perl-framework + apache 2.1.9 + openssl-0.9.8a

2005-11-20 Thread Oden Eriksson
Hello. Not so long ago I started packaging apache 2.1.x (rpm) and also run the perl-framework tests at build time in Mandriva Cooker (development branch of Mandriva Linux). Ever since I updated openssl-0.9.7i - openssl-0.9.8a some ssl tests in the perl-framework stopped working. Is this a

2.1 Live on Proudction Sites was Re: [VOTE] 2.1.10 as GA

2005-11-20 Thread Paul Querna
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Paul Querna wrote: Tarballs available from: http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.1.10/ Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.10 as STABLE/General Availability. At this time -1 for GA release. +1 to proceed with Beta. Things to happen that will move

Deleting the async-dev branch

2005-11-20 Thread Brian Pane
I've created a new branch off of the httpd trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/async-read-dev/ The old async-dev branch is rather out of date at this point, and all its nonblocking write code has since been committed to the trunk. Rather than doing a monstrous merge to

Re: Small cleanup in /modules/mappers/mod_negotiation.c, in function get_body

2005-11-20 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/19/2005 10:20 PM, Nick Kew wrote: On Saturday 19 November 2005 21:03, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Thanks. Committed to trunk as r345686 (http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=345686view=rev). Fine. But do such trivial changes - or indeed anything that has no effect on functionality -

Re: [VOTE] 2.1.10 as GA

2005-11-20 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:17:42PM -0800, Paul Querna wrote: Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.10 as STABLE/General Availability. -1 for GA, +1 for beta, as the release is unbuildable on systems with APR 1.0 or 1.1 installed. Unfortunately I'm away in Munich right now, so I havn't had a

Re: Small cleanup in /modules/mappers/mod_negotiation.c, in function get_body

2005-11-20 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/20/2005 11:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: [..cut..] If there is consensus that such trivial CHANGES should not be added (which I would also tend to with the reasons you mentioned), then I will happily remove the CHANGE log entry. So another comment please! Ok, forget about the

Re: 2.1 Live on Proudction Sites was Re: [VOTE] 2.1.10 as GA

2005-11-20 Thread Nick Kew
On Sunday 20 November 2005 08:11, Paul Querna wrote: Things to happen that will move my vote twords +1; * Go live on a major Apache server for 1 week, no stability issues. (Thanks Sander for kicking this off!) FWIW, www.apache.org has been running 2.1.9 since early November. I've

Re: Deleting the async-dev branch

2005-11-20 Thread Nick Kew
On Sunday 20 November 2005 08:21, Brian Pane wrote: I've created a new branch off of the httpd trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/async-read-dev/ The old async-dev branch is rather out of date at this point, and all its nonblocking write code has since been committed

Re: Small cleanup in /modules/mappers/mod_negotiation.c, in function get_body

2005-11-20 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 11/20/05, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/20/2005 11:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: [..cut..] If there is consensus that such trivial CHANGES should not be added (which I would also tend to with the reasons you mentioned), then I will happily remove the CHANGE

Re: Deleting the async-dev branch

2005-11-20 Thread Max Bowsher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick Kew wrote: On Sunday 20 November 2005 08:21, Brian Pane wrote: I've created a new branch off of the httpd trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/async-read-dev/ The old async-dev branch is rather out of date at this

Re: [VOTE] 2.1.10 as GA

2005-11-20 Thread Paul Querna
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:17:42PM -0800, Paul Querna wrote: Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.10 as STABLE/General Availability. -1 for GA, +1 for beta, as the release is unbuildable on systems with APR 1.0 or 1.1 installed. But, it is supposed to be.

Re: [VOTE] 2.1.10 as GA

2005-11-20 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 04:33:12AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote: Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:17:42PM -0800, Paul Querna wrote: Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.10 as STABLE/General Availability. -1 for GA, +1 for beta, as the release is unbuildable on systems

Re: Small cleanup in /modules/mappers/mod_negotiation.c, in function

2005-11-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 11/19/2005 10:20 PM, Nick Kew wrote: On Saturday 19 November 2005 21:03, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Thanks. Committed to trunk as r345686 (http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=345686view=rev). Fine. But do such trivial changes - or indeed anything that has no

Re: [VOTE] 2.1.10 as GA

2005-11-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
Paul Querna wrote: Tarballs available from: http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.1.10/ Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.10 as STABLE/General Availability. If the vote passes, it will be re-rolled as 2.2.0. I intend to leave the vote open for at least 7-10 days.

mod_dav and EBCDIC

2005-11-20 Thread Jeff Trawick
On input path, ap_xml_parse_input() handles converting xml to native charset (at least in 2.2). On output, there is no provision for converting xml in responses. Some choices: (a) convert right in DAV before calling ap_fXXX() APIs (b) have DAV implement a filter that converts xml from native to

Re: Small cleanup in /modules/mappers/mod_negotiation.c, in function get_body

2005-11-20 Thread Nick Kew
On Sunday 20 November 2005 11:03, Jeff Trawick wrote: I think it is a good idea for people who show up with patches out of the blue to see a recognition of their contribution, even if relatively small. Many people off the dev list don't realize that a lot of fixes come from random people.

Re: mod_dav and EBCDIC

2005-11-20 Thread Nick Kew
On Sunday 20 November 2005 14:53, Jeff Trawick wrote: On input path, ap_xml_parse_input() handles converting xml to native charset (at least in 2.2). On output, there is no provision for converting xml in responses. Is this a hypothetical or real-life issue? Some choices: (a) convert

Re: [VOTE] 2.1.10 as GA

2005-11-20 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
[ resending ] On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 12:43:09PM +, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: Yep, but it's how the user gets around that that's the real problem. If a user has apr 1.1 installed in /usr, the only way to get httpd to configure is to over-write that APR installation. There's no way to get

Re: Deleting the async-dev branch

2005-11-20 Thread Phillip Susi
Actually you have to use a peg revision, not -r. If you try -r to look at the deleted branch, svn tries to find the named directory in the HEAD revision, then look up it's state as it existed in rev x. This will fail since it does not exist in the head revision, so instead you have to do

Request for comments: connection states for nonblocking request reads

2005-11-20 Thread Brian Pane
Now that we have nonblocking write completion support in the Event MPM, I've begun thinking about how to implement nonblocking, event-driven reads of incoming requests. Here's a diagram of the connection state diagram with some minor changes to support nonblocking reads:

Bug report for Apache httpd-1.3 [2005/11/20]

2005-11-20 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Apache httpd-2.0 [2005/11/20]

2005-11-20 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: Deleting the async-dev branch

2005-11-20 Thread Brian Pane
On Nov 20, 2005, at 1:34 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: Actually you have to use a peg revision, not -r. If you try -r to look at the deleted branch, svn tries to find the named directory in the HEAD revision, then look up it's state as it existed in rev x. This will fail since it does not