* Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-10 17:56:38]:
> Finally, I would like to know your feelings about the surgery branch
> that was created a few weeks ago : the module is operational and this
> branch provide a cleaner and more evolutive directory structure, as
> well as a complete un
There aren't any x64 binaries yet...I'de be willing to create them if needed.But what is nececary for the msi installer?~ Jorge
[Your merge today prompted me to dig out a response I started but
never finished.]
I am still worried that we are underestimating the pain that this will
cause. In my opinion, a config change that requires substantial
changes to every httpd.conf and many .htaccess files requires a major
version b
Joshua Slive wrote:
[Your merge today prompted me to dig out a response I started but
never finished.]
I am still worried that we are underestimating the pain that this will
cause. In my opinion, a config change that requires substantial
changes to every httpd.conf and many .htaccess files requ
Hi,
The point of this post is that currently it is not possible to create
a module that can implement new server_record, since some major
functions are not available. On contrary I can implement
hook_process_connection, but I'm unable to create new server instance
with full per_dir_config and s
Title: Message
I was able to build
Apache 2.2.0 for windows and get it working fine one machine. But when I
installed it on a different windows box, I get the following error when I try to
run httpd.exe
C:\apache22\bin>httpd.exeThe system cannot execute the specified
program.
I would im
Josh, glad you were successful. I agree that your message seems to indicate
a problem; did you copy the entire installed Apache2 directory?
If you have, what OS's are those two machines (the working and non-working
ones?) The newest 2.2 version now has absolute dependencies upon ldap.
Which fla
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
There aren't any x64 binaries yet...
Nope, although both you and I and a few others have experimented with
building these.
I'de be willing to create them if needed.
But what is nececary for the msi installer?
The current installer is written in InstallShield 10 (reada
Yep, I copied every and modified the configuration files accordingly.
I have it working on the XP box that it was built on. It won't run on
different XP and 2003 boxes.
I compiled it with Visual Studio 2005. (That's what is recommended,
right?)
,
Josh.
> -Original Message-
> From: Will
Build with VS 2005, see for deploying on other computers:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zebw5zk9(en-US,VS.80).aspx
Steffen
http://www.apachelounge.com
- Original Message -
From: "Fenlason, Josh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 6:31 PM
Subject:
Steffen wrote:
Build with VS 2005, see for deploying on other computers:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zebw5zk9(en-US,VS.80).aspx
FYI, DEPENDS.EXE is a useful utility deployed with all flavors of VisualStudio,
which provides a graphical equivilant of Unix ldd. It will help you deter
Yeah, I stumbled upon depends.exe this morning. I used it on the 2k3
box and found out that it couldn't find msjava.dll (Why is this needed
for Apache?) and msvcr80.dll. I copied them from the working XP box
into \bin. It found the dlls, but I still get the same
error.
Error: The Side-b
Fenlason, Josh wrote:
Yeah, I stumbled upon depends.exe this morning. I used it on the 2k3
box and found out that it couldn't find msjava.dll (Why is this needed
for Apache?) and msvcr80.dll. I copied them from the working XP box
into \bin. It found the dlls, but I still get the same
error.
msjava.dll is not needed. Apache 2.2 builds out of the box with Visual
Studio c++ 2005, no additional flags etc. needed.
Apache 2.2 depends on msvcr80.dll and his manifest/policy.
You have some options:
- install the .NET framework 2.0 on the target computer.
or
- if you do not want to i
On Jan 11, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Joshua Slive wrote:
[Your merge today prompted me to dig out a response I started but
never finished.]
I am still worried that we are underestimating the pain that this will
cause. In my opinion, a config change that requires substantial
changes to every httpd.conf
For someone looking for something to do,
The authorization code makes an assumption that filesystems allowing
file ownership is a platform-specific define. That is not
the case for the same reason that case-sensitivity is not based
on the platform. All of the filesystem characteristics should b
On 01/11/2006 11:23 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
>> [Your merge today prompted me to dig out a response I started but
>> never finished.]
>>
>> I am still worried that we are underestimating the pain that this will
>> cause. In my opinion, a co
Nick Kew schrieb:
On Friday 06 January 2006 19:20, Steffen wrote:
> Several ppl tried it, but it crashes Apache or it looses connections,
> see: http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=52
>
> To get it compiled, as i told you before, mysql.h has to be changed,
> see: http://www.apachel
>>> On 1/11/2006 at 3:43:36 pm, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 01/11/2006 11:23 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> On Jan 11, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Joshua Slive wrote:
>>
>>> [Your merge today prompted me to dig out a response I started but
>>> never finished.]
>>>
>>> I
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-01-11 17:38:11 -0500 (Wed, 11 Jan 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is main
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-12-16 16:06:45 -0500 (Fri, 16 Dec 2005) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained se
21 matches
Mail list logo
