file, just like any other C program that worries about i18n. This would mean more file I/O every time mod_mbox runs, and maybe using an external library such as

Re: mod_mbox and i18n

2005-07-09 Thread Sander Striker
Maxime Petazzoni wrote: There's no reason the strings have to be hard coded into the C code. You can pull them out into some sort of language specific file, just like any other C program that worries about i18n. This would mean more file I/O every time mod_mbox runs, and maybe using an

mp2 and mp1

2005-07-09 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Hi, Are there any docs on getting A-T to place nice with a module that works under both mp1 and mp2.0.0+ ? The httpd.conf files written out load mod_perl.so instead of mod_perl2.so at the moment for me. -- END What doesn't

Re: mod_mbox and i18n

2005-07-09 Thread Maxime Petazzoni
? Why not? You can cache the results per language in memory. I have to investigate on how to do this. Any pointers ? For the moment, I don't have enough Apache and APR knowledge not to see in a per-request mode. Not maintainable if you ask me. Code duplication is something we want to