Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
This patch implements copying a file in the background so the client
initiating the caching can get the file delivered by read-while-caching
instead of having to wait for the file to finish.
Something that Joe Orton raised, and that I've been looking into in more
det
On 10/10/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are responsible for mutexing; and remember unless you alloc before fork
and never modify the data, it's per-process private.
Is this to say that using a subpool of a "s->process->pool" pool, what
mutations made by one child proces
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
There is no sendfile_nonblocking in the 2.2.x branch :-).
Brian's changes regarding async write completion have not been backported.
Indeed :) I should have checked...
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 10/10/2006 11:58 PM, wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Tue Oct 10 14:58:29 2006
> New Revision: 462594
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=462594
> Log:
> Propose some backports.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STA
>>> On 10/10/2006 at 8:58 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Eric Covener"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/10/06, Javier Sagrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, i can write my modules, based on modules that i know will have a
>> "conflict" with mine using the "if ..."
>> but that is a little
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-127?page=comments#action_12441188
]
Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-127:
-
+1
Your suggestion is logical. Explicit is better than implict.
> Use namespace for mod_python PythonOption
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 16:43, Brian McQueen wrote:
> I am having a problem with keeping data in my apr_table_t. During a
> request I obtain the server config structure, store something in there
> (some statistics which should have the scope of the life of the
> server), and then when the next
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Sorry for late reply.
I'd say defer this to 3.4, or whatever will come after 3.3. For what little
is left to do on 3.3 as it is, we are already bogging down.
+1
Even just trying a quick run, came up with a few issues.
1. Can't decode Apache version string.
Traceback
I am having a problem with keeping data in my apr_table_t. During a
request I obtain the server config structure, store something in there
(some statistics which should have the scope of the life of the
server), and then when the next request comes along, the data is gone!
During the request I st
On 10/10/06, Javier Sagrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, i can write my modules, based on modules that i know will have a
"conflict" with mine using the "if ..."
but that is a little limited, i just find strange that you dont have control
of the order in which the functions are call,
Your exa
On 10/10/06 7:28 AM, "Nick Kew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't that mean
> AN Other module can register its own "int:foo" functions, and
> the documentation is wrong?
That is my understanding: the framework is in place, just not documented.
--
Brian Akins
Chief Operations Engineer
Turn
Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 13:00, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> On 10/10/2006 12:33 PM, wrote:
>>> Author: niq
>>> Date: Tue Oct 10 03:33:06 2006
>>> New Revision: 454683
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=454683
>>> Log:
>>> Add SQL Query capability to RewriteMap
So, i can write my modules, based on modules that i know will have a
"conflict" with mine using the "if ..."
but that is a little limited, i just find strange that you dont have control
of the order in which the functions are call,
And even more strange, that the inclusion of a function registere
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 13:00, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 10/10/2006 12:33 PM, wrote:
> > Author: niq
> > Date: Tue Oct 10 03:33:06 2006
> > New Revision: 454683
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=454683
> > Log:
> > Add SQL Query capability to RewriteMap
> >
> >
> > Modifie
On 10/10/2006 12:33 PM, wrote:
> Author: niq
> Date: Tue Oct 10 03:33:06 2006
> New Revision: 454683
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=454683
> Log:
> Add SQL Query capability to RewriteMap
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/mappers/mod_rewrite.c
> URL:
> http://svn.apa
I've just added SQL query (DBD) capability to RewriteMap.
Having read the documentation, I see it supports internal
functions toupper/tolower/escape/unescape. I had in mind to
add support for other internal functions while I was hacking it.
Now, I see we have ap_register_rewrite_mapfunc in the
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 09:33, Javier Sagrera wrote:
> I can't see that using the 2nd and 3rd argument would be a proper solution,
> then you will need to write
> you module based in what other module you have loaded in your apache which
> doesnt look quite good idea to me.
Nope. Those are to
Thanks for the reply,
So basically, you have no control what so ever of when the function will be
called if you
register it with MIDDLE? You need to rely on other functions to return a
DECLINED?
I can't see that using the 2nd and 3rd argument would be a proper solution,
then you will need to w
18 matches
Mail list logo
