[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-124?page=comments#action_12366954
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-124:
Whoops, stuffed up what the names should be. They should be:
req.auth_name()
req.auth_type()
If "get_" prefix
On 19/02/2006, at 3:24 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Thus depending on what you are doing, you need one or the other. To
make it
obvious, should perhaps use a distinct method name to add handlers
as stacked
handlers against the current handler list. Thus:
def all(req):
req.add_stacked_h
David Reid wrote:
+extern APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_satisfies) *ap_satisfies;
... defines ap_satisfies as a pointer that exists in another module, to an
optional function ap_satisfies.
What I think you want is a local ap_satisfies (not extern) and then assign
it to the registered function resul
Add req.server.get_options() for obtain PythonOption values set at global level.
Key: MODPYTHON-137
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-137
Project: mod_python
Type: New
Sorry, long ramble to help me, more than anyone else, understand the
issues.
On 19/02/2006, at 7:44 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
I'll post more later when I have a chance to check a few things,
but I am
going to backtrack a bit. How far I don't know yet.
In short for now, mod_perl has a a c
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-94?page=comments#action_12366945
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-94:
---
Changes as contained in requestobject.c.patch and modpython4.tex.patch applied
to mod_python SVN trunk in revision 37
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-77?page=comments#action_12366941
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-77:
---
Changes as contained in grahamd_20051105.tar.gz commited to mod_python SVN
trunk at revision 378803.
> The multiple
On 02/19/2006 12:59 AM, David Reid wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>>On 02/18/2006 11:46 PM, David Reid wrote:
>>
>>>Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> Nothing personal, just that people seem mmore willing to shout "revert"
Had not seen this as personal :-).
> than to look and fix it. You did do
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 02/18/2006 11:46 PM, David Reid wrote:
>> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>> So please revert or fix.
>>
>> Why are people so quick to ask for reversion these days?
>
> Please note that I said revert *or* fix.
> I fully understand (not in technical detail) the trouble you have
On 02/18/2006 11:46 PM, David Reid wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>So please revert or fix.
>
>
> Why are people so quick to ask for reversion these days?
Please note that I said revert *or* fix.
I fully understand (not in technical detail) the trouble you have with the
reworked
parts of
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 02/17/2006 12:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/aaa/mod_auth.h
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/aaa/mod_auth.h?rev=378394&r1=378393&r2=378394&view=diff
>> ===
11 matches
Mail list logo
