AspNet feature

2005-11-15 Thread Rob Hughes
-Original Message- From: Rob Hughes Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 3:18 PM To: 'CLI Dev' Subject: RE: next version features Hi: Test results using the new AspNet option in the Location directive, with all ExecCGI options removed: AspNet On or All - virtual paths, real paths are

Re: Developer Guidelines (was Re: More efficient FieldStorage, StringField and Field classes)

2005-11-15 Thread Mike Looijmans
Ok, following Jim's advice, an having read his guide, I have so far: - Fetched the trunk version with anonymous SVN (no problem) I've already installed apache 2.0.55 and Python 2.4.1 on this Windows machine (the lazy way, with MSI packages). I've also installed the latest Cygwin (all default

Re: Developer Guidelines (was Re: More efficient FieldStorage, StringField and Field classes)

2005-11-15 Thread Mike Looijmans
David Fraser wrote: See my other mail - basically you do cd dist set APACHESRC=c:\path\to\apache (where this is the Apache2 dir in a standard installation, now need for apache source) build_installer Okay, first I downloaded the .NET SDK. (Our internet connection is great here) Then I

Re: Developer Guidelines (was Re: More efficient FieldStorage, StringField and Field classes)

2005-11-15 Thread David Fraser
Mike Looijmans wrote: David Fraser wrote: See my other mail - basically you do cd dist set APACHESRC=c:\path\to\apache (where this is the Apache2 dir in a standard installation, now need for apache source) build_installer Okay, first I downloaded the .NET SDK. (Our internet connection

Re: mod_python 3.2.5b available for testing

2005-11-15 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
hehe - sorry about that, should be fixed now Grisha On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, David Fraser wrote: Jim Gallacher wrote: A new mod_python 3.2.5 beta tarball is now available for testing. A windows binary should be available shortly. The windows binary for python 2.3 is borked, and contains its

Re: mod_python 3.2.5b available for testing

2005-11-15 Thread Ron Reisor
+1 MacOSX 10.4.3, gcc 4.0.0 (apple), Python-2.4.2, Apache-2.0.55 cheers, Ron On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: A new mod_python 3.2.5 beta tarball is now available for testing. A windows binary should be available shortly. This release is similar to 3.2.4b but fixes a couple of

Re: mod_python 3.2.5b available for testing

2005-11-15 Thread Indrek Järve
+1 on SuSE Linux 9.2 (x86-64) Best regards, Indrek Jim Gallacher wrote: A new mod_python 3.2.5 beta tarball is now available for testing. A windows binary should be available shortly. This release is similar to 3.2.4b but fixes a couple of minor issues - MODPYTHON-87 (psp_parser), and

Re: mod_python 3.2.5b available for testing (gentoo issues)

2005-11-15 Thread Jim Gallacher
+1 with patch Linux gentoo 2.6.12-gentoo-r6 apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork) python 2.4.2 gcc 3.3.6 There are 2 issues with the unit tests in Gentoo that are fixed by the attached patch. (Just to be clear, I mean the problems are with the unit test code, not with mod_python). First,

[PATCH] 2.1.9, proxy_http, sub requests

2005-11-15 Thread Brian Akins
Here's a patch that removes the explicit discrimination against keep-alives for sub requests. -- Brian Akins Lead Systems Engineer CNN Internet Technologies diff -ru httpd-2.1.9-beta/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c httpd-2.1.9-beta-new/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c ---

Re: svn commit: r344369 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/

2005-11-15 Thread Joshua Slive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jim Date: Tue Nov 15 06:50:39 2005 New Revision: 344369 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=344369view=rev Log: Add in the UseCanonicalPhysicalPort directive, which basically allows Apache to configurably ( :) ) use the physical port when constructing the

Re: svn commit: r344369 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/

2005-11-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On November 15, 2005 10:01:09 AM -0500 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: changing a default like this on a 2.0 to 2.2 upgrade, and I'd prefer it you put it back to off. +1. -- justin

Re: svn commit: r344369 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ docs/manual/

2005-11-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On November 15, 2005 10:01:09 AM -0500 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: changing a default like this on a 2.0 to 2.2 upgrade, and I'd prefer it you put it back to off. +1. -- justin Yep... I'll change back to Off. --

Re: svn commit: r344409 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/install.xml

2005-11-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On November 15, 2005 6:41:13 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @@ -97,12 +95,12 @@ tr tda href=#testTest/a/td -tdcode$ emPREFIX/em/bin/apachectl start/code +tdcode$ emPREFIX/em/bin/apachectl -k start/code Really? That'd be the right syntax for httpd, but

Re: svn commit: r344409 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/install.xml

2005-11-15 Thread Joshua Slive
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: -tdcode$ emPREFIX/em/bin/apachectl start/code +tdcode$ emPREFIX/em/bin/apachectl -k start/code Really? That'd be the right syntax for httpd, but not for apachectl. (Looking at apachectl, it looks like it'd just happen to work though.) It works by

Re: svn commit: r344416 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/core.xml docs/manual/server-wide.xml include/ap_mmn.h include/http_core.h server/core.c

2005-11-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On November 15, 2005 7:39:20 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jim Date: Tue Nov 15 11:39:15 2005 New Revision: 344416 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=344416view=rev Log: Fold in the UseCanonicalPhysicalPort code, along with the docs changes (just source currently) This

Feature request: Apache2::Upload permissions

2005-11-15 Thread Edward J. Sabol
I know this has come up on this mailing list before, but I don't think anything came of it. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.) It's a bit of a security issue that there isn't a mechanism to specify the file permissions when you $upload-link(). The only work around that I'm aware of is to chmod()

Re: svn commit: r344416 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES

2005-11-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yep... commiting that edit as we speak. Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On November 15, 2005 7:39:20 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jim Date: Tue Nov 15 11:39:15 2005 New Revision: 344416 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=344416view=rev Log: Fold in the

Auth*Authoritative

2005-11-15 Thread Joshua Slive
I'm trying to wrap my head around the new auth system. All the Auth*Authoritative directives seem to have copied their docs content from someplace that refers to lower level modules (as defined in the modules.c files). What the heck does that mean in an httpd 2.x context? Isn't the ordering

Re: Auth*Authoritative

2005-11-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On November 15, 2005 3:33:56 PM -0500 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to wrap my head around the new auth system. All the Auth*Authoritative directives seem to have copied their docs content from someplace that refers to lower level modules (as defined in the modules.c

mod_authz_dbd: SQL-based authz with Login/Session support

2005-11-15 Thread Nick Kew
I attach mod_authz_dbd.c and associated documentation, which I consider a candidate for committing to trunk. Please review. In addition to SQL-based group access support (Require dbd-group) common to authz modules in general, it supports two further Require forms: Require dbd-login Require

Re: Auth*Authoritative

2005-11-15 Thread Joshua Slive
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: The ordering/implications is now governed by either the provider lists (as specified in the Auth*Provider directives) or the hooks (as per Auth*Authoritative if a module doesn't participate in the new provider scheme). The provider system is, IMHO, a far cleaner

Typo in modules\proxy\mod_proxy.c

2005-11-15 Thread Christophe Jaillet
Typo in modules\proxy\mod_proxy.c, in function set_status_opt, line 1388 : Instead of : === return ProxyStatus must be one of: off | on | block; We should have : === return ProxyStatus must be one of: off | on | full; CJ

Re: Auth*Authoritative

2005-11-15 Thread Nick Kew
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 21:12, Joshua Slive wrote: The Auth*Provider directives make sense to me for choosing which mod_authn_* module will get a crack at doing authentication. But there are two other ordering problems: mod_auth_basic versus mod_auth_digest and the mod_authz_* modules in

Re: svn commit: r344369 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/

2005-11-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
--On November 15, 2005 10:01:09 AM -0500 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: changing a default like this on a 2.0 to 2.2 upgrade, and I'd prefer it you put it back to off. There is a basic issue of applicaitions which trust the SERVER_NAME variable to contain something sensical. When

Re: Auth*Authoritative

2005-11-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On November 15, 2005 4:12:44 PM -0500 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Getting closer, but I'm still confused. The Auth*Provider directives make sense to me for choosing which mod_authn_* module will get a crack at doing authentication. But there are two other ordering problems:

Re: Auth*Authoritative

2005-11-15 Thread Brad Nicholes
One other thing, the authorization type (valid-user, user, group, etc.) should be unique among all of the authorization modules. In other words, only one authz module should be implementing valid-user not every module like in the 2.0 architecture. This is the main reason why you now see the

Re: Typo in modules\proxy\mod_proxy.c

2005-11-15 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 11/15/05, Christophe Jaillet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Typo in modules\proxy\mod_proxy.c, in function set_status_opt, line 1388 : Thanks for the patch! Committed to trunk.

gratuitous call to create_server_config?

2005-11-15 Thread Brandon Fosdick
I have a test box with 2.0.55 on it and it's set for a single vhost, with no overall host (I think). I also set StartServers, MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers and MaxClients to 1, with the intent of having only one process running. So now I have only two processes running. Obviously I missed

Send -k start argument to modules

2005-11-15 Thread pradeep kumar
Hi, I see that the -k start is stripped from process-argv which is handed over to modules. I have a requirement where I want the -k start also in my module. I see that argv is getting stripped of -k start in server/mpm_common.c. How can I send this value to my module. Would writing this detail in

Re: Console _commit() fails on Win

2005-11-15 Thread Vadim Chekan
On 11/13/05, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vadim Chekan wrote: [cut] I think we can remove safely _commit() call. Note: I have Win XP Pro(sp2) Visual Studio 2005. Yes, that's possibly true in VS2005, but not in MSVC 5 or 6, so it stays. Note that httpd.exe really isn't